Clinical Trials Logo
  1. Home
  2. Inguinal Hernia
  3. NCT06240858

Clinical Study of Self-gripping Mesh in TAPP Versus Lichtenstein Hernia Repair

Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trial

Official title:
Clinical Study of Self-gripping Mesh in Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Versus Lichtenstein Hernia Repair

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this prospective study is to compare the clinical efficacy of self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hernia repair, in order to improve the outcome of inguinal hernia treatment. The main question it aims to answer is, in which procedure is the self-gripping mesh more effective. Participants will be divided into the TAPP group and the Lichtenstein group by random number table method, the TAPP group underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal preperitoneal hernia repair, and the Lichtenstein group underwent Lichtenstein hernia repair, both groups used self-gripping meshes. Researchers will compare the operation time, postoperative time out of bed, postoperative hospital stay, hospital costs and postoperative complications between the two groups to see the clinical efficacy of self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hernia repair.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details
NCT number NCT06240858
Study type Interventional
Source Second Hospital of Jilin University
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date March 1, 2022
Completion date November 30, 2023
View Details
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03023462 - Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT04272320 - The Efficacy of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT03904888 - Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT03856710 - Self Fixating Versus Stapled Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT02240550 - A Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of ProFlor vs. Lichtenstein for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT01679353 - Comparison of Analgesic Effect of Magnesium Added to Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine Alone in Caudal Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT01943760 - Tamadol Wound Infiltration in Children Under Inguinal Hernioplasty Phase 4
Recruiting NCT01450345 - Efficacy of Pre-operative Oral Pregabalin in Ambulatory Inguinal Hernia Repair for Post Operative Pain Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT00968773 - Rebound Hernia Repair Device Mesh Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT01000116 - Fibrin Glue Versus Tacked Fixation in Groin Hernia Repair (TAPP) N/A
Completed NCT01117337 - Comparing Non-fixation of Mesh to Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair Phase 4
Terminated NCT00226161 - Chronic Pain After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy N/A
Completed NCT05837013 - Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair Under Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia N/A
Recruiting NCT05058378 - Correlation Between Spinal Anesthesia and Perfusion Index
Completed NCT01637818 - Long-term Follow-up of Lichtenstein's Operation Versus Mesh Plug Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT05879770 - Is the Use of Prolene as Sufficient as the Use of Wire in Shouldice Surgery to Keep the Recurrence Rate Low After One Year?
Completed NCT05159232 - Length of Hospital Stay in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Vs. Open Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia: A Randomised Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT05107986 - Laparoscopy in Complicated Groin Hernia
Active, not recruiting NCT04328597 - Portuguese Inguinal Hernia Cohort (PINE) Study
Completed NCT04033055 - Antalgic Efficacy of CycloMesh™ Soaked in Ropivacaine Hydrochloride in Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia. N/A