Immediate Dental Implants Clinical Trial
Official title:
Implant Failure When Using Angled Versus Straight Abutments in Immediately Placed and Restored Implants in the Esthetic Zone Using Computer Aided Surgical Guides:A Randomized Clinical Trial
Verified date | June 2020 |
Source | Cairo University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
patients with fractured teeth in the esthetic area requiring immediate restoration will be recruited to the study. Immediate implants will be placed and patients will be restored either with straight or angled abutments. Implant failure will be measured.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 90 |
Est. completion date | December 30, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | December 1, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 20 Years to 50 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with teeth or remaining roots indicated for extraction in the esthetic zone and eligible for immediate implant placement Sufficient bone labially (at least 1.5-2 mm) assessed after cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) scan Presence of adequate mesio distal length between the adjacent natural teeth (at least 7 mm), measured on the study cast Presence of adjacent natural teeth to the tooth/teeth to be extracted Exclusion Criteria: - Presence of active signs or symptoms of acute infection in the tooth or the remaining root Heavy smokers (more than 2 packs per day) Parafunctional habits (clenching or bruxism) diagnosed by history taking and observation of the occlusal surface of the posterior teeth for wear facets Patients with poor oral hygiene Pregnant women Any systemic condition that may interfere with osseointegration (as uncontrolled diabetes, recent head and neck radiation) Severe overeruption of the opposing teeth to avoid any premature contact with the temporary crown during the osseointegration period. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Faculty of Dentistry | Giza |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Cairo University |
Egypt,
Araújo, M.G. et al., 2005. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. Journal of clinical periodontology, 32(6), pp.645-52. Brosh, T., Pilo, R. & Sudai, D., 1998. The influence of abutment angulation on strains and stresses along the implant/bone interface: comparison between two experimental techniques. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 79(3), pp.328-34. Chrcanovic, B.R., Albrektsson, T. & Wennerberg, A., 2015. Tilted versus axially placed dental implants: a meta-analysis. Journal of dentistry, 43(2), pp.149-70. Del Fabbro, M. et al., 2015. Immediate loading of postextraction implants in the esthetic area: systematic review of the literature. Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 17(1), pp.52-70.
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Implant failure | clinical observation | 3 months interval |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03281148 -
Accuracy in Computer Guided Versus Free Hand Immediate Implantation
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05776498 -
Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Dual Zone Approach Versus Connective Tissue Graft
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03287934 -
Accuracy of Selective Laser Sinteredcomputer Guided Stents Versus Digital Light Processing Stents
|
N/A |