Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

This study assess the (cost-)effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic Percutaneous Inguinal Ring Suturing (PIRS) technique for unilateral inguinal hernia repair in children aged 0-16 years.


Clinical Trial Description

Research question Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations in children. After open unilateral inguinal hernia repair, 6-8% of patients develops an inguinal hernia on the contralateral side. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia offers the opportunity to inspect the contralateral groin and repair an asymptomatic contralateral hernia, if present. Main question: What is the most (cost-)effective treatment strategy for unilateral inguinal hernia repair in children aged 0-16 years: the open or laparoscopic Percutaneous Inguinal Ring Suturing (PIRS) technique? Hypothesis The optimal treatment for children with an inguinal hernia is laparoscopic hernia repair, since the surgeon can inspect and possibly, repair, the contralateral groin. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair results in less operations and exposure to anaesthesia, less hospital admissions, lower costs and a better quality of life compared to open inguinal hernia repair. Study design Multicentre randomized controlled trial. Study population Children aged 0 - 16 years with a unilateral inguinal hernia. Intervention Inguinal hernia repair with the laparoscopic PIRS technique. Usual care/comparison Inguinal hernia repair with the open technique. Outcome Measures Primary: Number of operations related to inguinal hernia repair and cost-effectiveness (social and healthcare related costs). Secondary: complications, total duration of surgery (including anaesthesia and total duration of operating room time), post-operative pain, length of hospital stay, time to normal daily activities, cosmetic appearance, health-related quality of life. All outcome measures will be assessed within two years after the primary inguinal hernia correction. Sample size/data analysis 464 patients (power of 0.80, alpha 0.05). Cost-effectiveness analysis/budget impact analysis The economic evaluation will be assessed from a societal and health care perspective. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed in terms of QALYs and the primary and secondary outcomes. A budget impact analysis will be conducted using the "Budget Impact Analyse - leidraad en rekentool" of ZonMw. Missing data will be imputed. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT06451432
Study type Interventional
Source Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Contact Joep Derikx, prof.dr.
Phone 020 - 566 8000
Email j.derixk@amsterdamumc.nl
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date February 1, 2024
Completion date September 30, 2028

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03023462 - Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT04272320 - The Efficacy of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT03904888 - Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT03856710 - Self Fixating Versus Stapled Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT02240550 - A Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of ProFlor vs. Lichtenstein for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT01943760 - Tamadol Wound Infiltration in Children Under Inguinal Hernioplasty Phase 4
Completed NCT01679353 - Comparison of Analgesic Effect of Magnesium Added to Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine Alone in Caudal Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT01450345 - Efficacy of Pre-operative Oral Pregabalin in Ambulatory Inguinal Hernia Repair for Post Operative Pain Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT00968773 - Rebound Hernia Repair Device Mesh Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT01000116 - Fibrin Glue Versus Tacked Fixation in Groin Hernia Repair (TAPP) N/A
Completed NCT01117337 - Comparing Non-fixation of Mesh to Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair Phase 4
Terminated NCT00226161 - Chronic Pain After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy N/A
Completed NCT05837013 - Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair Under Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia N/A
Recruiting NCT05058378 - Correlation Between Spinal Anesthesia and Perfusion Index
Completed NCT01637818 - Long-term Follow-up of Lichtenstein's Operation Versus Mesh Plug Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT05879770 - Is the Use of Prolene as Sufficient as the Use of Wire in Shouldice Surgery to Keep the Recurrence Rate Low After One Year?
Completed NCT05159232 - Length of Hospital Stay in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Vs. Open Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia: A Randomised Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT05107986 - Laparoscopy in Complicated Groin Hernia
Active, not recruiting NCT04328597 - Portuguese Inguinal Hernia Cohort (PINE) Study
Completed NCT04033055 - Antalgic Efficacy of CycloMeshâ„¢ Soaked in Ropivacaine Hydrochloride in Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia. N/A