Comparison of 4 Influenza Vaccines in Seniors

Influenza Vaccine Clinical Trial

— PCIRNRT09  

Official title:

Controlled Comparison in Canadian Seniors of Seasonal Influenza Vaccines for 2011-2012

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01368796
• Other study ID #: H11-01457
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• First received: June 6, 2011
• Last updated: April 14, 2015
• Start date: July 2011
• Est. completion date: May 2012

Study information

• Verified date: April 2015
• Source: University of British Columbia
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Canada: Health Canada
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Based on information from several years of looking at Influenza vaccination doctors know that:

• Older adults suffer the worst illness and most deaths caused by Influenza illness of all age groups.

• Older adults do not seem to get as good a level of protection as younger adults after getting the usual seasonal Influenza vaccine.

Because of this information doctors wonder if one of the new seasonal Influenza vaccines is more effective or more acceptable.

This study has been designed to answer some of these questions. On this study doctors will compare 2 new vaccines against the usual seasonal influenza vaccine for protectiveness using several different testing methods (including the usual tests) and for acceptability.

Description:

This study is prospective, multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded, controlled, parallel group study of 3 licensed seasonal influenza vaccine products conducted in seniors, with a 4th vaccine included in a substudy of cellular immune responses.

Ambulatory adults 65+ years of age, in good health or with stable health conditions, given TIV within the past 2 years, will be recruited in multiple Canadian centres. Subjects can be dwelling in the community or in centers providing minimal assisted living support. A total of 930 subjects will be enrolled.

Subjects will be centrally (electronically) randomized to receive either TIV, IDV or AIV on Day 0. Three blood samples will be collected (1 pre and 2 post vaccination) to measure HAI antibody responses to each virus strain (H1N1, H3N2 and B) in each vaccine, using standardized assays. Randomly selected subsets of sera from each study group will also be tested for neutralizing antibody and for cross-protection against drift variants of H3N2, H1N1 and B viruses. In a subset of subjects in Vancouver, randomization assignments will include TIV2 and extra blood samples will be obtained 0, 21 and 72 days post vaccination for CMI testing. Safety assessments will be conducted on Day 7, Day 21 and Day 180 following vaccination. Acceptability of each product, reflecting the frequency, severity and tolerability of adverse effects, will be assessed.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 953
• Est. completion date: May 2012
• Est. primary completion date: December 2011
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 65 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Written informed consent provided by the subject, who can be male or female

• Subjects who the investigator believes can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol (i.e. return for follow-up visits, record safety observations and able to converse with study personnel including by personal telephone)

• Age 65 years or older at Visit 1

• Generally good health (stable chronic conditions acceptable), living independently or with minimal assistance (Clinical Frailty score 1-5) (33) and able to attend clinic appointments

• Receipt of at least one dose of TIV within the previous 2 influenza seasons, documented by written record or attested by a confident personal recollection. This refers to the trivalent seasonal vaccine, not the H1N12009 pandemic vaccine.

Exclusion Criteria:

• receipt of non-study influenza vaccine for 2011-12

• receipt of any live vaccine within 4 weeks or inactivated vaccine within one week of Visit 1 or planned administration of any non-study vaccines between Visits 1 and 2

• systemic hypersensitivity to influenza vaccine, hen's eggs or other vaccine constituent (eg neomycin sulphate, kanamycin, formalin)

• severe reaction to any previous influenza vaccine or vaccine component

• bleeding disorder, including anticoagulant therapy or thrombocytopenia, that contraindicates IM injection or blood collection (does not include daily low-dose ASA).

• incapacity to provide fully informed consent or be attentive to follow-up observations, resulting from cognitive impairment, abuse of alcohol, drug addiction

• lack of telephone access, inadequate fluency in English (or French in applicable jurisdictions), uncertain availability during the 3 week study participation period or for the 6 month follow-up visit

• immune compromise resulting from disease or immunosuppressive systemic medication use within 3 months of V1

• receipt of blood or blood product within 3 months of V1

• unstable medical condition, as indicated by a requirement for hospitalization or a substantial medication change to stabilize said condition within previous 3 months

• Clinical Frailty score of 6-7 (moderately frail or severely frail)

• history of Guillain-Barré syndrome

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Prevention

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Influenza Vaccine
• Influenza, Human

Intervention

Biological:
• Agriflu
0.5mL dose IM vaccination
• Fluad
0.5mL dose of vaccine given IM
• Intanza
0.5mL dose vaccine given IM
• Vaxigrip
0.5mL dose vaccine given IM

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	Canadian Centre for Vaccinology Dalhousie University	Halifax	Nova Scotia
Canada	McMaster University	Hamilton	Ontario
Canada	McGill University Health Center - Vaccine Study Center	Montreal	Quebec
Canada	The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa	Ottawa	Ontario
Canada	Unité de Recherche en Santé Publique (CHUQ),	Quebec City	Quebec
Canada	University of Toronto, Mt Sinai Hospital	Toronto	Ontario
Canada	University of British Columbia, VITALiTY Research Center	Vancouver	British Columbia
Canada	University of Manitoba, Department of Medicine	Winnipeg	Manitoba

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of British Columbia	PHAC/CIHR Influenza Research Network

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	HAI response	The primary outcome measures will be the 3-week post-vaccination immune (HAI) responses to the 3 vaccine strains present in each product, assessed by the EMEA/CHMP criteria for evaluation of immune responses to influenza vaccines in persons >60 years of age.	Day 0; Day 21; Day 180	No
Secondary	Seroprotection rates using microneutralization titres and cytokine testing	As secondary immunologic outcomes seroprotection rates will be compared between the products using a higher titer (=160) as threshold. Microneutralization titers will be compared among products at the 3 sampling points, using sera from 100 subjects per group. Cross-protection afforded by each vaccine against drift variants of H3N2, H1N1 and B viruses will be assessed using serum panels selected from 50 subjects in each group. Cellular immune responses elicited will be compared in subgroups of 30 subjects per vaccine in the CMI subjset.	Day 0; Day 21; and Day 70	No
Secondary	Safety and Acceptability	Safety and acceptability of the vaccines will also be examined and compared as the safety outcomes. The primary outcome measurements will be the rates of local adverse events (pain, redness, swelling, itchiness) as rates of general adverse events are not expected to differ substantially among the products.	Days 0-6; Day 21; Day 70; and Day 180	Yes