View clinical trials related to Influenza A.
Filter by:The present clinical phase I study designed to examine the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of the medicinal product - Vaccine vector against influenza A - in healthy volunteers after a single dose in the three groups with dose escalation.
Adopt the design of random, blind method and placebo to parallel control and progressive methods of groups to study and evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of influenza A (H7N9) vaccine (two types, one type with two specifications) on people of different ages. The vaccines used for testing include: influenza A (H7N9) virus inactivated vaccine/split influenza vaccine (15μg /dose), influenza A (H7N9) virus inactivated vaccine/split influenza vaccine (30μg / dose), influenza A (H7N9) virus inactivated vaccine/whole influenza vaccine (7.5μg / dose) and influenza A (H7N9) virus inactivated vaccine/ whole influenza vaccine (15μg / dose). The study between different subgroups was carried out in an orderly and progressive manner, that is, each kind of vaccine by the dose is from low to high according to the order of age from old to young. Firstly, the study on 15μg/dose split vaccine group (aged 18 and above) and 7.5μg/dose whole-virus vaccine group (aged 18 and above) was carried out and then the study on 15μg/dose split vaccine group (aged 12-17) and 7.5μg/dose whole-virus vaccine group (aged 12-17) was conducted upon 7-day safety was confirmed after the vaccination, finally the study on 30μg/dose split vaccine group (aged 18 and above) and 15μg/dose whole-virus vaccine group (aged 18 and above) was done. By that analogy for the same conditions, the next group of test can be done after the 7-day safety of the last group of vaccine is confirmed. Subjects and researchers didn't know the formulations of the vaccines used. The vaccine is injected into the upper arm deltoid muscle. After 30 minutes of field observation on safety, the subjects' axillary temperature shall be recorded on the Record Book prepared by the research and local and systemic reactions to injection at the 6th, 24th, 48th, and 72th hour and on the 4th, 8th, 21st and 30th day shall also be recorded. This paper collected 5 serum samples: day 0 (before the first-dose vaccination), day 4 (after the first-dose vaccination), day 21 (before the second-dose vaccination), day 25 (fourth day after the second-dose vaccination) and day 42 (21st day after the second-dose vaccination), of which, blood samples on day 0, 21 and 42 should be stored at 18℃ for antibody detection and the remaining 2 blood samples are only used for blood routine examination, routine urine test, blood biochemistry and other laboratory examinations.
This study is to compare the efficacy and safety of VIS410 in combination with oseltamivir vs oseltamivir alone in severely ill subjects with influenza A infection requiring oxygen support.
The primary purpose of this study is to validate the sensitivity and specificity of the Respirio Flu Test and the eLab Flu Test in detecting Influenza A as compared to the gold standard for detection, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR). The secondary aims are to: Validate the sensitivity and specificity of the Respirio Flu Test and the eLab Flu Test in detecting Influenza B as compared to the gold standard for detection, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR); Evaluate the correct interpretation of the Respirio Flu Test by subjects with influenza-like symptoms; Evaluate the subjects' satisfaction with the convenience, comfort and ease of use of the Respirio Flu Test.
This is a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single dose study in otherwise healthy adults with acute uncomplicated seasonal influenza A to assess the safety and tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of MHAA4549A.
The primary purpose of this study is to validate the sensitivity and specificity of the Respirio Flu Test in detecting Influenza A, when used by subjects, as compared to the gold standard for detection, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR). The secondary aims are to: - validate the sensitivity and specificity of the Respirio Flu Test in detecting Influenza B , when used by subjects, as compared to the gold standard for detection, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR). - assess agreement (positive and negative) between Respirio Flu Test and Sofia® Influenza A+B Test in detecting Influenza A; - assess agreement (positive and negative) between Respirio Flu Test and Sofia® Influenza A+B Test in detecting Influenza B; - evaluate the correct interpretation of the Respirio Flu Test results by subjects with Influenza-like illness symptoms; - evaluate the subjects' satisfaction with the convenience, comfort and ease of use of the Respirio Flu Test; - evaluate the subjects' comprehension of the Respirio Flu Test labelling; and - establish the minimum sample weight required to achieve a result with the Respirio Flu Test.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the antiviral effect, as measured by viral titer in nasal secretions in adults with acute uncomplicated seasonal influenza A following administration of VX-787.
Influenza (the flu) is a common illness that usually occurs in autumn and winter. The flu is usually mild, but can cause serious illness or death. The purpose of this study is to test the safety and effectiveness of an antibody against the flu (called intravenous hyperimmune immunoglobulin or IVIG) in people who are hospitalized for severe flu.
This study is to evaluate the efficacy of CT-P27 measured by quantitative PCR viral load from nasopharyngeal mucosa, compared to placebo.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and immunogenicity of an influenza A vaccine (vaccine: FP-01.1), as compared to placebo, in healthy volunteers following a dose of influenza A virus.