Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02748629
Other study ID # NKBNN/258/2015
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received April 12, 2016
Last updated October 4, 2016
Start date March 2015
Est. completion date October 2016

Study information

Verified date October 2016
Source Regional Health Center in Kartuzy, Poland
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Poland: Independent Bioethics Commission for Research
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this trial is to compare clinical outcomes and to analyze cost-effectiveness following self-gripping, sutureless Parietex ProGrip Mesh to traditional Lichtenstein Operation with lightweight polypropylene mesh.


Description:

Single-center patient-blinded randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh (Parietex ProGrip) and standard Lichtenstein method using lightweight polypropylene mesh. Patients will be randomly allocated to the Lichtenstein Operation (L) and ProGrip Repair (R) group. Patients will be followed for one year. The primary outcome measure are: postoperative pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Assessments will be made before the surgery, in the day of discharge, 1, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Secondary endpoints: recurrence rate, post-operative complications (short and long-term), foreign body sensation, incidence of surgical-site injury, costs, hospital stay, surgery duration, safety and patients satisfaction.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 143
Est. completion date October 2016
Est. primary completion date May 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- All patients with primary inguinal hernia

- Signed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- Recurrent hernia

- Emergency procedure

- Patient not willing to participate

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Covidien Parietex ProGrip Self-Fixating Mesh

Lightweight Polypropylene Mesh (<38g/m2 after absorption)
Serag Wiessner SERAMESH® PA 15x10 cm

Locations

Country Name City State
Poland Regional Health Center in Kartuzy Kartuzy

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Regional Health Center in Kartuzy, Poland Medical University of Gdansk

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Poland, 

References & Publications (1)

Sanders DL, Nienhuijs S, Ziprin P, Miserez M, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Smeds S. Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with suture fixation of lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2014 Oct;101(11):1373-82; — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Incidence of post-operative pain and its intensity using VAS Scale Assessment will be made using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). 12 Months No
Secondary Rate of foreign body sensation - Subjective feeling of discomfort in the groin Foreign body sensation is a patients' subjective feeling of discomfort in the groin. Assesment will be made by phone questionnaire. 12 Months No
Secondary Hernia recurrence rate Recurrence rate is number of hernia recurrences after surgery (can only be diagnosed by surgeon via clinical examination) 12 Months Yes
Secondary Post-operative complications Short and Longterm complications: surgical site injury, hematoma, seroma, testicle ischemia, chronic pain) 12 Months Yes
Secondary Duration of surgery Day of surgery No
Secondary Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety] 12 Months Yes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03023462 - Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT04272320 - The Efficacy of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT03904888 - Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT03856710 - Self Fixating Versus Stapled Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT02240550 - A Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of ProFlor vs. Lichtenstein for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT01943760 - Tamadol Wound Infiltration in Children Under Inguinal Hernioplasty Phase 4
Completed NCT01679353 - Comparison of Analgesic Effect of Magnesium Added to Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine Alone in Caudal Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT01450345 - Efficacy of Pre-operative Oral Pregabalin in Ambulatory Inguinal Hernia Repair for Post Operative Pain Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT00968773 - Rebound Hernia Repair Device Mesh Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT01000116 - Fibrin Glue Versus Tacked Fixation in Groin Hernia Repair (TAPP) N/A
Completed NCT01117337 - Comparing Non-fixation of Mesh to Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair Phase 4
Terminated NCT00226161 - Chronic Pain After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy N/A
Completed NCT05837013 - Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair Under Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia N/A
Recruiting NCT05058378 - Correlation Between Spinal Anesthesia and Perfusion Index
Completed NCT01637818 - Long-term Follow-up of Lichtenstein's Operation Versus Mesh Plug Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT05879770 - Is the Use of Prolene as Sufficient as the Use of Wire in Shouldice Surgery to Keep the Recurrence Rate Low After One Year?
Completed NCT05159232 - Length of Hospital Stay in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Vs. Open Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia: A Randomised Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT05107986 - Laparoscopy in Complicated Groin Hernia
Active, not recruiting NCT04328597 - Portuguese Inguinal Hernia Cohort (PINE) Study
Completed NCT04033055 - Antalgic Efficacy of CycloMeshâ„¢ Soaked in Ropivacaine Hydrochloride in Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia. N/A