Induction of Labor Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Use of Castor Oil for Induction of Labour in Women With Previous Caesarean Delivery: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT number | NCT03958981 |
Other study ID # | castor oil |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | July 15, 2019 |
Est. completion date | July 15, 2020 |
Verified date | November 2021 |
Source | Cairo University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Nowadays, more and more women embark on pregnancy with previous Caesarean scar. One in five pregnancies requires induction of labour. The use of non-pharmacological methods (methods without using medication) has been gaining popularity for women who are not good candidates, such as women with previous Caesarean scar, for induction with medications such as prostaglandin. Labour induction with prostaglandin carries a higher risk of uterine rupture and thus it is not routinely offered to women with previous Caesarean delivery in Cairo University Hospital. Non-pharmacological methods of induction of labour appear to be safe in women with previous Caesarean delivery. However, various methods are available and the efficacy among them remain in doubt.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 70 |
Est. completion date | July 15, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | May 30, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 20 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Pregnant women with one previous lower segment Caesarean section who are admitted to Cairo University Hospital for induction of labor (IOL) will be recruited. The inclusion criteria are age at least 20 years old, gestational age at recruitment from 36 weeks to 38 weeks ±6 days, gestational age at induction= 39 weeks, singleton pregnancy, reassuring fetal status, and Bishop score = 6. Exclusion Criteria: - Prior high-risk uterine scar; uterine rupture, classical CS, hysterotomy, or myomectomy - Short inter-delivery interval (<12 months) - Complications in the previous CS (e.g. puerperal sepsis) Obstetric indication for CS (either elective or emergency): - Placenta praevia - Placental abruption - Documented evidence of cephalopelvic disproportion - Fetal macrosomia (estimated fetal weight >4 kg) - Fetal anomalies interfering with vaginal delivery e.g. hydrocephalus - Fetal distress or non-reassuring Cardiotocography pattern |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | faculty of medicine Cairo university | Cairo |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Cairo University | Dina latif, Mohamed El Sharkawy, mohamed hisham gouda, Yomna Bayoumi |
Egypt,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage of women entering active phase within 24 hours of administering castor oil/placebo | Actual time of delivery | two weeks | |
Primary | number of successful VBAC cases | number of successful cases who delivered vaginally | 24 hours | |
Secondary | Neonatal apgar scores | Neonatal APGAR scores | 1 minute and 5 minute after delivery | |
Secondary | Neonatal complications including hospitalization in NICU | Were there any admissions to NICU, what was the reason ? | immediately after birth | |
Secondary | Mode of delivery (ie. Normal delivery Vs. Cesarean delivery) | Mode of delivery | Within two weeks of enrollment | |
Secondary | duration of labor | duration of labor in hours | 24 hours | |
Secondary | number of cases needing oxytocin augmentation | number of cases needing oxytocin augmentation | 24 hours |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01127581 -
Efficacy & Safety Study Comparing Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) for Reducing Time to Vaginal Delivery
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01139801 -
Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labor: Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in Conjunction With Foley Balloon
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06324279 -
Cervical Sliding Sign to Predict Outcome of Induction of Labor
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05864326 -
Heated Saline in Cervical Balloon for Labor Induction, a RCT
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06056141 -
Induction of Labour at Term With Low Dose Oral Misoprostol Versus a Foley Catheter
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04529837 -
Ultrasound Assessment of DILAPAN-S
|
||
Completed |
NCT02477085 -
Methods of Labor Induction and Perinatal Outcomes
|
||
Completed |
NCT02098421 -
Foley Labor Induction Trial at Term and in PROM
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03138252 -
Study of the Effectiveness of Cervical Ripening Balloon With and Without Oxytocin
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01720394 -
Efficacy of Induction of Labor on Term Using a Double Balloon Catheter Compared to Dinoprostone Vaginal-insert
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00451308 -
Induction of Labor With a Foley Balloon Catheter: Inflation With 30ml Compared to 60ml
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05511727 -
Use of Single Versus Double Foley's Catheter in Pre-induction Cervical Ripening
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02762942 -
Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol Plus Supracervical Balloon Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01283022 -
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of the 200 Microgram (mcg) Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI 200) in Women at Term Gestation (The MVI-PK Study)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00684606 -
Transcervical Foley Catheter With or Without Oxytocin for Induction of Labor
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05759364 -
The Effect of IV PAPAVERINE 80 mg Prior to Catheter Balloon Insertion on Bishop Score and Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03854383 -
Using Isosorbide Mononitrate in Reducing Time in Induction of Labor in Post Date Women
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01428037 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03752073 -
Comparison of Two Mechanical Methods of Outpatient Ripening of the Cervix
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03045939 -
Cervical Ripening With the Double Balloon Device for 6 Hours Compared With 12 Hours
|
N/A |