Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04476355 |
Other study ID # |
2019-533 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 1, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
December 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2021 |
Source |
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Physical restraints (PR) are widely used in ICU around the world. Many institutions have
suggested that the use of PR should be reduced. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are a
convenient way of packaging evidence and presenting recommendations to healthcare decision
makers. There are currently no CPGs on PR in China, while other countries had, so we hope to
be able to adapt existing guidelines to apply in Chinese context. We use the CAN-IMPLEMENT
approach to adapt and implement the guidelines.
Description:
Critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) often need more invasive
operations (e.g.mechanical ventilation and hemodialysis), due to the needs from their
condition, which can also lead to acute pain, discomfort, sleep deprivation, agitation and
delirium. Agitation, for example, can propel patients to resist the ventilator, thus
increasing the oxygen consumption, causing them to accidentally remove various devices and
catheters on them and even posing life-threatening risks. Therefore, the main reason for the
use of physical restraints (PR) around ICU is to prevent patients from accidentally removing
the catheters or devices needed to protect their safety.
Although PR was used to prevent Unplanned extubation (UE), there were many studies proved
that PR is one of the risk factors that account for UE and can not protect patient safety.
Indeed, its use has been proven to cause pressure injuries, worsen agitation, delirium and
neurovascular complications. But PR is widely used in ICU around the world.
Many institutions have suggested that the use of PR should be reduced, for example, the
Government of Ontario released the Patient Restraints Minimization Act in 2001 to "minimize
the use of restraints on patients and to encourage hospitals and facilities to use
alternative methods, whenever possible, when it is necessary to prevent serious bodily harm
by a patient to himself or herself or to others. Registered Nurses Association of Ontario
(RNAO) issued clinical practice guidelines on the alternatives to PR in February 2012, aimed
to help nurses reduce the use of PR, or use it in a more reasonable and standardized way, and
to provide effective alternatives of PR.
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are a convenient way of packaging evidence and presenting
recommendations to healthcare decision makers. But the development and updating of
high-quality CPGs require substantial time, expertise and resources. Guideline adaptation is
the systematic approach to the endorsement and/or modification of a guideline(s) produced in
one cultural and organisational setting for application in a different context. Where high
quality guidelines are already available, adaptation may be used as an alternative to de novo
guideline development to customise the existing guideline to the needs of local users. There
are currently no CPGs on PR in China, while other countries had, so we hope to be able to
adapt existing guidelines to apply in Chinese context. We use the CAN-IMPLEMENT approach to
adapt and implement the guidelines.