View clinical trials related to Incisional Hernia.
Filter by:Design of a simple blind randomized controlled trial study. Large incisional hernia repair with use of local hemostatic Hemoblock
Long-term extension of a previous trial comparing outcomes after open (OVHR) or laparoscopic incisional ventral hernia repair (LVHR), assessing recurrence, reoperation, intraperitoneal mesh-related complications and self-reported quality-of-life with 10-15 years of follow-up.
22 patients of incisional hernia underwent treatment by double mesh modification of the original Chevrel's technique the primary outcome was recurrence, skin necrosis secondery out come was pain hematoma seroma
comparison between onlay and preperitoneal augmentation of mid line closure in high risk patients
An incisional hernia is technically challenging to operate and is the most frequent long-term complication after open surgery, resulting in impaired quality of life and reduced physical ability. Large hernias contain large amounts of abdominal volume, which similarly are missing from the abdominal cavity. Due to adaptations of the abdominal wall muscles and decreased space in the abdominal cavity, abdominal wall reconstruction lead to increased tension and thereby increased intraabdominal pressure. Reduced renal and lung function after surgery is one of the leading causes of prolonged hospitalization, increased costs and mortality. Elevated intraabdominal pressure is a known risk factor for kidney injury, but relationships between hernia surgery, increased intraabdominal pressure, renal and lung function are still unclear. Therefore, in patients undergoing surgery for incisional hernia, we will investigate the extent and consequences of elevated intraabdominal pressure, as well as its relation to renal injury and reduced lung function. We will also investigate the relationship between hernia dimensions and the development of increased intraabdominal pressure, as well as identifying patients at particular risk of developing elevated intraabdominal pressure. From April 2020 to October 2021, we will include 100 patients at Bispebjerg Hospital, Denmark, diagnosed with medium to giant incisional hernia, who will undergo scheduled surgery. Patients are followed from before to 30 days after surgery. They will be examined with CT scans before and after surgery. Blood tests, pulmonary function tests and measurement intraabdominal pressure will be performed before and until 3 days after surgery. Thirty days after surgery, lung function tests and blood tests are repeated at a final examination at the out-patient clinic. During follow-up, differences in hospital stay, complications, reoperations, and mortality will be investigated. Participation in the project is not associated with any side effects and risks. The study is expected great scientific gain, as the results can help identify particularly vulnerable patients in need of extended observation and treatment. The results obtained by the project are sought to be published in relevant scientific journals and conferences. The project is expected to extend over a 3-year period, which will include commissioning, data collection, analytical processing, dissemination of results and conduction of PhD thesis.
Introduction: By definition, the laparotomy is a surgical incision into the abdomen cavity performed to examine the abdominal and retroperitoneal organs. The evisceration/eventration and the hernia are considered the most frequent complication of the midline laparotomy with a high morbidity and mortality related. Conditions that will require a second intervention, in Mexico represent the seventh cause of elective surgery and fourth cause of emergency procedures. The objective of this study is to determine if the incidence of post-incisional hernia in patients with high risk after a midline laparotomy are similar between the closure of the abdominal wall with the RTL technique and the supraaponeurotic mesh closure reinforcement. Material and Methods: Clinical trial comparing the use of mesh against the RTL technique for post-incisional hernia prophylaxis. Two groups, triple blind Analysis will be carried out with intent to treat and not inferiority with 95% confidence intervals
Incisional hernias after laparotomy are associated with significant morbidity and increased costs. Research is focused on development of new techniques to prevent incisional hernia. Little is known about application of this evidence in daily practice. Therefore, a survey was performed among Dutch surgeons.
This is a multisite randomized control proof-of-concept trial to evaluate the safety of Duramesh laparotomy closure in the trauma and emergency laparotomy setting. The study will be performed at University of Maryland Shock Trauma Center and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. One hundred (100) patients will be randomized (2:1) to Duramesh laparotomy closure versus conventional suture closure. After the patient has been confirmed to be a candidate for the trial, randomization will be performed in the operating room upon completion of the index abdominal procedure. Duramesh will be provided for patients assigned to the Duramesh treatment arm. Patients will be followed for 1 year following laparotomy closure at follow-up intervals of 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
STUDY SUMMARY Incisional hernias, or swellings of the abdominal scar after surgery, remain problematic especially after transplant surgery. This is because they can cause complications, including trapping of bowel or the transplant. This can cause life threatening emergencies but is at the very least unsightly and uncomfortable for the patient. Transplant patients are especially likely to develop hernias because of the diseases causing the renal failure and the drugs that they take to dampen the immune system. There is evidence from other surgery that the stitching methods that are used to close the wounds might decrease the risk of surgical hernias. This is achieved by placing smaller and more numerous sutures (stitches) in the wound to increase the strength of the repair. However, this has never been tested formally in transplant where it may provide significant benefit. We intend to do some initial investigation of whether using the smaller stitches may provide benefit over more traditional methods that are currently being used. We will look at early complications after surgery but also the rate of hernia formation later. We hope to improve outcomes and reduce complications for our transplant patients by doing this. In addition we will collect blood and tissue samples from both live kidney donors and the recipients to microscopically analyse their collagen to identify potential factors which may indicate risk of hernia formation.
Evaluate the effectiveness of mesh reinforcement in high-risk patients to prevent incisional hernia.