View clinical trials related to Infections.
Filter by:Objectives: 1. To compare the immune response of patients with or without sepsis presenting to the ED with a(n) (suspected) infection. 2. To determine immune response aberrations that are associated with an increased risk of developing sepsis in patients presenting to the ED with a(n) (suspected) infection without sepsis. 3. To determine the long term cognitive and physical sequelae of sepsis after admission.
Transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy (TULA) is increasingly favored in the treatment of appendicitis within the realm of minimally invasive surgical approaches. This procedure offers advantages such as superior cosmetic outcomes and reduced postoperative pain. However, like all surgical interventions, it carries the inherent risk of surgical site infections (SSI), which pose significant challenges to patient health and healthcare systems by escalating treatment costs, prolonging recovery, and increasing morbidity rates. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the "glove finger method" in mitigating SSI risk in TULA. The rationale for this study is predicated on the hypothesis that the glove finger method could serve as a simple and cost-effective measure offering potential protection against SSIs. When compared to traditional methods, this technique may not only reduce surgical duration but also diminish the risk of SSIs, thereby potentially decreasing hospital stay durations. Furthermore, enhancing the understanding of factors contributing to the development of SSIs and developing effective strategies for their prevention can elevate patient care quality and alleviate the burden on healthcare systems.
The primary objective of this clinical performance study is to evaluate and further validate the clinical performance of: 1. ClariLight Influenza A/B & SARS-CoV-2 test kits and 2. ClariLight Influenza A/B & RSV test kits, for the qualitative detection and differential diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) present in anterior nasal and oropharyngeal swab, in combination with an automated molecular diagnostic analyzer and sample collection tube by comparing them against a CE marked, in-vitro diagnostic device, used in the standard of care.
Pneumocystis jirovecii is a fungus that can colonize the airways of some patients and be responsible for a disease called pneumocystosis in other patients and mainly in immunocompromised patients. Pneumocystosis was mainly linked to HIV in the 1990s, but with the advent of new immunosuppressive molecules used in cancers or autoimmune diseases and with the increase in the number of transplants, the epidemiology has changed in recent years. Studies on P. jirovecii-related mortality are only based on patients with pneumocystosis. As a result, patients who are simply colonized or patients who are sick but not treated are not taken into account in these studies. The investigators therefore wish to study the overall mortality at six weeks and at three months in all patients with a positive sample for P. jirovecii
Comparing the diagnostic efficacy between traditional laboratory methods and second-generation high-throughput sequencing in patients suspected of spinal infections.
In this Dutch multicenter clinical trial, patients with a staphylococcal prosthetic joint infection, will, in the oral antibiotic treatment phase, be randomized between clindamycin monotherapy and rifampicin / levofloxacin combination therapy. The clinical endpoint will be treatment success one year after finishing antimicrobial treatment.
A randomized, Phase 2a, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity of multiple doses of orally administered EDP-323 in healthy subjects infected with RSV-A Memphis 37b. This study is designed to assess the antiviral effect of EDP-323 compared to a placebo control in the respiratory syncytial virus challenge model.
The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of addition of gentamicin on irrigation fluid during trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and its role in reduction of post-TURP infectious complications. the participants will be randomly divided into two groups: Group A (gentamicin group) and group B (Placebo).
Prebiotics as bovine colostrum are considered as a valuable supplement in the prevention of upper respiratory tract infections, gastrointestinal tract infections and neonatal sepsis. It contains many bioactive substances, such as immunoglobulins, lactoferrin, lysozyme, lactoperoxidase, and other growth factors.There is a lack of research on the use of prebiotics for prophylaxis against recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) in children.In this era of increasing bacterial resistance to antimicrobial therapy, bovine colostrum can offer an approach for prophylaxis against UTI in these patients.We aim at this trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bovine colostrum as a prebiotic for prophylaxis against recurrent urinary tract infection in children.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the clinical efficacy of individualized dosing based on the population pharmacokinetics (PK) model and empirical dosing of vancomycin in participants with severe infections. It aims to answer whether individual vancomycin dosing based on population PK model is superior to empirical dosing in terms of clinical efficacy and safety. Participants will be randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group will be guided by the population PK model for individual dosing, and the control group will be given empirical dosing. Demographic data, clinical characteristics of participants, and their trough concentrations (Cmin) and peak concentrations (Cmax) of vancomycin will be collected. Area under the concentration curve (AUC24) of participants will be calculated using the first-order PK equation. Researchers will compare experimental group and control group to see if individual vancomycin dosing based on population PK model is superior to empirical dosing in terms of clinical efficacy and safety.