Implant Placement Using a Newly Designed Single Drill Versus Conventional Sequential Drills

Implant Complication Clinical Trial

Official title:

Single Drill Vrs Sequential Drill Dental Implants Placement

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04877145
• Other study ID #: 17300587
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: February 12, 2017
• Est. completion date: April 20, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: May 2021
• Source: Assiut University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

dental implants are usually placed by sequential set of drills which could increase the time of the surgery and could raise the temperature of the osteotomy preparation so a new drill was designed to place the implants fast and easy way

Description:

Dental implant success is evident nowadays with the predictable functional and aesthetic results obtained . Simplified techniques and approaches are preferred for the convenience of both the patients and operators . Current research is focusing on decreasing the number of instruments used, shortening of the operation time and performing flapless approaches for implant placement whenever possible. This is done to reduce the postoperative complaints, such as pain, swelling and bleeding; thus decreasing the need for analgesics and minimising the occurrence of morbidity .

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 61
• Est. completion date: April 20, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: February 8, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 60 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• The inclusion criteria :

• implant recipient sites free from any pathological conditions.

• Patients who were cooperative, motivated and hygiene conscious were selected.

• non smoker patients

• exclusion criteria :

• Patients unable to undergo minor oral surgical procedures

• patients with a history of drug abuse or catabolic drugs were not included.

• Patients with a history of psychiatric disorder and those with unrealistic expectations about the aesthetic outcome of implant therapy were also excluded.

• Patients with insufficient vertical inter-arch space, on centric occlusion, to accommodate the available restorative components .

• Uncontrolled diabetic patients

• Patient who had any systemic condition that may contraindicate implant therapy (impaired wound healing - bleeding disorders

• patients who had any habits that might jeopardise the osseointegration process, such as heavy smoking and alcoholism.

• Patients with para-functional habits that produce overload on the implant, such as bruxism and clenching were excluded.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Implant Complication

Intervention

Other:
• drill
single 3.25 mm stainless steel drill

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	Assiut University	Assuit

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Assiut University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

References & Publications (4)

Abboud M, Delgado-Ruiz RA, Kucine A, Rugova S, Balanta J, Calvo-Guirado JL. Multistepped Drill Design for Single-Stage Implant Site Preparation: Experimental Study in Type 2 Bone. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e472-85. doi: 10.1111/cid.12273. Epub 2014 Sep 29. — View Citation

Bacci C, Lucchiari N, Frigo AC, Stecco C, Zanette G, Dotto V, Sivolella S. Temperatures generated during implant site preparation with conventional drilling versus single-drill method: an ex-vivo human mandible study. Minerva Stomatol. 2019 Dec;68(6):277-284. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04142-6. — View Citation

La Du BN. The human serum paraoxonase/arylesterase polymorphism. Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Sep;43(3):227-9. Review. — View Citation

Lucchiari N, Frigo AC, Stellini E, Coppe M, Berengo M, Bacci C. In Vitro Assessment with the Infrared Thermometer of Temperature Differences Generated During Implant Site Preparation: The Traditional Technique Versus the Single-Drill Technique. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Feb;18(1):182-91. doi: 10.1111/cid.12246. Epub 2014 Jul 17. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	osseointegration of the dental implants	healing and union of the dental implants with the surrounding bone measured by torque wrench exceeds 30 N/CM	6 months
Secondary	mobility	the fixation of the implants checked by perio test M (-8- 0) INDICATES nonmobile	6 months
Secondary	bone loss	by periapical xray the bone loss measured from the platform of the implant if present unit of measurement : mm	6 months , 1 ,2 and 3 years after function