Intestinal Polyps Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Comparison of Two Colonoscopic Withdrawal Techniques on Colonic Polyp Detection: an Open, Randomised, Cross Over Trial
This study will compare two strategies for colonoscope withdrawal, using polyp detection as
the primary outcome measure, to determine the optimal withdrawal strategy.
Null Hypothesis:
On withdrawal of the colonoscope, examining patients with dynamic position change does not
yield more polyps than the supine position.
Alternative Hypothesis:
On withdrawal of the colonoscope, examining the patients with dynamic position change
improves polyp detection compared to the supine position.
The identification and removal of polyps has been shown to prevent bowel cancer. Although colonoscopy is the best technique to identify polyps, polyps can be missed even in expert hands. Inspection of the bowel occurs predominantly during colonoscope withdrawal. Tailoring a patients position according to the segment of bowel being examined (dynamic position change) is a technique that has been shown to improve visualisation of the bowel wall and polyp detection. However, changing patient position during colonoscope withdrawal has not been widely accepted in clinical practice. This may be because of a lack of awareness of the literature, a perception that the benefit is negligible and the inconvenience of changing a patients position in addition to the small number of publications demonstrating this to be beneficial. We plan to compare the detection of polyps when colonoscope withdrawal is done with dynamic position change (a planned series of position changes to optimise mucosal visualisation) and the supine position (laid on back). These strategies will be compared by performing a double colonoscope withdrawal; The first withdrawal will be performed either supine or in the dynamic position. This will be followed by a second insertion and withdrawal in the alternative position. The order in which these strategies are performed will be randomised i.e. supine then dynamic or dynamic then supine. ;
Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05526339 -
HFNO Combined With NPA Reduces Hypoxia During Sedated Gastrointestinal Endoscopy In Obese Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05517408 -
Dose Exploration of Ciprofol for Sedation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment of Obese Patients.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04921488 -
Interest of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Screening Colonoscopy
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT00996619 -
Measuring the Spectrum of Tissues During Endoscopy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05594576 -
Comparison of the ENDOCUFF VISION® Endoscopy Cap Coupled With GI GENIUSâ„¢ Artificial Intelligence Compared to Each Device Alone in Improving Colonic Adenoma Detection Rate During Colonoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03417258 -
Phytoestrogens and Colonic Adenomatous Polyps
|
||
Completed |
NCT02986308 -
The Metabolomics of Intestinal Polyps of Different Pathological Types and TCM Syndromes and TCM Constitution Types
|
||
Completed |
NCT05481632 -
Validating the Safety and Effectiveness of ENDOANGEL Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscope Image Auxiliary Diagnostic Software
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03072472 -
BowelScope: Accuracy of Detection Using ENdocuff Optimisation of Mucosal Abnormalities
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01577875 -
Comparison of Narrow Band Imaging With or Without Magnifying Colonoscopy
|
N/A |