Clinical Trials Logo

Injury Prevention clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Injury Prevention.

Filter by:
  • Recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06410846 Recruiting - Injury Prevention Clinical Trials

Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Novel Neck Training Device

Start date: March 5, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Functional training focusing on dynamic, multiplanar eccentric loading of the neck's complex musculature may provide a unique training effect that may protect against neck injuries and mTBI. The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy and adherence of a 12-week TopSpin360 training regimen on important physiologic and performance outcome measures between an intervention group and a control group. The specific aims are 1) to compare differences in four physiologic neck measures and two TopSpin360 performance measures by group and gender, and 2) to evaluate program adherence.

NCT ID: NCT06212843 Recruiting - Injury Prevention Clinical Trials

Effect of 8 Week Plyometric Training on Injury Prevention in Domestic Cricket Players

Start date: August 1, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study aims to find the effectiveness of plyometric training on injury prevention of domestic cricket players. Players will be taken from Chakwal and a well designed plyometric plan will be implied on them for 8 weeks. After that the results will be compared with the other group who did not get any plyometric training to see the effectiveness of the treatment plan.

NCT ID: NCT06101251 Recruiting - Injury Prevention Clinical Trials

A Randomized Field Trial of Smartphone-based Feedback to Encourage Safe Driving

Start date: January 25, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study team are proposing to conduct a randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of focused feedback vs standard feedback and self-chosen vs assigned goals on driving behaviors targeted by behavior-based insurance apps: hard braking, fast acceleration, handheld phone use, and speeding. The interventions arms will receive feedback on their driving behaviors, tips for safe driving, and a UBI-like financial incentive. The Penn research team will use Meta advertisements to recruit for the study and determine eligibility via an online survey. Those who enroll will undergo a 6-week run-in period during which their driving trips will be monitored by a mobile app. Individuals with a sufficient number of trips during this period will be randomly assigned to one of four arms for the intervention period. Target enrollment is 1,300 participants (325 per trial arm). The power analysis assumed an attrition rate of 20% over the course of the study.

NCT ID: NCT05109325 Recruiting - Injury Prevention Clinical Trials

Project IntERact V2

Start date: January 24, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The present study is evaluating the efficacy of a behavioral intervention to reduce risky firearm carriage among a high risk sample of youth reporting recent firearm carriage and ownership of a smartphone.

NCT ID: NCT04958837 Recruiting - Postural Balance Clinical Trials

Effects of FIFA 11+ With Dynamic Core Stability Training on Balance and Dynamic Knee Valgus in Amateur Soccer Players

Start date: July 15, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The incidence of soccer-related injuries is reported to have the highest rate amongst all sports. To reduce the incidence of soccer injuries in youth and amateur soccer players, an injury prevention framework namely FIFA 11+ was established. Although the FIFA 11+ is a comprehensive warm-up and training program for soccer players, yet in the second component focusing on strength and plyometric training, the exercises consist of only static core training whereas dynamic core training is not included in the protocol. Hence this study will observe the effect of including dynamic core training targeting the remaining core musculature as well in the FIFA 11 + program for risk factor modification and correction of muscular imbalance.

NCT ID: NCT04056078 Recruiting - Shoulder Pain Clinical Trials

Nordic Throwing Shoulder Project (NTS - Project)

Start date: February 24, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

As a part of the Olympic program and with 150 countries in the international Handball Federation team handball has become a worldwide popular sport. Unfortunately, a large number of different types injuries have been reported among team handball players, and shoulder pain has some of the biggest incidence. In handball 44-75% of the athletes had a history of shoulder pain and a weekly prevalence of shoulder problems in 28% of the athletes. Shoulder pain has been reported to have an impact on the athletes' training activities, performance, and daily life. Several studies have established risk factors for shoulder injuries among overhead athletes, with a focus on the range of motion in glenohumeral joint (ROM), shoulder strength and scapula control. Injury occurrence results from a combination of possessing these different risk and the amount of throwing. Thereby training overhead sports must be considered a primary risk factor for shoulder injury. However, several studies have performed kinematics analysis of different throws techniques commonly used in team handball. But no studies havn't investigated kinematics and kinetics of different throwing techniques in relation to team handball players and the development of shoulder pain, and if a throwing technique or a wrong throwing technique stresses the shoulder joint more than other throwing techniques. In baseball it was found that youth pitchers throwing with a curveball was associated with a 52% increased risk of shoulder pain and the slider was associated with an 86% increased risk of elbow pain, and there was a significant association between number of throws and rate of shoulder pain. Two types of wind-ups are used in handball, and those different wind-ups also changed the throwing kinematics and throwing performance. Investigators found that the pelvis rotation was more important in the throw with the circular wind-up than in the whip-like wind up. In addition, the total throwing time was longer with the circular wind up. This could result in less stress and forces on the shoulder joint when compared with the whip like to reach the same performances. The questions arises whether the used throwing techniques of the handball players during training and matches are a risk factor for shoulder pain and if some throwing techniques cause bigger risk than other throwing techniques as the players could put more force on the shoulder and elbow joint.