Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Urinary Retention After Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intraoperative Urinary Catheter Versus no Catheter
NCT number | NCT03835351 |
Other study ID # | 19-070 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | March 7, 2019 |
Est. completion date | April 15, 2021 |
Verified date | April 2022 |
Source | The Cleveland Clinic |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This will be a randomized controlled study which will compare the rate of post-operative urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair between patients who receive an intra-operative urinary catheter and those who do not. The primary aim of the study is to determine if the use of intra-operative urinary catheter reduces the incidence of post-operative urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Specific patient inclusion criteria include all patients aged 18 years or older presenting for an elective unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia repair, who are able to tolerate general anesthesia and are considered eligible to have a hernia repair through a laparoscopic approach.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 491 |
Est. completion date | April 15, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | March 24, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - 18 years of age or older - Able to give informed consent - Unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia - Scheduled for elective inguinal hernia repair - Eligible to tolerate general anesthesia - Eligible to undergo minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair Exclusion Criteria: - Diagnosed with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) - Younger than 18 years old - Unable to give informed consent - Emergent inguinal hernia repairs ( acute incarceration or strangulation) - Unable to tolerate general anesthesia - Not eligible for minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Cleveland Clinic Comprehensive Hernia Center | Cleveland | Ohio |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
The Cleveland Clinic |
United States,
Arnold MR, Coakley KM, Fromke EJ, Groene SA, Prasad T, Colavita PD, Augenstein VA, Kercher KW, Heniford BT. Long-term assessment of surgical and quality-of-life outcomes between lightweight and standard (heavyweight) three-dimensional contoured mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surgery. 2019 Apr;165(4):820-824. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Nov 16. — View Citation
Blair AB, Dwarakanath A, Mehta A, Liang H, Hui X, Wyman C, Ouanes JPP, Nguyen HT. Postoperative urinary retention after inguinal hernia repair: a single institution experience. Hernia. 2017 Dec;21(6):895-900. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1661-4. Epub 2017 Sep 4. — View Citation
Jensen P, Mikkelsen T, Kehlet H. Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention--effect of local, regional, and general anesthesia: a review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 Nov-Dec;27(6):612-7. Review. — View Citation
Koch CA, Grinberg GG, Farley DR. Incidence and risk factors for urinary retention after endoscopic hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2006 Mar;191(3):381-5. — View Citation
Muysoms FE, Vanlander A, Ceulemans R, Kyle-Leinhase I, Michiels M, Jacobs I, Pletinckx P, Berrevoet F. A prospective, multicenter, observational study on quality of life after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with ProGrip laparoscopic, self-fixating mesh according to the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life Instrument. Surgery. 2016 Nov;160(5):1344-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 Jun 14. — View Citation
Patel JA, Kaufman AS, Howard RS, Rodriguez CJ, Jessie EM. Risk factors for urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3140-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4039-z. Epub 2015 Jan 1. — View Citation
Sivasankaran MV, Pham T, Divino CM. Incidence and risk factors for urinary retention following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2014 Feb;207(2):288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Nov 5. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants With Post Operative Urinary Retention | The rate of postoperative urinary retention requiring insertion of a urinary catheter | From the day of surgery until postoperative day 30 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Intraoperative Bladder Injuries | This will be determined by comparing the rates of intraoperative bladder injuries between the two study groups | Measured from Beginning of Anesthesia to the End of Anesthesia and up to 4 hours Post Operatively | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Who Have Complications From Intra-operative Urinary Catheter | This will be accomplished by analyzing the rates of urinary tract injury, infections and bladder injuries due to intraoperative catheter placement. | From the day of surgery until postoperative day 30 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Complications Urinary Catheter Who Develop Retention | This will be accomplished by analyzing the rates of urinary tract injury, or infections and bladder injuries due to catheter placement after patients develop post operative urinary retention. | From the day of surgery until postoperative day 30 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03023462 -
Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04272320 -
The Efficacy of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03904888 -
Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03856710 -
Self Fixating Versus Stapled Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02240550 -
A Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of ProFlor vs. Lichtenstein for Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01943760 -
Tamadol Wound Infiltration in Children Under Inguinal Hernioplasty
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01679353 -
Comparison of Analgesic Effect of Magnesium Added to Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine Alone in Caudal Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01450345 -
Efficacy of Pre-operative Oral Pregabalin in Ambulatory Inguinal Hernia Repair for Post Operative Pain
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00968773 -
Rebound Hernia Repair Device Mesh Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01000116 -
Fibrin Glue Versus Tacked Fixation in Groin Hernia Repair (TAPP)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01117337 -
Comparing Non-fixation of Mesh to Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT00226161 -
Chronic Pain After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05837013 -
Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair Under Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05058378 -
Correlation Between Spinal Anesthesia and Perfusion Index
|
||
Completed |
NCT01637818 -
Long-term Follow-up of Lichtenstein's Operation Versus Mesh Plug Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05879770 -
Is the Use of Prolene as Sufficient as the Use of Wire in Shouldice Surgery to Keep the Recurrence Rate Low After One Year?
|
||
Completed |
NCT05159232 -
Length of Hospital Stay in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Vs. Open Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia: A Randomised Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05107986 -
Laparoscopy in Complicated Groin Hernia
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04328597 -
Portuguese Inguinal Hernia Cohort (PINE) Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT04033055 -
Antalgic Efficacy of CycloMeshâ„¢ Soaked in Ropivacaine Hydrochloride in Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia.
|
N/A |