View clinical trials related to Immediate Implant.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) technique using alloderm versus connective tissue graft both with xenogenic bone membrane in immediate implants of anterior aesthetic zone.
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effect of different anatomical variations in terms of root angulation, alveolar bone and basal bone morphology on soft and hard tissue alterations in patients with non-restorable teeth in the inter-canine region undergoing immediate implantation. The main question it aims to answer are: - Will the amount of collapse be greater when the root is proclined or outside the bone housing? - Will no additional intervention be needed with immediate implants in the esthetic zone if we have better anatomy that will help hinder the collapse? Participants will receive immediate dental implants with customized healing abutments
: Evaluation of Soft and Hard Tissue Changes following Immediate Implant using Immediate Dentoalveolar Restoration Versus Ice Cream Cone technique for management of Cases With Labial Plate Dehiscence
Evaluation of Soft and Hard Tissue Changes After Immediate Implant Placement With Sticky Tooth Versus Autogenous Tooth Graft for management of Cases With Labial Plate Dehiscence
36 patients, were included in this study. They were chosen from the Outpatient Clinic in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University for replacement of non-restorable maxillary anterior and premolar teeth (esthetic zone) by immediate implant.
To compare the use of demineralized autogenous tooth graft versus autogenous bone graft, in the jumping gap in immediate implant placement with immediate loading.
Ridge split augmentation technique, with immediate implant placement, reduces the time of the treatment and the time of the final prosthetic reconstruction. Furthermore, compression of the bone increases its density. SMV is also found to promote osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stem cells, suppress osteoclastic differentiation in bone tissue, and promotes osseointegration around implants in animal studies. The aim of this study is to compare surgical outcomes of the application of the alveolar ridge splitting (ARS) in combination with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using bone grafting and a barrier membrane, associated with immediate implant placement versus ARS in combination with the use of SMV with GBR using bone grafting and a barrier membrane, associated with immediate implant placement in patients with horizontally atrophic jaw bones.
The utilization of SLActive implants which allow more rapid osseointgeration with 3 to 4 weeks. will be placed in thin buccal bone as immediate implants to determine the resorption compared to thick buccal bone
Adequate bone volume and a proper aesthetic outcome have become the main focus of interest in implant dentistry. Alveolar bone resorption is a natural course occurring after tooth removal. Partial extraction therapy through root preservation has been reported to help in bone maintenance at the extraction site. In 2010, Hurzeler et al. evaluated a new approach, at that time, called socket shield technique. Han et al. in 2018 reported the modification of this technique and leaving the jump gap between the shield and the implant non-grafted. The importance of bone grafting of the gap between the implant and the labial shield in improving quality of regenerating bone and prevention of the soft tissue ingrowth has been described. Thus the hypothesis, of improving the modified socket shield technique by bone grafting could be tested. Aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of using xenogenic bone graft on outcome of immediate dental implant placement using the modified socket shield technique.