View clinical trials related to Immediate Dental Implant.
Filter by:The original implant treatment protocol recommended that the implant should be placed in a fully healed site and covered with mucosa after placement to ensure osseointegration. The reason was to protect the implant site from bacterial contamination and to avoid loading of the implant. After that, a second stage surgical procedure had to be performed to expose the implant to connect the abutment. However, it was shown that a one stage or non-submerged (NS) approach can lead to successful and predictable outcomes. Customized healing abutments can be used in the non-submerged protocol, protecting and containing the bone substitute during healing, preserving the alveolar contour, preventing food impaction, and eliminating the need for a second stage surgery and. By means of this technique, critical and subcritical contours can be projected speeding up the peri-implant soft tissue conditioning phase in order to achieve final natural-like restorations. This randomized controlled trial will compare the clinical and radiographic hard and soft tissue changes using chairside customized healing abutment versus submerged healing following immediate implant placement in mandibular molars through measuring the horizontal ridge changes by CBCT , the crestal bone loss by a standardized digital x-ray and the soft tissue changes by the pink esthetic score (PES).
The concept of immediate implant placement at the time of tooth extraction was first introduced by Schulte et al. on animal studies. Since then, many follow‑up studies examining different variables have supported the concept of immediate implant placement. pioneered a major contribution to immediate implant placement in human studies which recommended the insertion of an implant into a fresh extraction socket. They advocated immediate implant placement primarily to reduce the number of surgical interventions needed to perform an implant‑supported rehabilitation and shorten the treatment time. Placement of implants immediately into extraction sites allow the surgeon to idealize the position of the implant appropriately with a better rehabilitation of the normal contour to the facial aspect of the final restoration. Immediate implant placement in fresh extraction sockets was reported to reduce alveolar bone resorption. Better esthetic outcomes were achieved including the prosthetic crown length in harmony with the adjacent teeth, natural scalloping and easier distinct papillae to achieve and maximum soft tissue support. Hyaluronic acid is a glycosaminoglycan, this unique molecule is implicated In a variety of biological functions including structural integrity, and the regulation of embryologic development. It is described as a natural organic substance, with physiological therapy activity, main component of the extracellular matrix of many tissues such as the skin, synovial joints and periodontal tissues .
Placing implants immediately after tooth extraction offers several advantages such as preventing bone resorption, maintaining alveolar crest width and height, reducing surgical procedures and treatment time, in addition to good esthetic results. Immediate implant placement after tooth extraction is often associated with a residual gap between the implant surface and the residual bone walls. Osseointegration between the implant surface and the surrounding osseous walls of the extraction socket should increase using materials that promote new bone formation. Since both melatonin and hyaluronic acid are thought to have a positive effect on increasing osseointegration and decreasing inflammation of the tissues; the investigators want to test if adding a mix of hyaluronic acid and melatonin to immediately implant, will give a better implant stability, decreased peri-implant bone loss and decreased post-operative pain versus immediate implant placement without adding any material.