Internet-Based Intervention Clinical Trial
— L2P2Official title:
Love Together, Parent Together (L2P2): A Protocol for a Pilot RCT of a Brief Writing Intervention for Interparental Couples With Young Children Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic
Verified date | January 2023 |
Source | York University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The COVID-19 pandemic has created a population-level threat to social relationships that requires a population-level solution. Among those who are particularly vulnerable to heightened conflict are interparental couples with young children, whose relationships may have already been under pressure prior to the pandemic. Reduced couples' satisfaction has been reported since the start of the pandemic, with over one-third of romantic partners reporting heightened conflict due to COVID-19. Couples are likely to stay in disharmonious relationships during times of socioeconomic upheaval, with the potential for relationship problems to persist over time. This may have serious implications for the mental health of parents, parent-child relationships, and children's emotional and behavioural problems (EBPs). Such a pattern is a societal concern given the known associations between couples' relationship quality and a number of critical indicators of population health, such as intimate partner violence, physical health and all-cause mortality, and economic instability, particularly for women. The current study protocol is for a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the Love Together Parent Together (L2P2) program-a brief, low-intensity, scalable relationship intervention for parents of young children. The two-arm (treatment vs. waitlist) pilot RCT will assess the feasibility goals: continued relationship-building with established recruitment partners and outreach to additional recruitment partners to increase enrolment rates; recruitment of a diverse sample in terms of sociocultural identity factors, pandemic-related stress, and relationship distress; acceptability of randomization; outcome assessment schedule completion (for treatment and control groups), retention and adherence to the program; and program acceptability. Additionally, the investigators will conduct a preliminary evaluation of treatment effects by examining group differences in couples-focused (i.e., couples' relationship, conflict-related negativity, interparental functioning) and family-focused outcomes (i.e., parent-child relations, parent mental health and child outcomes). A scalable couples-focused intervention is critically needed to circumvent the social consequences of the pandemic on young families.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 240 |
Est. completion date | January 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | January 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Both participants endorse being in a relationship - Both partners reside in the same house - There are one or more children under the age of 6 living at home - Both participants are over age 18 years - Both members of a couple agree to participate Exclusion Criteria: - No current plans or history of separation or divorce |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | York University | Toronto | Ontario |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
York University | McMaster University, University of Toronto |
Canada,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Risk for Relationship Distress - Dyadic Adjustment Scale | The percentage of participants scoring in the 'clinical range' (<13) on the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Minimum score=1, maximum score=22. Lower scores correspond to worse outcomes. | Week 0-22 | |
Primary | Risk for Relationship Distress - COVID-19 Family Stressors | The percentage of participants scoring 'high' (>29) on the COVID-19 Family Stressor Scale. Minimum score=16, maximum score=48. Higher scores correspond to worse outcomes. | Week 0 | |
Primary | COVID Coping/Benefits | Background information. Minimum score=14, maximum score=42 . Higher scores correspond to better outcomes. | Week 0 | |
Primary | Adverse Childhood Experiences | Background information. Adverse Childhood Experiences Scale. Minimum score=0, maximum score=14. Higher scores correspond to higher ACES count. | Week 0 | |
Primary | Participants Enrolled Per Week | Number of participants enrolled per week, stratified by recruitment source. | Week 0 | |
Primary | Participant Education | The percentage of participants with less than or equal to a College degree. | Week 0 | |
Primary | Participant Income | The percentage of participants income that is less than or equal to the regional median. | Week 0 | |
Primary | Racial Diversity | The percentage of participants who identify as part of a racialized group. | Week 0 | |
Primary | Sexual Diversity | The percentage of participants who are gender and/or sexually diverse. | Week 0 | |
Primary | Immigration Status | The percentage of participants who were born outside of Canada. | Week 0 | |
Primary | Adherence | The percentage of participants who complete 2/3 intervention sessions. | Week 1-9 | |
Primary | Acceptability | The percentage of participants reporting at least 'agree' on scales of attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, and ethicality on the Implementation Acceptability Scale. Minimum score=7, maximum score=35. Higher scores correspond to higher acceptability. | Week 10 | |
Primary | Uptake | The percentage of participants reporting some use of conflict reappraisal outside of intervention sessions (i.e., reporting a score of 3 or more on a scale of 1-7). Minimum score=1, maximum score=7. Higher scores correspond to better outcomes. | Week 5-22 | |
Primary | Retention | The percentage of participants who complete their Randomly Allocated Assignment (defined as completing baseline, 2/3 writing sessions, post-intervention, and 1/2 follow-up surveys). | Week 22 | |
Secondary | Couples' Relationship Quality | Using the Perceived Relationship Quality Scale. Minimum score=18, maximum score=126. Higher scores correspond to better outcomes. | Week 0-22 | |
Secondary | Conflict Frequency | Using one item on a 7-point Likert scale: "Think about your experiences with your partner over the last four weeks. How often did you and your partner argue with each other?" Minimum score=1, maximum score=7. Higher scores correspond to worse outcomes. | Week 0-22 | |
Secondary | Conflict-Related Negativity | Using two items following a fact-based summary: "I was angry at my partner for his/her behaviour during this conflict," "My partner's behaviour during this conflict was highly upsetting to me." Minimum score=2, maximum score=14. Higher scores correspond to worse outcomes. | Week 1-9 | |
Secondary | Coparenting | The Brief Coparenting Relationship Scale. Minimum score=0, maximum score=84. Higher scores correspond to better outcomes. | Week 0-22 | |
Secondary | Brief Coparenting Assessment | Six items from the Brief Coparenting Relationship Scale (Feinberg et al., 2012). Minimum score = 0, maximum score = 36. Higher scores correspond to better outcomes. | Week 1-9 | |
Secondary | Parent-Child Positivity | Using the 5-item parent-reported positivity subscale of the Parenting Practices Scale. Minimum score=5, maximum score=25. Higher scores correspond to better outcomes. | Week 0-22 | |
Secondary | Parent-Child Negativity | Using the 5-item parent-reported negativity subscale of the Parenting Practices Scale. Minimum score=5, maximum score=25. Higher scores correspond to worse outcomes. | Week 0-22 | |
Secondary | Parent Mental Health | Using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Minimum score=10, maximum score=50. Higher scores correspond to worse outcomes. | Week 0-22 | |
Secondary | Perceived Partner Responsiveness | Using the Perceived Partner Responsiveness-Insensitivity Scale (PRI-R)- Brief Version. Minimum score=8, maximum score=40. Higher scores correspond to better outcomes. | Week 0-22 | |
Secondary | Responsiveness Towards Partner | Using the Perceived Partner Responsiveness-Insensitivity Scale (PRI) - Brief with items flipped to reflect responsiveness towards partner. Minimum score=8, maximum score=40. Higher scores correspond to better outcomes. | Week 0-22 | |
Secondary | Family Functioning | Using the Family Assessment Device. Minimum score=12, maximum score=48. Higher scores correspond to worse outcomes. | Week 0-22 | |
Secondary | Child Emotional and Behavioural Problems | Scores will be standardized within each age group and used as a single outcome variable.
Using the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (Baby, Preschool and Standard versions). The Baby Pediatric Symptom Checklist: minimum score=0, maximum score=26. Higher scores correspond to worse outcomes. The Preschool Pediatric Symptoms Checklist (PPSC-17): minimum score=0, maximum score=36. Higher scores correspond to worse outcomes. The Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17: minimum score=0, maximum score=34. Higher scores correspond to worse outcomes. |
Week 0-22 | |
Secondary | Child Effortful Control | Using the Effortful Control subscale (12 items) of the Infant Behaviour Questionnaire- Revised Very Short Form (3-12 months), Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire-Revised Very Short Form (18-36 months) and Children's Behaviour Questionnaire-Revised Very Short Form (3-7 years). Minimum score=0 , maximum score=84. Higher scores correspond to better outcomes. | Week 0-22 | |
Secondary | Child Development | Using the 10-item Developmental Milestones scale from The Survey of Well-being of Young Children (i.e., the 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48 and 60 month age-specific forms). Minimum score=0, maximum score =20. Higher scores correspond to better outcomes. | Week 0-22 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06012084 -
The Development and Evaluation of iCF-PWR for Healthy Siblings of Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04775927 -
Pre-marital Internet-based Sexual and Reproductive Health Education
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04544930 -
Therapist-guided Internet Treatment for Hazardous and Harmful Alcohol Use. A Feasibility Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05895539 -
Evaluating Treatment Continuation in Telehealth Patients Receiving an Automated Patient-Reported Outcome Tool
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04650906 -
A Feasibility Study for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Mindhelper - a National Youth Mental Health Promotion Website
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06423417 -
RCT: the Effectiveness of LifeHack in Improving Mental Wellbeing in University Students.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04688567 -
Patient-driven Internet Delivered Psychological Treatment
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04409210 -
Cardio-Cerebrovascular Co-Prevention and Co-Management Based on Internet+
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05442762 -
Social Media-based Vaccine Confidence and Hesitancy Monitoring
|
||
Completed |
NCT04902404 -
Evaluation of the First Pathways Game on Parent-child Interactions and Development for Vulnerable Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05356247 -
Lausanne Trialogue Paradigm - Brief: A Family Model for Child Mental Health in a Community Setting
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02835768 -
Effectiveness of Internet-based Injury Prevention Program in Enhancing Mother's Knowledge on Child Safety
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05777915 -
SOSteniamoci: Usability Study
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06020274 -
Internet-delivered Cystic Fibrosis Mental Health Prevention, Wellness, Resource Program: How Does it Work?
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04259268 -
Evaluation of the Quality of Preoperative Information Obtained Through Preanestes@s, a Web Based Application
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05281913 -
Psychoeducational Simulation Game for Adults in Stepfamilies
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05711342 -
The Added Value of an Internet-based Intervention for Treatment of Forensic Psychiatric Outpatients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05235243 -
Can Mindfulness and Self-monitoring Improve Control Over Maladaptive Daydreaming?
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05143437 -
Love Together, Parent Together: A Feasibility Study
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06385457 -
The Effects of Mindhelper on Young People's Well-being, Psychological Functioning, and Intentions to Help-seeking
|
N/A |