Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT01593202 |
Other study ID # |
ES4894 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 2012 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
October 2023 |
Source |
Oslo University Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy of dialectical behavior
therapy (DBT) in treatment of adolescents with deliberate self harm compared to enhanced
usual care (EUC). This study follows-up 77 patients in the ages of 12-18 yrs who have been
included in an RCT of DBT-A vs EUC. The main inclusion criterion for this study was
repetitive self-harm behaviour. The patients were randomly allocated to receive 16 weeks of
outpatient DBT or EUC in child and adolescent psychiatric clinics in Oslo. Participants have
been assessed so far on five different time-points: baseline (before starting treatment), 9
weeks, 15 weeks, 19 weeks and 71 weeks after start of the treatment. In the current project
patients will be assessed a 6th time 2 years after treatment completion.
The main study hypotheses are:
- DBT will be significantly more efficacious in reducing the number of self-harm episodes
with or without intent to die, as well as reducing the number of emergency room visits
for self-harm or suicidal behaviour, compared to EUC.
- DBT will be significantly more efficacious in reducing the level of suicidal ideation
and depressive symptoms compared to EUC.
Description:
The study is a long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing DBT-A with enhanced usual
care (EUC). Participants were randomly allocated to receive either treatment at 1 of the
participating child and adolescent psychiatric outpatient clinics in a 1:1 ratio stratified
according to gender, presence of major depression, and presence of suicide intent during the
most serious episode of self-harm behavior within the 16 weeks before enrollment. Treatment
allocation of participants after baseline assessments was based on a permuted block
randomization procedure with an undisclosed and variable blocking factor, and daily
management of the randomization procedures was performed by an external group. Patients
received either DBT or EUC by therapists working at and funded by the 10 child and adolescent
psychiatric outpatient clinics participating in the study. They were assessed during
treatment (9 and 15 weeks), at treatment completion 19 weeks, and at 71 weeks. In this study
they are assessed at 2 years after treatment completion.
The assessment of outcomes include: number of self-reported self-harm episodes (suicide
attempts and non-suicidal self-harm episodes combined, measured by Lifetime Parasucide
Count); the severity of suicidal ideation as measured by the 15-item self-report Suicidal
Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ-JR; and level of depressive symptoms as measured by the 13-item
version of the self-report Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ) and through the
interviewer rated 10-item Montgomery-_Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Other outcomes
are hopelessness, measured by the 20-item self-report Beck Hopelessness Scale
(BHS);borderline symptoms, assessed through the 23-itemself-report Borderline Symptom List
(BSL); Borderline Personality Disorder as measured by SCID-II; and hospital admissions and
emergency department visits because of self-harm.