Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Although predicted REE calculated using the Penn state 1988 method agreed (ICC 0.61, p=0.00014) with the measured REE, all three predictive equations had a fixed bias and appeared to be inaccurate for predicting REE for liver transplant recipients.

Therefore, precise measurements using indirect calorimetry may be helpful when treating critically ill patients to avoid underestimating or overestimating their metabolic needs.


Clinical Trial Description

Rationale: The aim of this study was to compare predictive equations with indirect calorimetry and identify the appropriate energy expenditure requirement of liver transplant(LT) recipients in South Korea.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in a surgical ICU in an academic tertiary hospital over three months. Thirty mechanically ventilated patients who had received liver transplants and were expected to stay in the ICU more than 2 days were studied. Resting energy expenditure(REE) was measured 48 hours after ICU admission using open-circuit indirect calorimetry. Theoretical REE was estimated using three predictive equations: Harris-Benedict methods, lreton-Jones ventilated, and Penn state 1988. The REEs derived from each predictive equation were compared with the measured REE using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and a Bland-Altman plot. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03622268
Study type Observational
Source Asan Medical Center
Contact
Status Completed
Phase
Start date December 1, 2017
Completion date August 1, 2018

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Withdrawn NCT04132700 - Longitudinal Evaluation of Energy Expenditure in ICU Patients From Admission to Discharge Using A Novel Indirect Calorimeter: LEEP-Forward Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05008757 - Comparison of Indirect Calorimetry by Q-NRG With Deltatrac II
Recruiting NCT04500483 - Indirect Calorimetry in Patients at Risk of Malnutrition