Implant Complication Clinical Trial
— ABLESOfficial title:
Prospective Multicenter Study of the Improvement of Symptoms After Removal of the Essure® Contraceptive Implant
ESSURE® is an implantable medical device for definitive and irreversible sterilization indicated for adult women of childbearing age. These implants are inserted into the fallopian tubes by hysteroscopy. Marketed in 2002, ESSURE® contraceptive implants were withdrawn from the French market in 2017 (and worldwide in 2017 and 2018) following the observation in certain patients of polymorphic and non-specific gynecological and extra-gynecological symptoms. Studies with small numbers and short-term follow-up have shown a significant improvement in these symptoms after implant explantation. This constitutes a real public health problem since according to the report of the EPI-PHARE Scientific Interest Group, 198,000 French women have these implants and only 30,000 of them, or 15%, have been explanted, knowing that explantation of ESSURE® implants is recommended only in symptomatic patients. A large number of these patients, presenting symptoms, have not yet been treated for an explant. The physiopathological mechanism(s) is (are) not yet determined but several arguments are in favor of a dissemination of metallic elements contained in these implants whose accumulation could lead to inflammatory and/or allergic and/or autoimmune phenomena. Carrying out a prospective study with long-term longitudinal follow-up appears essential to precisely assess the degree of improvement in the symptoms and quality of life of these patients, determine the most appropriate surgical techniques, and understand the pathophysiological mechanisms that may result in the implementation of specific treatments and relevant markers. From a surgical point of view, there is a real risk of fracture of implants whatever the type of intervention performed: study the biomechanical properties of implants with a view to characterizing their behavior to mechanical rupture but also their thermal resistance in an objective manner seems essential to limit the risk of fracture and help to inform the patient about the surgical technique proposed for explantation. From a biological point of view, the dosage of the metallic elements constituting ESSURE® implants and potentially toxic ones could make it possible to objectify the release of these metallic elements in the body. Analysis of pro-inflammatory cytokines, micro-RNAs (miRNA), quantitative analysis of inflammatory pathway messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNAs) (NanoString technology) and analysis of neuroinflammation by functional imaging should make it possible to explore potential pathophysiological mechanisms. This study responds to a significant request from patient associations.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 444 |
Est. completion date | June 1, 2036 |
Est. primary completion date | August 1, 2031 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 35 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility | - Inclusion Criteria * : ESSURE Group: - woman aged 35 to 75 - patient with at least one Essure® implant - surgical intervention planned because the patient is symptomatic: removal of the Essure® implant(s) - planned intervention via vaginal route, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, or Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (VNotes) - patient having given free, informed and signed consent Selection for MRI-PET examination: - if the answer is "poor" or "bad" to the first question of the SF-12 pre-operatively - no hysterectomy - no analgesic treatment, or treatment stopped 48 hours before the examination - no psychotropic treatment (anxiolytics, hypnotics (sleeping pills), antidepressants, mood stabilizers, neuroleptics) - patient having given free, informed and signed consent Control group: - woman aged 35 to 75 - planned surgical intervention: salpingectomy with or without hysterectomy for benign indication - planned intervention via vaginal route, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, or VNotes - patient having given free, informed and signed consent Selection for MRI-PET examination: - age matching (+/- 5 years) with Essure® patients who have had an MRI-PET - matching on surgical technique with Essure® patients who have had an MRI-PET: salpingectomy with or without hysterectomy - no analgesic treatment, or treatment stopped 48 hours before the examination - no psychotropic treatment (anxiolytics, hypnotics (sleeping pills), antidepressants, mood stabilizers, neuroleptics) - patient having given free, informed and signed consent - Exclusion Criteria * : ESSURE Group: - asymptomatic patient - planned intervention by laparotomy - patient potentially exposed to other heavy metals: wearer of metallic orthopedic equipment (hip or knee prosthesis, etc.), wearer of coronary stent, or tubal ligation clip - inability to understand the information given - persons deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision - people undergoing psychiatric care - people admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than research - adults subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship) - people not affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiaries of a similar scheme - person participating in another interventional research that may interfere with the research Selection for MRI-PET examination: - claustrophobia - dosimetry of all radiological examinations over the past year not acceptable Control Group : - current pregnancy - patient with cancer - patient who has already had an Essure® implant removed - patient potentially exposed to heavy metals: wearer of metallic orthopedic equipment (hip or knee prosthesis, etc.), wearer of coronary stent, or tubal ligation clip - planned intervention by laparotomy - inability to understand the information given - persons deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision - people undergoing psychiatric care - people admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than research - adults subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship) - people not affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiaries of a similar scheme - person participating in another interventional research that may interfere with the research Selection for MRI-PET examination: - claustrophobia - dosimetry of all radiological examinations over the past year not acceptable |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | CHU de Angers | Angers | |
France | Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant (Hospices Civils de Lyon) | Bron | |
France | Hôpital Bicêtre | Le Kremlin-Bicêtre | |
France | Hôpital Jeanne de Flandres | Lille | |
France | Hôpital de La Conception | Marseille | |
France | Institut Mère Enfant Alix de Champagne, CHU Reims | Reims | |
France | CHU de Rouen | Rouen | |
France | Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg | Strasbourg | |
France | Hôpital Paule de Viguier, CHU de Toulouse | Toulouse | |
France | Hôpital André Mignot, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles | Versailles |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Hospices Civils de Lyon |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage of patients with improvement in symptoms Percentage of patients with improvement in symptoms | Percentage of patients with a score of 1, 2 or 3 (corresponding to improvement in symptoms) on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale.
The PGI-I is a transition scale that is a single question asking the patient to rate their symptoms now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1 = Very much better to 7 = Very much worse. |
At 2 months after surgical intervention (removal of the Essure® contraceptive implant) | |
Secondary | Percentage of patients with improvement in symptoms | Percentage of patients with a score of 1, 2 or 3 (corresponding to improvement in symptoms) on the PGI-I scale.
The PGI-I is a transition scale that is a single question asking the patient to rate their symptoms now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1 = Very much better to 7 = Very much worse. |
up 5 years | |
Secondary | Short Form 12 (SF-12) score | quality of life with assessment of the physical dimension (from 9.94738 to 70.02246) and the mental dimension (from 5.89058 to 71.96825). For each, the average in the general population is 50. | up 5 years | |
Secondary | Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) score | quality of life of women with fibromyalgia symptoms (from 0 : no symptoms to 100 : important symptoms) | up 5 years | |
Secondary | Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) score | anxiety dimension and depressive dimension (for each dimension, from 0 : no symptom to 21 : certain symptomatology) | up 5 years | |
Secondary | Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)-20 score | Fatigue assessment according to 5 dimensions (General Fatigue, Physical and Mental Fatigue, Reduction in Motivation and Activities) (score from 20 : no fatigue to 100 : important fatigue) | up 5 years | |
Secondary | Visual analog scale (VAS) score | pain assessment (from 0 : no pain to 100 : unbearable pain) | up 5 years | |
Secondary | Questionnaire Douleur St-Antoine (QDSA) score | Assessment of sensory impact of pain (from 0: no pain to 36: important impact) and emotional impact of pain (from 0: no pain to 28 : important impact). The global score ranges from 0 to 64. | up 5 years | |
Secondary | Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) score | quality of sexual life (from 2 to 36). A low score indicates poorer sexual function. | up 5 years | |
Secondary | Higham questionnaires | The Higham score is used to quantify blood loss during menstruation. A score = 100 indicates a loss of 80 ml or more, which defines menorrhagia. A score = 150 may indicate an indication for surgery for menometrorrhagia. | up 5 years | |
Secondary | visual analog scale (VAS) score | Assessment by the surgeon of the difficulty of performing the ablation on a visual analog scale : from 0 (very easy) to 100 mm (very difficult) | During surgical intervention | |
Secondary | Duration of the procedure | Duration of the procedure (calculated between incision and closure) in number of minutes | During surgical intervention | |
Secondary | Complications | Number and types of per- and post-operative complications | Up to 2 months after the operation | |
Secondary | characterization of the mechanical behavior of the implant | characterization of the mechanical behavior of the Essure® device implant will be assessed during tensile breakage and thermal breakage for its two parts (internal part and external part) | During surgical intervention | |
Secondary | determination of the associated mechanical stress levels determination of the associated mechanical stress levels | determination of the associated mechanical stress levels of the Essure® device implant will be assessed during tensile breakage and thermal breakage for its two parts (internal part and external part) | During surgical intervention | |
Secondary | quantification of the factors influencing these levels of mechanical stress | quantification of the factors influencing these levels of mechanical stress of the Essure® device implant will be assessed during tensile breakage and thermal breakage for its two parts (internal part and external part) | During surgical intervention | |
Secondary | thermal resistance | The thermal resistance of the Essure® device implant during coagulations/electrical sections will be assessed. | During surgical intervention | |
Secondary | risk of degradation | The risk of degradation depending on the temperature f the Essure® device implant used during coagulations/electrical sections will be assessed. | During surgical intervention | |
Secondary | Concentrations of titanium constituting the Essure® implant | Concentrations of titanium constituting the Essure® implant in the peritoneal fluid, in the surgical piece, in the urine, in the blood, in the appendages (hair). | up 12 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | Concentrations of nickel constituting the Essure® implant | Concentrations of nickel constituting the Essure® implant in the peritoneal fluid, in the surgical piece, in the urine, in the blood, in the appendages (hair). | up 12 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | Concentrations of chromium constituting the Essure® implant | Concentrations of chromium constituting the Essure® implant in the peritoneal fluid, in the surgical piece, in the urine, in the blood, in the appendages (hair). | up 12 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | Concentrations of tin constituting the Essure® implant | Concentrations of tin constituting the Essure® implant in the peritoneal fluid, in the surgical piece, in the urine, in the blood, in the appendages (hair). | up 12 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | Concentrations of platinum constituting the Essure® implant | Concentrations of platinum constituting the Essure® implant in the peritoneal fluid, in the surgical piece, in the urine, in the blood, in the appendages (hair). | up 12 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | Concentrations of iridium constituting the Essure® implant | Concentrations of iridium constituting the Essure® implant in the peritoneal fluid, in the surgical piece, in the urine, in the blood, in the appendages (hair). | up 12 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | Concentrations of molybdenum constituting the Essure® implant | Concentrations of molybdenum constituting the Essure® implant in the peritoneal fluid, in the surgical piece, in the urine, in the blood, in the appendages (hair). | up 12 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | Concentrations of manganese constituting the Essure® implant | Concentrations of manganese constituting the Essure® implant in the peritoneal fluid, in the surgical piece, in the urine, in the blood, in the appendages (hair). | up 12 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | Concentrations of tungsten constituting the Essure® implant | Concentrations of tungsten constituting the Essure® implant in the peritoneal fluid, in the surgical piece, in the urine, in the blood, in the appendages (hair). | up 12 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | Concentrations of silver constituting the Essure® implant | Concentrations of silver constituting the Essure® implant in the peritoneal fluid, in the surgical piece, in the urine, in the blood, in the appendages (hair). | up 12 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | Concentrations of iron constituting the Essure® implant | Concentrations of iron constituting the Essure® implant in the peritoneal fluid, in the surgical piece, in the urine, in the blood, in the appendages (hair). | up 12 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | concentration of pro-inflammatory cytokines | concentration of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the blood will be assessed | Up 2 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | expression profile of miRNAs | Expression profile of miRNAs in the peritoneal fluid will be assessed. | Up 2 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | activated T lymphocyte profile | activated T lymphocyte profile in blood will be assessed. | Up 2 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | analysis of inflammatory pathway mRNAs | analysis of inflammatory pathway mRNAs (nanostring® technology) in a pathology sample from the surgical specimen will be assessed. | Up 2 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | Percentage of detection of Human Leukocyte Antigen | Percentage of detection of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-DR53 (DRB4*01) associated with nickel allergies in blood will be assessed. | Up 2 months after surgical intervention | |
Secondary | Functional brain functions | MRI-PET (Magnetic resonance imaging- Positron Emission Tomography) examination :
Mapping of brain inflammation: binding potential mapping of [11C]PK11195 characteristic of activated microglia Brain anatomical imaging: clinical type anatomical MRI examination to assess the presence of cerebral anatomical abnormality Brain mapping of functional connectivity at rest using Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) Brain mapping of structural connectivity by diffusion MRI Perfusion imaging : perfusion MRI examination without contrast product to assess the presence of cerebral perfusion abnormality Magnetic susceptibility imaging: to detect possible hemorrhages |
up 6 months after Surgical intervention |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03663439 -
Modified Shell Technique Versus Onlay Bone Graft in Anterior Maxilla
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06263842 -
Elamrousy Novel Approach of Socket Shield Technique
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03041597 -
Dental Implant Supported Removable Dental Prostheses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03383120 -
Diode Laser for Treatment of Peri-implantitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05999760 -
Retention, Chewing Efficiency and Masticatory Performance of Partial Dentures Opposing Implant Retained Prosthesis.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06363903 -
ASIA-Mesh: a Pilot Study for Diagnostics and Treatment on ASIA Syndrome Caused by Polypropylene Mesh Implantation
|
||
Completed |
NCT04017026 -
Survival and Success Rates of 6mm Implants With a Micro-rough Surface After 4.5 - 18.2 Years in Function
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05729607 -
Vertical Soft Tissue Augmentation With CTG vs ADM
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04941612 -
Use of the Bioabsorbable Activa IM-Nail™ in Pediatric Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06307691 -
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Osseodensification Versus Traditional Drilling Protocol
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06299449 -
Artificial Intelligence Assisted Socket Shield With Computer Guided Implant Placement
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05297253 -
Prosthetic and Biological Complications of Implant Supported Prostheses
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06313216 -
Treatment of Peri-implant Bone Dehiscence Using Autogenous Tooth Plate
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06254378 -
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Allograft Versus Tenting Technique in Open Sinus Lifting With Immediate Implant Placement
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05766878 -
The Rehabilitation of Atrophic Jaws Using Short Implants With Different Surface Characteristics
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05960500 -
All on Six Versus Parallel Implant Distribution for Maxillary Denture Opposing Mandibular All on Four
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04622852 -
Pegs for Osteofixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03524885 -
Standard Implants With Bone Regeneration vs Short Implants
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05361980 -
Pediatric Orthopaedic Implant Safety & Efficacy
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05576922 -
Collagen Matrix + rhPDGF-BB vs Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Dehiscences
|
N/A |