Clinical Trials Logo

Inguinal Hernia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Inguinal Hernia.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT05152654 Completed - Pain, Acute Clinical Trials

Is it Necessary to Fix Mesh in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair

Start date: December 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Inguinal hernias are one of the most common diseases in general surgery practice. In a multicenter study conducted in Germany, inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations. Until the last 20 years, after Lichtenstein described tension-free mesh hernia repair, this method was the gold standard in inguinal hernia surgery. This method was advantageous in terms of both less recurrence and less postoperative pain compared to tension methods. With the development of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic hernia surgery was first described by Dr. Ger in 1992. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is based on the principles of preperitoneal repair described by Stoppa in open surgery. Its advantages over laparoscopic surgery are; Less post-operative pain, rapid recovery, reduction in nerve damage and chronic pain, and reduced recurrence rate. However, the disadvantage is that the learning curve is longer and higher cost. Two commonly used laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgeries are Trans Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) methods. Although both are preperitoneal repair methods, less intraperitoneal organ damage, less intra-abdominal adhesion formation, and no need for peritoneal sheath repair are the advantages of the TEP method. For this reason, TEP method has been the preferred method today. Various methods have been tried in order not to change the location of the mesh placed in the TEP method. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia is one of the most debated issues. The most common methods for fixation are tacker, tissue adhesive, or suturing the mesh. However, fixing the mesh using a tacker can cause chronic pain. Tissue adhesives are not preferred because tissue adhesives have high costs and sometimes cause allergic reactions. The method in which the mesh is sewn to the pubic bone is avoided by surgeons because it prolongs the operation time. To avoid chronic pain after surgery, the idea was not to fix the mesh. The major drawback of this method is that the mesh may slip and cause recurrence.This study aimed to reveal the difference between the amount of migration and the amount of post-operative pain between detecting the mesh and not detecting it

NCT ID: NCT05107986 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Laparoscopy in Complicated Groin Hernia

Start date: September 1, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study assessed the outcomes of laparoscopic repair in complicated groin hernia. Laparoscopic approach in cases of complicated groin hernia can achieve desirable patient outcomes without major complications, provided good patient selection and expertise. This study provides an insight to the outcomes from the procedure in low resource setting of Nepal.

NCT ID: NCT05069142 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Peri-Operative Rehab Program for Inguinal Hernia Repair Surgery

Start date: January 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgeries, with more than 20 million performed globally each year. It is estimated that approximately 15% of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair will experience persistent post-surgical pain that could last months to years. Evidence from related procedures indicates that better surgical preparation through pre-operative exercise and education (i.e. Prehabilitation) followed by ongoing post-surgical rehabilitation leads to more rapid recovery, return to activities and lower likelihood of persistent post-surgical pain. The investigators will determine the feasibility of a peri-operative rehabilitation program (pre- and post-surgery) and our study protocol for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair surgery. The investigators hypothesize that: 1) our peri-operative intervention will be feasible and safe to undertake within a clinical setting; 2) adequate numbers will be enrolled to justify a larger trial; and that 3) our outcome measurement protocol will provide meaningful information with high response rate and low attrition after 3 months.

NCT ID: NCT05011786 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Open and Laparoscopic Hernia Repair. A Comparative Study

Start date: January 1, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational

A retrospective comparative study in a pediatric surgery center to compare the outcomes of 2 approaches of hernia repair in the pediatric population.

NCT ID: NCT04891601 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Mesh Alone VS Combined Mesh and Darn in the Management of Primary Inguinal Hernia in Adult Males

Start date: January 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

A prospective randomized study involved 228 individuals with primary inguinal hernia, operated in our departments, between January 2015 to February 2018. The duration of hospital stay, operative time, duration of returning to routine activities, postsurgical sequels and recurrence rates estimated. We randomly allocated it into two groups: mesh repair was applied to 166 patients (Group 1) and combined both mesh, and darn repair applied to 162 patients (Group 2).

NCT ID: NCT04888078 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Bassini Inguinal Hernia Repair: Obsolete Or Still A Viable Surgical Option?

Start date: January 1, 2006
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Retrospective review of hernia surgery patients at HHMcGuire VAMC focusing on repair type and postoperative complications.

NCT ID: NCT04806828 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Preoperative Score of Inguinal Hernias. Is it Useful to Predict Outcomes

POINTHER
Start date: January 1, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

To analyze and validate a preoperative score of difficulty of inguinal hernias and its correlation with postoperative outcomes

NCT ID: NCT04764760 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Biomechanically Compatible,Minimally Invasive Technique for Recurrence Free Groin Hernia Repair

Start date: January 1987
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

"A bio-mechanically compatible, minimally invasive technique for recurrence-free groin hernia repair by implantation of Tensiflex mesh prosthesis for the enhancement of the tissue tensile strength of the fascia transversalis."

NCT ID: NCT04762264 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

MR Imaging of the 3D Inguinal Hernia Scaffold ProFlor

Start date: January 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Demonstrating through MRI sequuences the regenerative features of the 3D inguinal hernia scaffold ProFlor

NCT ID: NCT04750512 Completed - Postoperative Pain Clinical Trials

Comparing Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) and Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Inguinal Hernia

TAPESP
Start date: January 11, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The Erectore Spinae Plane Block (ESP Block) is a recently described technique for regional anesthesia that has shown promising results in the treatment of pain after thoracic surgery. It involves the injection of local anesthetic behind the musculature of the back. The investigators intend to compare this technique with a more standardized one, the TAP Block, which involves injection of anesthetic behind the musculature of the abdomen. 50 patients undergoing robotic inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia will be randomly selected to receive, in addition to general anesthesia, either the ESP block or the TAP block. Patients receiving an ESP Block will also receive an injection of saline solution in the TAP injection site, and the other way around. This will prevent preconceived ideas on either technique to influence the evaluationso of the effect. Pain scores and consumption of pain medication will be recorded during the 24 hours following the operation to compare the effect of the two techniques.