View clinical trials related to Infant Conditions.
Filter by:An Emergency Care Action Plan (ECAP) is a tool intended to be helpful to providers when treating a child with complex medical needs during an emergency. Once created, ECAPs are added to the Electronic Health Record (EHR), shared with the child's caregiver(s), and kept up by all of those involved in a child's care. The goal of this study is to measure important health outcomes (ex. inpatient days, emergency department visits) in terms of the use of the ECAP for infants discharged from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). This study will also measure other real-time potential challenges related to the use of the ECAP including, but not limited to, if it is being used, if providers and caregivers want to use it, and if they keep using it over a long period of time.
This is a study to evaluate the prevalence of FGIDs in infants using the Thai version of Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire for functional gastrointestinal disorders in infants and evaluate the efficacy of Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 to prevent FGIDs in infants.
In 2014, the french hospital emphasized the need for tools to screen for social fragility in order to make explicit the choices of orientation of patients. To date, caregivers do not have any tools or clinical benchmarks for individual assessment of pediatric social and health vulnerability. The use of the Health Care Access Permanence Services (PASS) is intended to facilitate access to the health care system for people in precarious situations with care and social support within and outside the institutions. health. The hypothesis tested is that the use of a formalized tool makes it possible to improve the detection of pediatric social vulnerability and to overcome reluctance to practice by a simple, rapid and justified approach with regard to ongoing care. The primary objective is to validate a clinical tool for screening for pediatric social and health vulnerability - Tool: VUlnerable Child (ENVU) -; to allow for an appropriate orientation of the patient care pathway. The metrological validation of diagnostic performances (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios) will be studied in confrontation with the opinion of an expert caregiver in the care of vulnerable populations. This multicenter cross-sectional validation study of the screening tool will be conducted in two SAUPs with a pediatric PASS. 1000 children will be included in the centers for a period of 1 year. Following the introduction of the ENVU tool and after an expert interview, three groups of patients will be identified: Group A: no vulnerability according to expert with no indication of any PASS marker care Group B: probable vulnerability according to the expert with indication of at least one PASS marker care Group C: high vulnerability according to the expert with indication of at least two care markers PASS Group B and C patients will be reviewed at 6 months for a second visit to the ENVU tool. The main evaluation criterion will be the concordance between the indication of the use of the PASS by the "expert" PASS nurse (indicator of a significant social and health vulnerability) and the result of the ENVU tool.