View clinical trials related to Intraosseous Access.
Filter by:A Survey on the Cognition and Use of Intraosseous Access among Emergency Medical Staff, which is based on the platform of "WJX.CN", from January 5, 2018 to January 23, 2018, via local emergency-related academic organizations to emergency medical staff throughout the country. There are 3 sections in the questionnaire: the demographic information of the participants; cognition levels and clinical use of IO; barriers and attitudes towards clinical use of IO including willingness, confidence and training demand.
Overall survival of patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (*OHCA*) is less than 10% worldwide and in Taiwan. Interventions provided by the emergency medical system (*EMS*) before arrival at the hospital are of paramount importance to patient outcomes after OHCA. Among those interventions, the pros-and-cons of different vascular accesses, including intraosseous (*IO*) access or intravenous (*IV*) access, remained the issue of most under debate. The objective of this study is to determine the comparative effectiveness of IO access vs IV access in patients with OHCA by a randomized controlled trial (*RCT*) in Taipei EMS. To name in short, the investigators called it a "*VICTOR* trial" standing for "Venous Injection Compared To intraOsseous injection during Resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest".
The investigators sought to compare the intraosseous access success rates of the proximal tibia and the proximal humerus using new Intraosseous access device "NIO" in an adult cadaver model during simulated resuscitation.