Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Enrolling by invitation
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05849090 |
Other study ID # |
158712 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Enrolling by invitation |
Phase |
Early Phase 1
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
March 27, 2023 |
Est. completion date |
March 2028 |
Study information
Verified date |
November 2023 |
Source |
University of Utah |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The investigators overall aim of this study is to determine the difference in 6-month
infection rates in patients treated with the combined vancomycin and tobramycin (VT) powder
compared to the standard of care (SC).
In order to evaluate this objective, the investigators propose the following specific aims
for the pilot study:
Specific Aim 1: Assess VT and SC patient enrollment, randomization and early clinical
follow-up. Hypothesis: This study will successfully enroll and randomize 50 patients, 25 into
each treatment group and will achieve 85% clinical follow-up at 6-months post-ED admission
date.
Open fracture patients/families that meet study inclusion/exclusion criteria will be
approached by a study team member for informed consent. After providing consent, patients
will be appropriately randomized to either VT or SC treatment. Patients will be clinically
followed at regular intervals up to 6 months post-surgery. Enrollment, appropriate
randomization and surgical allocation, and clinical follow-up will be evaluated.
Specific Aim 2: Compare infection rates, cultures and patient characteristics between groups.
Hypothesis: VT will have a lower infection rate than the SC group. Additionally,
randomization will create an equal distribution of patient demographics as well as fracture
severity and soft tissue damage, as classified by the Gustilo-Anderson Classification System
(GA).
Specific Aim 3: Compare local wound healing and fracture healing between VT group and SC
group. Hypothesis: VT will have less rates of wound healing complications due to decreased
infections. No local wound irritation or wound closure issues will be seen between groups.
There will be no difference in fracture healing between groups.
Description:
Open limb fractures are severe orthopedic injuries and at an increased risk for complications
including nonunion and infection. Rates of infection are dependent upon features such as
extent of soft tissue trauma, patient characteristics, degree of contamination and modifiable
factors such as time to surgical debridement and IV (intravenous) antibiotics. Surgical
debridement within 24 hours and IV antibiotics are the current standard of care, but despite
advances in care, the infection rates for these injuries has remained stable over the last
several decades.
Possible explanations for this stagnation in care may be related to the current standard of
care and the pathophysiology of open fractures. There is significant soft-tissue damage in
open fractures, which compromises local vasculature leading to devascularized soft tissue and
bone. This devitalized tissue serves as a nidus for infection, a base for biofilm production
and reduces the level of systemic antibiotics delivered to the zone of injury. Local
antibiotic therapy has the potential to overcome these challenges, by allowing a high
concentration of antibiotics to be delivered to the devitalized tissue. Additional benefits
of local antibiotics are their powdered form, which is stable, easy to transport, and can be
applied immediately in austere situations without the need for IV access. A recent randomized
control trial found a 4% decrease risk of infection following powdered vancomycin placement
at the time of hardware fixation. However, a recent meta-analysis showed nearly a 12% risk
reduction in open fractures treated with local antibiotics when compared to the standard of
care. However, this meta-analysis was predominantly made up of small retrospective studies,
underlying the need for a randomized control trial evaluating the efficacy of local
antibiotics in acute open fracture management.
While causative organisms vary with location, cultures from open fractures are positive 83%
of the time. Cultures have shown high rates of colonization of both gram-positive organisms
(predominantly Staphylococcus aureus and epidermidis) as well as gram-negative organisms
(mostly Pseudomonaonas aeruginosa). Given this prevalence the antibiotics vancomycin and
tobramycin are likely good candidates given that they have high efficacy against the common
colonizing bacteria, are available in standardize powdered formula, reach high local
concentrations, and have a minimal cytotoxic effect to local cells6. Using a combination of
vancomycin and tobramycin in the acute care of severe open fractures may substantially
decrease risks of infection from both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens.