Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03548831
Other study ID # IEC 429/2014
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date August 2014
Est. completion date June 2016

Study information

Verified date May 2018
Source Manipal University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Minilaparotomy hysterectomy (MLH) relies on the simplicity of traditional open technique of abdominal hysterectomy, imparts cosmesis and faster recovery of laparoscopic hysterectomy yet avoids the long learning curve, cost of expensive setup and instrumentation associated with the minimally invasive approaches namely laparoscopy and robotics. In the present study, we tried to ascertain if the results obtained with MLH can be compared to LAVH in terms of its feasibility, intraoperative variables, and complications. The null hypothesis was that both MLH and LAVH are comparable techniques, so where cost and surgeon's experience are the confining issues, patients can be reassured that MLH gives comparable results.


Description:

Around 600,000 hysterectomies are performed every year in the United States, making hysterectomy the second most common surgery for women, first being cesarean section. Most of the hysterectomies are done for non cancerous conditions. And the most common indication for the same is symptomatic fibroid uterus.

In spite of being the most common gynaecological surgery the route of hysterectomy has always been an issue of debate since early 19th century. In the beginning it started as vaginal hysterectomy which soon was taken over by laparotomy route. With the advent of laparoscopy as the recent minimally invasive route the choices have further increased. Laparoscopic route has prompted the need for development of other forms of hysterectomy which are minimally invasive and are associated with less perioperative morbidity with better postoperative outcomes. Abdominal route includes both conventional and minilaparotomy; laparoscopic route includes both Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy (LAVH) as well as Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH). Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. The vaginal route is preferable because it is associated with less perioperative morbidity and faster recovery. Although laparoscopic route offers minimally invasive alternative to abdominal hysterectomy when vaginal route is contraindicated (In case of huge fibroid uterus or patients with pelvic pathology), it has its own drawbacks. The laparoscopic instruments are costly, there is a long learning curve involved in the training, and the operating time with this route is prolonged.

The EVALUATE study suggested that majority of surgeons(67%) preferred abdominal approach as the route of surgery, especially when dealing with pelvic pathology. Hence, minilaparotomy hysterectomy as an alternative minimally invasive surgery method was started. It relies on traditional open techniques and inexpensive instrumentation, making it significantly faster than laparoscopy and easy to perform. Hoffman et al found minilaparotomy hysterectomy procedure effective and safe in non-obese women in whom vaginal approach was contraindicated. Fanfani et al did a retrospective analysis on 252 patients who underwent minilaparotomy hysterectomy and found it to be a feasible route of surgery in benign gynaecological conditions with operative time similar or shorter as compared to vaginal, laparotomy and laparoscopy surgery. Few surgeons have modified the incision depending on the their experience which led to development of Pelosi method of Minilaparotomy Hysterectomy in 2003.

The final choice of the route and method depends on multiple factors which include indication of surgery, size of fibroid, equipments available in the surgical set up, surgeons' expertise, patient's financial background.

All patients followed the same standard pre-operative protocol. All surgeries were performed under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Demographic details that included age, parity, body mass index (BMI), baseline investigations, diagnosis, and co-morbidities, were collated a day prior to the day of surgery. On admission, patients were informed in detail about the operation modalities and the associated complications. Patients along with their relatives were counselled about the advantages and disadvantages of both the surgical methods and the final decision was made on a joint consensus between the surgeon and the patient, following which an informed written consent was obtained.

The aim of the study was to compare the feasibility of two minimally invasive surgical procedures in low resource settings (such as India) - Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and Minilaparotomy hysterectomy (transverse suprapubic incision <7cm).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 52
Est. completion date June 2016
Est. primary completion date June 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers
Gender Female
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Non descent uterus with benign gynaecological conditions

Exclusion Criteria:

- Uterine size > 20 weeks

- Minilaparotomy was contraindicated in patients where severe adhesions might exist eg -

- Endometriosis

- Previous pelvic inflammatory disease

- Patients with one or more contraindications for LAVH were excluded -

- Cardiac or respiratory morbidity contraindicating laparoscopy

- Frozen pelvis

- Cervix flushed with vagina

Study Design


Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Manipal University

References & Publications (5)

Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Longo R, Marana E, Mancuso S, Scambia G. Minilaparotomy in the management of benign gynecologic disease. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Apr 1;119(2):232-6. — View Citation

Garry R, Fountain J, Brown J, Manca A, Mason S, Sculpher M, Napp V, Bridgman S, Gray J, Lilford R. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. Health Technol Assess. 2004 Jun;8(26):1-154. — View Citation

Hoffman MS, Lynch CM. Minilaparotomy hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Aug;179(2):316-20. — View Citation

Pelosi MA 2nd, Pelosi MA 3rd. Pelosi minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a non-endoscopic minimally invasive alternative to laparoscopy and laparotomy. Surg Technol Int. 2004;13:157-67. Review. — View Citation

Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1091-5. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other BMI Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2 Pre operatively
Primary Duration of surgery All surgeries were performed by two gynecologists with an almost equal level of surgical competence. Intra operatively
Primary Blood loss Total amount of blood loss was calculated during both the methods. It was calculated by adding up the mop count (one fully soaked mop ~ 50 ml of blood loss) and the amount of fluid in the suction pump minus the saline used for irrigation. Intra operatively
Primary Postoperative pain There are various methods to score pain. In our study, we used visual analogue scale for the scoring. The pain was scored every 6th hourly for the first 24hrs and thereafter 24th hourly till 72 hrs.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (Figure 14) is a scoring scale on which the patient rates his/her pain on a scale of 0 to 10, 0 representing no pain and 10 representing excruciating or intolerable pain. The scoring is subjective and gives the patient freedom to choose the intensity of the pain as per their perception.
Starting from immediate post-operative period till 72 hours.
Secondary Weight of uterus In grams unit Intra operatively
Secondary Intra-operative complications Visceral injury such as bladder/ ureter / bowel injury Intra-operatively
Secondary Conversion rate Conversion to conventional laparotomy Intraoperatively
Secondary Post operative complications Secondary haemorrhage, Urinary Tract Infection, Urinary retention, Wound infection, Thrombo-embolic complications, Febrile morbidity Upto 1 month
Secondary Duration of hospital stay In days Upto 1 month
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05337566 - Does Additional Use of Preoperative Azithromycin Decrease Posthysterectomy Infections N/A
Recruiting NCT04130464 - Intraperitoneal Infusion of Analgesic for Postoperative Pain Management Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05537727 - Robotic MIS With Dexter
Completed NCT05037383 - Motion and Viewing Analysis of Surgeons During Minimally Invasive Gynecological Interventions N/A
Completed NCT04080323 - Single-dose Vaginal Dinoprostone and Hysterectomy Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT06011538 - Web-based Versus Standard Information for Same Day Hysterectomy (WISH) N/A
Completed NCT03187327 - Feasibility of Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Vaginal Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology N/A
Terminated NCT00551785 - Surveillance Study of Women Taking Intrinsa® Phase 4
Completed NCT00528177 - Morphine vs. Oxycodone for Postoperative Pain Management Phase 4
Completed NCT03641625 - Effect of SmtO2 Guided Care on PONV (iMODIPONV) N/A
Terminated NCT03500744 - Erector Spinae Plane Block for Major Gynecologic and Urologic Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT03294343 - Risk-Reducing Surgeries for Hereditary Ovarian Cancer N/A
Completed NCT03610425 - A Standardized Bundle Protocol to Optimize Outcomes With Patients Undergoing Gynecological Surgery
Completed NCT05659303 - Evaluation of an Outpatient Protocol in Patients Operated for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Completed NCT05270447 - Short-Term Effects of Connective Tissue Massage After Hysterectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT05031182 - Tolerance of the vNOTES Surgical Technique in Total Hysterectomy for Benign Lesion. Clinical Trial of Non-inferiority Compared to the Laparoscopic Technique. N/A
Completed NCT03634306 - Ultravision Visual Clearing System in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Myomectomy N/A
Completed NCT01526668 - Follow-up Strategies for Improved Postoperative Recovery After Benign Hysterectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT05374720 - Analysis of the Molecular Composition of Tubal Cilia in Patients With or Without Ectopic Pregnancy N/A
Recruiting NCT04109989 - Clinical Assessment - HominisTM Surgical System N/A