Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trial
Outpatient services in Germany are less controlled by external quality assurance programs. Comprehensive outcome data for benchmarking or health-care decision-making are missing e.g. for day case surgery. A quality-of-life instrument specific to hernia repair with mesh has been recently proposed (Carolinas Comfort Scale, CCS) .This study evaluates the integration of CSS as part of a multicentre quality assurance scheme for day-case (outpatient) surgery.b.The Study Group on "Quality assurance in ambulatory hernia surgery" has developed and standardized Operation technique for 3D Implants. As a consequence, any deviation must be documented by the standard. The extension to other centers according to a standardized protocol took place (shadowing to learn the operational standards, training in documentation, Minimum quantity 30 interventions per year, etc.).
- Rationale
1. In the care of inguinal hernias exists a considerable diversity of methods.
Germany is expected to experience a significant shift of service delivery from
inpatient to outpatient care within the next few years. As a result of this, the
need for quality-controlled procedures in the ambulatory use has emerged.
2. A first register phase for open inguinal hernia was designed in 2010 and is now
almost finished. After the evaluation of approximately 6,000 patient records, the
process is considered to be extremely successful.
3. As a central result of this first register phase can already be stated that the
integration of 3D meshes in a standardized process proved to be extremely
effective in open inguinal hernia. In all of the examined relevant parameters, a
quality of care well above the status quo could be exhibited.
4. This data quality is unique to the hernia care not only in Germany. In Contrast,
the results also achieved considerable international attention. Hence, the working
group received the Fruchaud prize for presenting the results of the American
Hernia Society 2013. (see Annex, www.americanherniasociety.org)
- Objective
a. Since this approach has proven successful in the first register phase in every
respect, it is now to be continued for another two years in order to develop the basis
to establish this concept as widespread (outpatient) standard. The central question
will be investigated of whether the outstanding results of register phase 1 will also
occur in a wide and distributed application to more centers. If this can be proved, the
conditions based on worldwide unique scientific data (methodology and follow-up rates,
see below) are created to establish the standard surgical procedure with central
integration of 3D meshes (UPP UHS) as gold standard against the Lichtenstein method in
the outpatient sector.
- Design
1. Prospective multicenter observational study of online-based (daily updated)
recording of all relevant pre-, peri-and postoperative data, including patient- as
well as physician-specific follow up.
2. Analysis of the most relevant patient-specific endpoints recurrence, pain and
quality of life with a 4, 12 and 52 weeks follow-up and the use of
psychometrically validated Carolina Comfort Scale (anonymous and
tamper-resistant).
3. Significant expansion of the participating centers with a special comparison of
the quality of results between newly added centers and centers, that have been
proven already.
4. Duration: 01/01/2014 - 12/31/2015 with an additional one-year follow-up to
12/31/2016.
;
Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Prospective
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03023462 -
Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04272320 -
The Efficacy of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03904888 -
Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03856710 -
Self Fixating Versus Stapled Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02240550 -
A Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of ProFlor vs. Lichtenstein for Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01943760 -
Tamadol Wound Infiltration in Children Under Inguinal Hernioplasty
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01679353 -
Comparison of Analgesic Effect of Magnesium Added to Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine Alone in Caudal Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01450345 -
Efficacy of Pre-operative Oral Pregabalin in Ambulatory Inguinal Hernia Repair for Post Operative Pain
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00968773 -
Rebound Hernia Repair Device Mesh Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01000116 -
Fibrin Glue Versus Tacked Fixation in Groin Hernia Repair (TAPP)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01117337 -
Comparing Non-fixation of Mesh to Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT00226161 -
Chronic Pain After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05837013 -
Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair Under Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05058378 -
Correlation Between Spinal Anesthesia and Perfusion Index
|
||
Completed |
NCT01637818 -
Long-term Follow-up of Lichtenstein's Operation Versus Mesh Plug Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05879770 -
Is the Use of Prolene as Sufficient as the Use of Wire in Shouldice Surgery to Keep the Recurrence Rate Low After One Year?
|
||
Completed |
NCT05159232 -
Length of Hospital Stay in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Vs. Open Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia: A Randomised Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05107986 -
Laparoscopy in Complicated Groin Hernia
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04328597 -
Portuguese Inguinal Hernia Cohort (PINE) Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT04033055 -
Antalgic Efficacy of CycloMeshâ„¢ Soaked in Ropivacaine Hydrochloride in Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia.
|
N/A |