Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Imaging During Transvenous Lead Extraction

ICD Clinical Trial

— ISEE  

Official title:

Intravascular ultraSound (IVUS) Imaging During transvEnous Lead Extraction (ISEE)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04055740
• Other study ID #: IRB18-1600
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: September 13, 2019
• Est. completion date: October 31, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: December 2021
• Source: University of Chicago
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging as a tool for grading the presence and characterization of intravascular lead adherence (ILA, or scarring) to cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) leads during transvenous lead extraction (TLE) procedures in a multi-center study. IVUS should identify the location and severity of these adhesions, which the investigators will then correlate to difficulty of the extraction procedure using metrics like pulses of laser energy delivered and time required to traverse an area of fibrosis or ILA. The investigators will be focusing primarily on the section from innominate vein (INNV) down through the superior vena cava (SVC) to the right atrium. Using IVUS to view blood vessels and the heart structure is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Using it as described in this study is off label because of the manner in which it is advanced to the SVC, through the right atrium. While it is not restricted from use in this way, it is not specifically on-label. It should be noted that the use of IVUS during TLE procedures as proposed in this study is routine at the University of Chicago and patients will undergo this procedure regardless of participation in this study. The EP physician team regards the use of IVUS during TLE to be nonsignificant risk.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 28
• Est. completion date: October 31, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: October 31, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 21 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients at least 21 years of age
• Patients with at least one lead over 1 year dwell time requiring extraction

Exclusion Criteria:

• Inability of patient capacity to provide consent for themselves either due to medical or psychiatric comorbidity
• Venous occlusion to the extent that the IVUS catheter cannot pass
• Leads < 1 year dwell time requiring extraction

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Device Malfunction
• ICD
• Pacemaker Lead Dysfunction

Intervention

Device:
• IVUS Imaging
IVUS or radial-ICE (intracardiac echocardiography) is a visualization tool used in many cardiac procedures including electrophysiology procedures (catheter ablation). Its utility in identifying ILA will be assessed in this study.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	The University of Chicago	Chicago	Illinois

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Chicago

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (19)

Biefer HR, Hürlimann D, Grünenfelder J, Salzberg SP, Steffel J, Falk V, Starck CT. Generator pocket adhesions of cardiac leads: classification and correlation with transvenous lead extraction results. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Sep;36(9):1111-6. doi: 10.1111/pace.12184. Epub 2013 May 28. Erratum in: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Oct;37(10):1421. — View Citation

Bongiorni MG, Di Cori A, Soldati E, Zucchelli G, Arena G, Segreti L, De Lucia R, Marzilli M. Intracardiac echocardiography in patients with pacing and defibrillating leads: a feasibility study. Echocardiography. 2008 Jul;25(6):632-8. — View Citation

Bracke F. Complications and lead extraction in cardiac pacing and defibrillation. Neth Heart J. 2008 Oct;16(Suppl 1):S28-31. — View Citation

Brunner MP, Cronin EM, Wazni O, Baranowski B, Saliba WI, Sabik JF, Lindsay BD, Wilkoff BL, Tarakji KG. Outcomes of patients requiring emergent surgical or endovascular intervention for catastrophic complications during transvenous lead extraction. Heart Rhythm. 2014 Mar;11(3):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.12.004. Epub 2013 Dec 4. — View Citation

Di Valentino M, Alerci M, Bogen M, Tutta P, Sartori F, Marty B, von Segesser L, Gallino A. Telementoring during endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a prospective study. J Endovasc Ther. 2005 Apr;12(2):200-5. — View Citation

Enriquez A, Saenz LC, Rosso R, Silvestry FE, Callans D, Marchlinski FE, Garcia F. Use of Intracardiac Echocardiography in Interventional Cardiology: Working With the Anatomy Rather Than Fighting It. Circulation. 2018 May 22;137(21):2278-2294. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031343. Review. — View Citation

Ganguli S, Hawkins BM, Abtahian F, Abu-Fadel MS, Walker TG, MacKay C, Jaff MR, Weinberg I. Comparison of Inferior Vena Cava Filters Placed at the Bedside via Intravenous Ultrasound Guidance Versus Fluoroscopic Guidance. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;39:250-255. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Aug 28. — View Citation

Greenspon AJ, Patel JD, Lau E, Ochoa JA, Frisch DR, Ho RT, Pavri BB, Kurtz SM. 16-year trends in the infection burden for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the United States 1993 to 2008. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 30;58(10):1001-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.033. — View Citation

Jeyabalan G, Wallace JR, Chaer RA, Leers SA, Marone LK, Makaroun MS. Endovascular strategies for treatment of embolizing thoracoabdominal aortic lesions. J Vasc Surg. 2014 May;59(5):1256-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.11.068. Epub 2014 Jan 14. — View Citation

Joy PS, Kumar G, Poole JE, London B, Olshansky B. Cardiac implantable electronic device infections: Who is at greatest risk? Heart Rhythm. 2017 Jun;14(6):839-845. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Mar 16. — View Citation

Kassavin DS, Constantinopoulos G. The transition to IVUS-guided IVC filter deployment in the nontrauma patient. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011 Feb;45(2):142-5. doi: 10.1177/1538574410393753. Epub 2011 Jan 28. — View Citation

Kolluri R, Fowler B, Ansel G, Silver M. A novel duplex finding of superficial epigastric vein flow reversal to diagnose iliocaval occlusion. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 May;5(3):358-362. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.01.017. — View Citation

Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Wilkoff BL, Berul CI, Birgersdotter-Green UM, Carrillo R, Cha YM, Clancy J, Deharo JC, Ellenbogen KA, Exner D, Hussein AA, Kennergren C, Krahn A, Lee R, Love CJ, Madden RA, Mazzetti HA, Moore JC, Parsonnet J, Patton KK, Rozner MA, Selzman KA, Shoda M, Srivathsan K, Strathmore NF, Swerdlow CD, Tompkins C, Wazni O. 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction. Heart Rhythm. 2017 Dec;14(12):e503-e551. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 15. Review. Erratum in: Heart Rhythm. 2021 Oct;18(10):1814. — View Citation

Lewis RK, Pokorney SD, Greenfield RA, Hranitzky PM, Hegland DD, Schroder JN, Lin SS, Milano C, Daubert JP, Smith PK, Hurwitz LM, Piccini JP. Preprocedural ECG-gated computed tomography for prevention of complications during lead extraction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Oct;37(10):1297-305. doi: 10.1111/pace.12485. Epub 2014 Sep 8. — View Citation

Maytin M, Epstein LM, John RM. Lead implant duration does not always predict ease of extraction: extraction sheath may be required at < 1 year. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Dec;34(12):1615-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03225.x. Epub 2011 Oct 20. — View Citation

Mazzone P, Tsiachris D, Marzi A, Ciconte G, Paglino G, Sora N, Sala S, Vergara P, Gulletta S, Della Bella P. Predictors of advanced lead extraction based on a systematic stepwise approach: results from a high volume center. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Jul;36(7):837-44. doi: 10.1111/pace.12119. Epub 2013 Mar 19. — View Citation

Mond HG, Irwin M, Ector H, Proclemer A. The world survey of cardiac pacing and cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2005 an International Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology Society (ICPES) project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Sep;31(9):1202-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01164.x. — View Citation

Sadek MM, Cooper JM, Frankel DS, Santangeli P, Epstein AE, Marchlinski FE, Schaller RD. Utility of intracardiac echocardiography during transvenous lead extraction. Heart Rhythm. 2017 Dec;14(12):1779-1785. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Aug 24. — View Citation

Santoshi RKN, Lakhanpal S, Satwah V, Lakhanpal G, Malone M, Pappas PJ. Iliac vein stenosis is an underdiagnosed cause of pelvic venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018 Mar;6(2):202-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Dec 29. — View Citation

* Note: There are 19 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	IVUS Grades	Operators will be able to successfully grade the degree of intravascular lead adherence (ILA) seen using IVUS imaging.	6 hours
Secondary	Extraction Difficulty Metrics	Operators will record the energy and time necessary to traverse binding sites and will be able to correlate these two metrics to IVUS ILA grade	Through study completion, expected to be 6 months