Clinical Trials Logo

Hyperoxemia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Hyperoxemia.

Filter by:
  • Recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05912543 Recruiting - Hyperoxemia Clinical Trials

A Titration of Fractional Inspired Oxygen Using Oxygen Reserve Index in Child

Start date: July 25, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to determine whether using the Oxygen Reserve Index can prevent hyperoxemia in pediatric patients receiving single-lung ventilation. Participants will have their FiO2 adjusted in a prescribed manner based on the arm to which they are assigned. The researchers will compare whether blood oxygen levels were lower in the ORI group.

NCT ID: NCT04772183 Recruiting - Respiratory Failure Clinical Trials

OxyGap : Comparison Between Different Pulse Oximeter and With the Arterial Blood Gase

OxyGap
Start date: March 24, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The oximeter is used to monitor intensive care patients undergoing oxygen therapy. It indicates pulsed oxygen saturation (SpO2), a reflection of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) which enables detection of hypoxemia and hyperoxia, both deleterious state. Current SpO2 recommendations aim to reduce both risk of hypoxemia and hyperoxia. SpO2 is considered the 5th vital sign. Current recommendations for SpO2 targets do not consider the variability of oximeters used in clinical practice. This variability and lack of specification represent an obstacle to an optimal practice of oxygen therapy. Thus, this study aims to compare the SpO2 values of different oximeters (Nonin, Masimo, Philips, Nellcor) used in clinical practice with the SaO2 reference value obtained by an arterial gas in order to specify the precision and the systematic biases of the oximeters studied. This data will also make it possible to refine the recommendations concerning optimal oxygenation

NCT ID: NCT04198077 Recruiting - Critical Illness Clinical Trials

Conservative Versus Conventional Oxygen Administration in Critically Ill Patients

Start date: December 4, 2019
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Oxygen supplementation in the inspired mixture is commonly used in critically ill patients and observational studies highlight that those patients remain hyperoxemic for substantial periods during Intensive Care Unit stay. However, exposure to inhaled oxygen-enriched mixtures is widely recognized as potentially harmful and cause of organ damage. Although, the specific level of arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) considered harmful, or the dangerous duration of hyperoxia, is not determined yet as there are no clinical trials on humans that evaluate the appropriate percentage of oxygen considered safe to maintain an adequate tissue oxygen availability. The study is designed as a multicentre, open-label, two parallel groups, randomized superiority clinical trial. The study will involve 10 European intensive care units and will recruit adult critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation with an expected length of stay of more than 72 hours admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. Within the conventional group, participants will receive an inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) aiming to maintain an oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) equal or major than 98 percentage, accepting an upper limit of PaO2 of 150 mmHg and a lower limit of 60 mmHg. Patients in the conservative group will receive the lowest FiO2 to maintain SpO2 between 94 and 98 percentage, or when available a PaO2 between 60 mmHg and 100 mmHg. The primary objective of this study is to verify the hypothesis that strict maintenance of normoxia improves survival in a wide population of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients compared to the application of conventional more liberal strategies of oxygen administration. Survival will be measured at Intensive Care Unit discharge. The confirmation of the efficacy of a conservative strategy for oxygen administration in reducing the mortality rate among critically ill patients will lead to a profound revision of the current clinical practice and a rationale revision of the current recommendations would be mandatory, maybe also in other clinical scenarios such as emergency departments.