View clinical trials related to Influenza, Human.
Filter by:This study evaluates the statistics of influenza and acute respiratory viral infections (ARVI) management in outpatient sites in Russia, Armenia, Moldova and Georgia (epidemiology: disease severity and bacterial exacerbations; patients demography; treatment duration and timelines; safety; quality of treatment) in routine clinical practice with focus on drug therapy and usage of interferons' inducers.
The purpose of the study is to compare Emergency Department patients who undergo influenza testing using an FDA-approved point-of-care device (Cobas Liat Influenza A/B assay) located in the ED, to patients whose samples are sent to the BMC central laboratory. Patients who agree to participate will have their samples randomly assigned to be tested on either at the core lab, or on the POC device. The current turnaround time for samples sent to the laboratory is approximately two hours; investigators expect that the point of care device can reduce this time. Investigators will determine if the time to disposition and the administration of antibiotics is different in the group undergoing POC influenza testing compared to those undergoing laboratory-based influenza testing
The purpose of this study was to determine whether moderate-severe endpoints (including high fever, lower respiratory tract disease, acute otitis media, or serious extra-pulmonary complications) were predictive of hospitalization, intensive care admission, antibiotic use and other complications in children under 8 years of age.
The live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is made up of weakened influenza viruses given into the nose and in early studies was shown to be better than the standard influenza vaccine at preventing infections in children. However, more recently, it has performed less well and it may also work less well in Sub-Saharan Africa. Not only do the investigators not know why this is, but the investigators also do not fully understand why LAIV produces stronger nasal antibody responses in some individuals but not others. Usually harmless bacteria that are present in participants noses can influence how our immune system works and variations in these may explain differences in how LAIV works. The project will recruit children given LAIV in the Gambia to gain further understanding of these issues. The investigators will measure a variety of responses to LAIV, including genes that can change their expression early after vaccination and use advanced computational techniques to identify new relationships between these genes and other LAIV responses. The investigators will also see whether nasal bacterial profiles in children who respond to LAIV are different from those who do not. In addition, the investigators will alter these bacteria in a subset of children with antibiotics and see whether this affects both nasal gene expression and later responses to LAIV.
RAPID-LTCF is a stratified, block-randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a simple ARI case definition, rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT) with wireless transmission of results, and provision of infection control guidance when influenza is detected. Because of the nature of the intervention, blinding is not possible. Sites will be initially recruited for a study of "respiratory infections within LTCFs." After acceptance into the study, sites will be matched in terms of bed capacity, location, and other features prior to randomization.
This study is a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase Ⅲ Trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of a single dose of Live-Attenuated influenza Vaccine(LAIV) among healthy children and adolescents aged 3-17 years.
FLU-v is a vaccine that aims to protect against a wide range of flu viruses. The purpose of this study is to measure the immune responses induced by FLU-v vaccine. This study will look at how safe FLU-v is when administered and how successful it is in preventing flu or reducing the severity of the flu symptoms. The study requires 222 healthy volunteers 18-60 years old. Participation in the study will take a maximum of 7 months and consists of 5 visits. During visit 1, subjects will be examined by a doctor to make sure they are eligible to enter the study. A 15ml blood sample (a tablespoon) will be taken to check general health followed by a general physical exam. Medical history and some personal information will be collected. Subjects that have received the traditional flu vaccine in the past 6 months, and those females who are pregnant or breastfeeding will not be allowed in the study. Subjects of childbearing age must agree to use effective contraceptive methods. At visit 2, subjects will be randomly allocated to one of the four treatment groups summarised below: - Treatment 1: FLU-v (test vaccine) at the start of the study (Day 0) and then again 21 days later - Treatment 2: FLU-v (test vaccine) with an additional substance added [known as Montanide ISA 51] which improves the effect of the test vaccine. Injection will be given on Day 0 and then Placebo (no test vaccine) alone 21 days later - Treatment 3: Placebo (no test vaccine) injection on Day 0 and then 21 days later - Treatment 4: Placebo (no test vaccine) with an additional substance added [known as Montanide ISA 51] on Day 0 and then Placebo (no test vaccine) alone 21 days later Treatment will be injected under the skin in the upper arm on day 0 (visit 2) and 21 days later (visit 3). Blood samples will be taken before treatment (day 0), and on days 42 (visit 4) and 180 (visit 5) to the immune responses induced by the vaccine. Subjects will be asked to complete a diary card to write down any side effects that they may experience after vaccination. Subjects will also be asked to complete another diary card to document any flu-like symptoms experienced between December 2016 and March 2017, this time is officially considered as the flu season. During this period, if the subject experiences flu-like symptoms, a collection of a nose and tonsil swab will be arranged by the study site to confirm whether they have the flu or not.
In this open label, single centre, pilot randomized controlled clinical trial the investigators aim to compare the immunogenicity and safety of a new influenza vaccination strategy consisting in the topical administration of imiquimod at the injection site before vaccination vs. a standard intramuscular vaccine injection in SOT recipients and HIV-infected individuals. The investigators planned to enroll 70 outpatients patients (50% solid-organ transplant recipients and 50% HIV-infected patients) regularly followed at the Transplantation center and the Infectious disease outpatients' clinics of the Lausanne University Hospital. Study participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive the standard intramuscular vaccine (control group) or a topical application of an imiquimod containing cream followed by intramuscular (imiquimod-IM) or intradermal (imiquimod-ID) vaccine injection. After vaccination participants will be followed for a period of 180 days. Blood samples will be drawn at baseline and at day 21 and 180 for assessment of immunogenicity. Safety outcomes will be assessed immediately after vaccine administration, and at day 7 (phone call), 21 and 180.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of one dose of H7N9 pandemic live attenuated influenza vaccine (H7N9 pLAIV) followed by AS03-adjuvanted H7N9 pandemic inactivated influenza vaccine (H7N9 pIIV).
This is a randomized clinical trial to assess the effect of rapid, near point-of-care testing for multiple common respiratory viruses and bacteria on antibiotic and anti-influenza medication use in emergency department (ED) patients with symptoms of influenza-like illness (ILI) and/or upper respiratory infection (URI).