Misoprostol Labour Induction Study

Induction of Labour Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Oral Misoprostol, Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol and Vaginal Dinoprostone for Induction of Labour

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03489928
• Other study ID #: REB#1415
• Secondary ID: 051.731.7303088
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: March 6, 2018
• Last updated: April 4, 2018
• Start date: April 1, 1999
• Est. completion date: December 1, 2000

Study information

• Verified date: April 2018
• Source: IWK Health Centre
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Labour induction is a frequent obstetric intervention (~20%). Prostaglandins (PGs) are effective agents, but gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance has limited use to non-oral routes. The traditional oxytocin "drip" requires intravenous (IV) use and discourages mobility. Misoprostol, a PG analogue, is marketed for oral treatment of GI disorders, but initiates uterine contraction, an undesirable GI side effect. Recently, there has been a research "boom" on vaginal misoprostol use in pregnancy to induce term labour drawing on this "side effect:". The principal investigator has led one of three groups worldwide which has published on oral misoprostol to study effectiveness, GI tolerance, and safety for mother/baby in term labour induction. Cost per patient has been less then one percent that of other PGs, even less than IV oxytocin.

Description:

Labour induction is a frequent obstetric intervention (20-30%). Prostaglandins (PGs) are effective agents, but gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance has limited use to intracervical and vaginal administration of PGE2 gels. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin E2 (PGE1) analogue, is marketed for oral treatment of upper GI disorders. The past five years has seen mushrooming literature on its use to initiate uterine contractions for pregnancy termination in the first and second trimesters, and labour induction in the third. Vaginal administration has been used almost exclusively, has been cost effective (less than one percent the cost of PGE2) and without demonstrated harm to mother or newborn. The investigators have published a randomized control trial (RCT) on vaginal use, and have also published a 275 subject RCT of oral misoprostol versus a traditional induction regime of (physician chosen combinations of intracervical or vaginal dinoprostone, intravenous (IV) oxytocin and artificial membrane rupture). Oral misoprostol was effective, well tolerated and without harm to mother or newborn. The investigators have in press a double blind RCT or oral versus vaginal misoprostol in 206 subjects. Oral misoprostol was effective, though time to vaginal birth was 226 min longer, due to more time before labour was initiated. Oral misoprostol was associated with less uterine hyperstimulation (P<0.04). The investigators have also completed an RCT of oral misoprostol versus IV oxytocin with term pre-labour membrane rupture. Again, effectiveness was shown. There is no larger published collective experience with oral misoprostol labour induction. Before embarking on a costly RCT to evaluate more substantive outcomes (Caesareans or neonatal asphyxia) with sample size greater than 10,000, funding has been received for this three-group RCT of labour induction at term: oral misoprostol, vaginal misoprostol, and our centre's established approach.

PRIMARY RESEARCH QUESTION When induction of labour at term is indicated, is there more than a four-hour difference in time to vaginal birth between vaginal misoprostol (25µg initial dose, followed by 25-50µg every six hours as needed), oral misoprostol (50µg every four hours as needed) and the Izaak Walton Killam (IWK) Health Centre established protocol? Secondary outcomes address harm to the newborn (including cord blood acid base analysis, and defined birth asphyxia criteria) and mother (Caesareans, peripartum interventions, maternal GI intolerance and excessive uterine activity).

RESEARCH PLAN Eligible subjects will be at gestations greater than 37 completed weeks, with a cephalic presenting live single fetus, who have an indication for induction, and no contraindication to induction, vaginal birth, or PG use. Random allocation will be blocked and stratified (on membrane status). Sample size calculations were based on: ∆=240 minutes, α(2 tailed) = 0.05, β=0.05, with a σ=588 minutes from the investigators' prior publications. Adjustments for anticipated Caesareans (<20%) were made. Sample size is 510. Recruitment within a year is supported by the group's prior research [more than 1000 inductions per year at IWK Grace ( the centre's name officially changed in November, 2000, to IWK Health Centre)].

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 511
• Est. completion date: December 1, 2000
• Est. primary completion date: December 1, 2000
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Female
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• pregnant women

• gestational age 37 weeks or more based on ultrasound before 24 weeks

• live single fetus in cephalic presentation

• indication for induction of labour

Exclusion Criteria:

• non reassuring fetal heart rate tracing

• maternal prior uterine surgery

• known hypersensitivity to misoprostol or other prostaglandin

• contraindication to vaginal birth

• fetal anomaly identified on antenatal ultrasound

• uncontrolled maternal asthma or epilepsy

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Induction of Labour
• Labour, Induced

Intervention

Drug:
• Oral Misoprostol
Prostaglandin E1 - 100ug tablet, divided in half by pharmacy staff to be administered by mouth.
• Vaginal Misoprostol
Prostaglandin E1 - 100ug oral tablet, divided in quarters by pharmacy staff, vaginal placement of one or two quarters as needed every 6 hours
• Dinoprostone
Prostaglandin E2 - 1-2mg gel manufactured for vaginal use; placed vaginally every 6 hours as needed.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
David Young

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Vaginal birth in less than 24 hours	Frequency of newborns with vaginal birth in less than 24 hours from randomization (induction).	Randomization to newborn birth, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
Other	Time interval from randomization to full dilation	ANOVA analysis for mothers with vaginal birth	Randomization to newborn birth, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
Other	First stage of labor duration	ANOVA analysis of time interval from labor onset to full dilation for mothers with vaginal birth	Randomization to newborn birth, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
Other	Second stage of labor duration	ANOVA analysis of time interval from full dilation to vaginal birth for mothers with vaginal birth	Randomization to newborn birth, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
Other	Maternal satisfaction questionaire	ANOVA analysis of participants' total score on the Labour Agentry Scale(LAS). The LAS will be given to consenting participants as a written questionnaire prior to maternal discharge. A mother will be asked to try to remember how she felt during her recent birth experience. If a response is not received by eight weeks following maternal discharge a single reminder telephone contact will made. The LAS is a seven point Likert scale. It measures a mother's sense of control during labor. Score range is from one to seven on each of 18 items. The minimum score is 18 and maximum score is 126. A higher score indicates a greater sense of control. (Hodnett ED, Simmons-Tropea DA. The Labour Agentry Scale: Psychometric properties of an instrument measuring control during childbirth. Res Nurs Health 1987;10:301-10)	Randomization to maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 10 weeks
Other	Maternal satisfaction choice	Frequency of response (yes/no) by participants to written question "If you needed a labor induction in another pregnancy would you want to have the same induction method ?" This question was administered with the questionnaire in Outcome 21 above, given to mother prior to hospital discharge.	Randomization to maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 10 weeks
Primary	Time interval from induction (at randomization) to vaginal birth	The chosen clinically important difference: 4 hours (240 minutes) difference. Caesarean sections could not be included in this planned parametric analysis (ANOVA) comparison of means	Randomization to newborn vaginal birth, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
Secondary	Time interval from induction (at randomization) to birth	Rank order nonparametric analysis [Kruskal Wallis (KW)] where a Caesarean is a failure to deliver vaginally and ranked longer than any vaginal birth- comparison of medians (KW ANOVA).	Randomization to newborn birth, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
Secondary	Profound newborn acidemia	Frequency of newborns with umbilical cord blood arterial pH < 7.0	Cord blood gas sample collected at birth
Secondary	Newborn respiratory depression	Frequency of newborns with Apgar score at 5 minutes < 4	Assessed at 5 minutes after birth
Secondary	Newborn birth asphyxia	Frequency of participants whose newborn experiences birth asphyxia as defined in the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Committee Opinion # 197 (Int J Gynecol Obstet 1998;61:309-10). The newborn with birth asphyxia must have each of the following four criteria :[1] profound academia (umbilical cord blood arterial pH< 7.0, obtained at birth); and (2) Apgar score <4 at five minutes as assessed by neonatal caregivers; and [3] neonatal neurologic sequelae (newborn with one or more of seizures, hypotonia, coma);and [4] dysfunction in one or more of the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hematologic, pulmonary, hepatic or renal systems. Criteria (3) and (4) are as assessed by neonatal caregivers from birth to newborn hospital discharge.	Birth to newborn hospital discharge, assessed up to 10 weeks
Secondary	Newborn severe metabolic acidemia	Frequency of newborns with umbilical cord arterial blood base deficit >16.0 mmol/L	Cord blood gas sample collected at birth
Secondary	Newborn moderate metabolic acidemia	Frequency of newborns with umbilical cord arterial blood base deficit >12.0 mmol/L	Cord blood gas sample collected at birth
Secondary	Birth method	Frequency of spontaneous, operative vaginal (vacuum and/or forceps), or caesarean birth	At newborn birth
Secondary	Oxytocin Use	Frequency of participants who received intrapartum use of oxytocin for labor augmentation or induction	Randomization to maternal delivery, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
Secondary	Epidural Use	Frequency of participants who received an epidural for intrapartum analgesia	Randomization to maternal delivery, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
Secondary	Perineal Trauma	Frequency of participants who had received suture perineal repair of a laceration or episiotomy	Randomization to maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 10 weeks
Secondary	Caesarean Section	Frequency of Caesarean section	At newborn birth
Secondary	Maternal nausea	Frequency of participants who had nausea during labor	Randomization to maternal delivery, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
Secondary	Maternal vomiting	Frequency of participants who had vomiting during labor	Randomization to maternal delivery, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
Secondary	Maternal diarrhea	Frequency of participants experiencing diarrhea during labor	Randomization to maternal delivery, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
Secondary	Excessive uterine activity	Frequency of tachysystole and/or hyperstimulation - blind review of fetal heart rate, uterine contraction tracings by research team physician, remote from delivery.	Randomization to birth, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks