Filter results

Incontinence Stress clinical trials

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

View clinical trials related to Incontinence Stress.

Filter by:

Completed
Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05735223 Completed - Clinical trials for Prostate Adenocarcinoma

A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Impact of Maximal Urethral Length Preservation Technique During Robotic Laparoscopic Prostatectomy on the Stretched Flaccid Penile Length and Continence

Start date: September 30, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

After robotic prostatectomy, besides erectile function and achievement of oncological control, staying dry is also a very important desire expressed frequently by the patients. This has led to the concept of trifecta achievement after robotic prostatectomies. Hence, continence preserving prostatectomies are the order of the day today. Patient acceptance to surgery is low if the continence cannot be assured preoperatively. Many techniques have been promulgated in the last two decades. The investigators present a novel technique of maximal urethral length preservation during surgery as an effective method of continence preservation. The investigators hypothesize that maximal preservation of urethra would lead to improved and early continence after robotic prostatectomy. The investigators also hypothesize that urethral preservation spares penile length shortening. The investigators therefore propose to prospectively evaluate penile length shortening. While penile length change after radical prostatectomy has been studied in the past, the investigators like to assess the penile morphometric assessment following the novel technique of maximal urethral length preservation radical prostatectomy.