Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Patient Perceived Pain and Satisfaction Between Lightweight and Heavyweight Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
This study will be comparing the patients overall satisfaction of two different meshes used in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs.
This is a clinical trial comparing standard therapy in the use of either lightweight or
heavy mesh for the repair of inguinal hernias. Both types of these meshes have been approved
for surgical correction but subjective comparisons of patient overall satisfaction and
perceived outcomes have not been measured. The investigators intend to measure certain
subjective data in the form of a questionnaire will be issued to the patient preoperatively,
one week, one month, six months, and one year after the surgery There is no recent
literature comparing subjective data between two meshes called Ultra Pro and Surgi Pro. The
biological effects of these meshes have identical properties as far as the healing process
and inflammation as well as the low rate of infection. The main difference is the material
that these meshes are composed of. The Ultra Pro is made of Prolene while the Surgi Pro is
made of polypropylene.
The risks are not increased anymore than that for normal surgical complications. They each
have the same post operative risks including bleeding, infection and pain, but the
investigators are investigating a possible subjective difference between these two separate
meshes that are currently used.
;
Time Perspective: Prospective
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03023462 -
Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04272320 -
The Efficacy of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03904888 -
Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03856710 -
Self Fixating Versus Stapled Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02240550 -
A Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of ProFlor vs. Lichtenstein for Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01679353 -
Comparison of Analgesic Effect of Magnesium Added to Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine Alone in Caudal Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01943760 -
Tamadol Wound Infiltration in Children Under Inguinal Hernioplasty
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01450345 -
Efficacy of Pre-operative Oral Pregabalin in Ambulatory Inguinal Hernia Repair for Post Operative Pain
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00968773 -
Rebound Hernia Repair Device Mesh Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01000116 -
Fibrin Glue Versus Tacked Fixation in Groin Hernia Repair (TAPP)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01117337 -
Comparing Non-fixation of Mesh to Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT00226161 -
Chronic Pain After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05837013 -
Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair Under Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05058378 -
Correlation Between Spinal Anesthesia and Perfusion Index
|
||
Completed |
NCT01637818 -
Long-term Follow-up of Lichtenstein's Operation Versus Mesh Plug Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05879770 -
Is the Use of Prolene as Sufficient as the Use of Wire in Shouldice Surgery to Keep the Recurrence Rate Low After One Year?
|
||
Completed |
NCT05159232 -
Length of Hospital Stay in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Vs. Open Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia: A Randomised Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05107986 -
Laparoscopy in Complicated Groin Hernia
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04328597 -
Portuguese Inguinal Hernia Cohort (PINE) Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT04033055 -
Antalgic Efficacy of CycloMeshâ„¢ Soaked in Ropivacaine Hydrochloride in Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia.
|
N/A |