View clinical trials related to Hypothermia, Accidental.
Filter by:Hypothermia (core temperature ≤35°C) is a frequent and life-threatening complication after mountain accidents, near-drowning, and intoxications, and can provoke arrhythmia, reduced cardiac contractility, and cardiac arrest. The hypothermic heart may be insensitive to defibrillation with a core temperature <30°C. Also, below <30°C after successful defibrillation, a perfusing rhythm often degenerates to ventricular fibrillation (VF) again. Repeated defibrillation can induce myocardial injury. Thus, the guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) suggest delaying further defibrillation attempts until the core temperature is >30°C if VF persists after 3 shocks. Epinephrine should be withheld if core temperature is <30°C. Advanced Life Support (ALS) guidelines of the American Heart Association (AHA) state that it may be reasonable to perform further defibrillation attempts according to the standard algorithm and to consider administration of a vasopressor during cardiac arrest (Table 1). This discrepancy between ERC and AHA guidelines can be explained by the different interpretations of mainly animal data, which show that vasopressors increase the chances of successful defibrillation <30°C, defined as return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) for at least 30 seconds. The guidelines of the Wilderness and Environmental Medicine Society (WMS) state that a single shock at a maximum power can be given for patients with a temperature <30°C. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical course of hypothermic patients(<30°C) undergoing defibrillation. The primary aim is to evaluate the success ratio of defibrillation, defined as ROSC for at least 30 seconds. Secondary aims are the recurrence rate of ventricular fibrillation, the number of defibrillation attempts per patient, the presence of cardiac dysfunction after defibrillation and the cerebral performance category (CPC) score at the end of hospitalization.
This study aims to report mortality and neurological outcome 180 days after drowning incident in patients with accidental hypothermia vs normothermia following drowning-related OHCA in Denmark during a six-year period from 2016-2021.
Randomized control study with a control group and 90 days follow-up for assessing the decrease in the incidence of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia in the osteosynthesis surgical patients after the application of a bundle in prevention measures during the perioperative period, assessing thermal comfort, tremors (validation into spanish a tremors assessment scale), surgical site infections and readmissions.
A significant risk associated with hypothermia during exercise in a cold environment is the core temperature (T°core) afterdrop, which corresponds to a continuous fall in T°core during rewarming after hypothermia. However, the rate and predictors of the afterdrop are unclear, particularly during prolonged cold water swimming. The investigators propose to measure the changes in T°core during and after a cold water swim at 12.5-13°C qualifying for English Channel swim and to test the impact of anthropometric and swimming parameters on the duration of the T°core afterdrop. The hypotheses are that afterdrop is common during a prolonged cold water swimming event and that protective factors against T°core drop during cold water swimming (increased body fat and BMI) might, conversely, be associated with prolonged afterdrop.
Accidental perioperative hypothermia is a frequent complication of anesthesia that favors the occurrence of infections, bleeding and perioperative cardiovascular accidents, and is responsible for perioperative excess mortality. Although preventive measures are widely used, it remains very frequent in France. This observation led a group of experts to draft, under the aegis of the Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR), several recommendations aimed at improving the prevention of perioperative accidental hypothermia. Perioperative hypothermia is defined as a core body temperature below 36.0 ° Celsius. This study aims to evaluate the impact of hypothermia prevention training on the proportion of hypothermic patients in the operating room.
The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled study is to compare the efficiency in preventing perioperative hypothermia of a continuous active prewarming combined with active intraoperative warming versus passive prewarming plus intraoperative warming for short outpatient surgery.
In an avalanche burial with an air pocket hypercapnia (and hypoxia) develops within few minutes, hypercapnia increases the rate of cooling and therefore the development of hypothermia. The Triple H Syndrome (Hypoxia, Hypercapnia, Hypothermia) occurs. This specific combination of the three parameters is unique for avalanche burial with an air pocket. Every single parameter has a substantial effect on the hemoglobin-oxygen dissociation curve, but until now no study described the combination of these three parameters. This curve will be measured under these specific conditions in a specifically developed in vitro model, to quantify its shifts and to show if there are combined effects of pCO2 and temperature. The newly developed method will be validated in comparison with an established method. The project will be performed with whole blood, drawn by healthy volunteers, in an experimental setting. The samples will be blinded to the investigator and analyzed in a randomized manner.
The aim of this clinical investigation is to prove that the thermal suit with forced-air warming is more effective to prevent inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia than conventional warming methods. The study group will have the thermal suit from arriving to the hospital until to the ward after surgery. In the operating theatre forced-air warming device will be connected to the trouser legs of the thermal suit and the device will be turned on during surgery. The control group will have normal hospital clothes. Intraoperative warming will be managed with the warming mattress and a forced-air warming blanket. The primary endpoint is core temperature after arriving to the post-anaesthesia care unit.
In this study two warming methods will be compared in knee arthroplasty surgery. Barrier EasyWarm will be used in the study group and BairHugger upper body warming blanket in the control group. Both groups will be prewarmed 30 minutes before spinal anaesthesia. In the operating room warming will be continued with the same warming method. Primary end point is core temperature after arriving to post anaesthesia care unit. Hypothesis is that Barrier EasyWarm is not inferior to BairHugger in preventing inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia. Few methods exist to measure the core temperature non-invasively. Zero-heat-flux technique is used in this study. During the study we will test the accuracy of the 3M BairHugger Temperature Monitoring System by placing two sensors onto the patients (n = 30) fore head. After that the accuracy of the Dräger Tcore is examined by comparing it with the 3M BairHugger Temperature Monitoring System. So the patients (n=30) have both these different core temperature monitoring systems on their foreheads. This observational monitoring study is performed from the patient number 80 until the end.
This study examined whether 20 minutes of prewarming prior to gynecological laparoscopic surgery prevented inadvertent post-operative hypothermia. Treatment group received prewarming using a forced air body warming, control group received no active warming system. Both groups were then warmed with forced air warmer intraoperatively.