Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01617655
Other study ID # EFC12732
Secondary ID U1111-1128-54592
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received June 8, 2012
Last updated September 27, 2016
Start date June 2012
Est. completion date January 2015

Study information

Verified date September 2016
Source Sanofi
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Alirocumab (SAR236553/REGN727) is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9).

Primary Objective of the study:

To evaluate the effect of alirocumab on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels after 24 weeks of treatment in comparison with placebo.

Secondary Objectives:

- To evaluate the effect of alirocumab in comparison with placebo on LDL-C at other time points

- To evaluate the effects of alirocumab on other lipid parameters

- To evaluate the safety and tolerability of alirocumab


Description:

The maximum study duration was planned to be 89 weeks per participant including participants who successfully completed the 78-week treatment period had the possibility to join an open-label extension study (LTS13463, NCT01954394) at the end of the treatment period.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 107
Est. completion date January 2015
Est. primary completion date May 2014
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion criteria:

- Participants with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia who were not adequately controlled with their lipid-modifying therapy.

Exclusion criteria:

- Age < 18 years

- LDL-C < 160 mg/dL (< 4.14 mmol/L) at the screening visit (Week-3).

- Fasting serum triglycerides > 400 mg/dL (> 4.52 mmol/L) during the screening period.

- Known history of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Intervention

Drug:
Alirocumab
Solution for subcutaneous injection in the abdomen, thigh, or outer area of the upper arm by self-injection or by another designated person using auto-injector (also known as pre filled pen).
Placebo (for alirocumab)
Solution for subcutaneous injection in the abdomen, thigh, or outer area of the upper arm by self-injection or by another designated person using auto-injector (also known as pre filled pen).
Lipid Modifying Therapy (LMT)
Statin (rosuvastatin, simvastatin or atorvastatin) at stable dose with or without other LMT as clinically indicated.

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Investigational Site Number 124704 Quebec
Canada Investigational Site Number 124703 Sherbrooke
Netherlands Investigational Site Number 528701 Amsterdam
Netherlands Investigational Site Number 528713 Amsterdam
Netherlands Investigational Site Number 528704 Groningen
Netherlands Investigational Site Number 528716 Leiden
Netherlands Investigational Site Number 528709 Utrecht
Russian Federation Investigational Site Number 643706 Arkhangelsk
Russian Federation Investigational Site Number 643705 Kazan
Russian Federation Investigational Site Number 643703 Moscow
Russian Federation Investigational Site Number 643708 Moscow
Russian Federation Investigational Site Number 643711 Moscow
Russian Federation Investigational Site Number 643702 Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Investigational Site Number 643709 St-Petersburg
Russian Federation Investigational Site Number 643710 St-Petersburg
Russian Federation Investigational Site Number 643707 Yaroslavl
South Africa Investigational Site Number 710701 Bloemfontein
South Africa Investigational Site Number 710704 Bloemfontein
South Africa Investigational Site Number 710706 Cap Town
South Africa Investigational Site Number 710702 Parktown
South Africa Investigational Site Number 710703 Somerset West
United States Investigational Site Number 840742 Bell Gardens California
United States Investigational Site Number 840714 Cincinnati Ohio
United States Investigational Site Number 840736 Dallas Texas
United States Investigational Site Number 840702 Durham North Carolina
United States Investigational Site Number 840738 Miami Florida
United States Investigational Site Number 840701 New York New York
United States Investigational Site Number 840703 Newport Beach California
United States Investigational Site Number 840712 Newport Beach California
United States Investigational Site Number 840743 Northridge California
United States Investigational Site Number 840705 Philadelphia Pennsylvania
United States Investigational Site Number 840709 Philadelphia Pennsylvania
United States Investigational Site Number 840713 Philadelphia Pennsylvania
United States Investigational Site Number 840710 Ponte Vedra Florida
United States Investigational Site Number 840734 Washington District of Columbia

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Sanofi Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada,  Netherlands,  Russian Federation,  South Africa, 

References & Publications (2)

Ginsberg HN, Rader DJ, Raal FJ, Guyton JR, Baccara-Dinet MT, Lorenzato C, Pordy R, Stroes E. Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Patients with Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia and LDL-C of 160 mg/dl or Higher. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2016 Sep 13 — View Citation

Kastelein JJ, Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M, Langslet G, Lorenzato C, Gipe DA, Baccara-Dinet MT. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia not adequately controlled with current lipid-lowering therapy: design and rationale of the ODYSSEY FH studies. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2014 Jun;28(3):281-9. doi: 10.1007/s10557-014-6523-z. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 52 - On-Treatment Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 52 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 i.e. up to 21 days after last injection. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Other Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 78 - ITT Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 78 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 78 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 78 No
Other Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 78 - On-Treatment Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 78 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 78 i.e. up to 21 days after last injection. From Baseline to Week 78 No
Primary Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - ITT Analysis Adjusted Least-squares (LS) means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from a mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were used in the model (ITT analysis). From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 i.e. up to 21 days after last injection (on-treatment analysis). From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 i.e. up to 21 days after last injection. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection). From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection). From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 12 - ITT Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Total-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 52 - ITT Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 52 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from week 4 to week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percentage of Very High Cardiovascular (CV) Risk Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C < 70 mg/dL (<1.81 mmol/L) or High CV Risk Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C < 100 mg/dL (<2.59 mmol/L) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis Very high CV risk participants: Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (heFH) participants with coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalents. High CV risk participants: heFH participants without CHD or CHD risk equivalents. CHD risk equivalent: peripheral arterial disease, ischemic stroke, moderate chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 30 to <60 ml/minute/1.73 m^2 of body-surface area), or diabetes mellitus plus 2 or more additional risk factors (hypertension; ankle-brachial index of =0.90; microalbuminuria, macroalbuminuria, or a urinary dipstick result of >2+ protein; preproliferative or proliferative retinopathy or laser treatment for retinopathy; or a family history of premature CHD). Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from a multiple imputation approach model for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included in the imputation model. Up to Week 52 No
Secondary Percentage of Very High CV Risk Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C < 70 mg/dL (<1.81 mmol/L) or High CV Risk Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C < 100 mg/dL (<2.59 mmol/L) at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis Adjusted percentages at Week 24 from a multiple imputation approach model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 i.e. up to 21 days after last injection. Up to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from a multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24 - ITT Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24 - ITT Analysis Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - ITT Analysis Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 12 - ITT Analysis Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1 at Week 12 - ITT Analysis Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. From Baseline to Week 52 No
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis Adjusted percentages at Week 24 from multiple imputation approach including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. Up to Week 52 No
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis Adjusted percentages at Week 24 from multiple imputation approach including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 i.e. up to 21 days after last injection. Up to Week 52 No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01935674 - Treatment With Rosuvastatin Versus Switching PI (Protease Inhibitor) in Patients HIV With High Cholesterol Levels Phase 4
Completed NCT02890992 - An 8-Week Dose-Finding Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Children and Adolescents With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Phase 2
Completed NCT00653835 - Ezetimibe Plus Simvastatin Versus Simvastatin in Untreated Subjects With High Cholesterol (P03435) Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06008756 - MK-0616 (Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor) Cardiovascular Outcomes Study (MK-0616-015) CORALreef Outcomes Phase 3
Completed NCT02585778 - Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab Versus Placebo on Top of Maximally Tolerated Lipid Lowering Therapy in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia Who Have Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes and Are Treated With Insulin (ODYSSEY DM - Insulin) Phase 3
Completed NCT00329173 - PULSAR - A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Utility of Low Doses of the Statins Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin. Phase 3
Completed NCT04169386 - A Study of PCSK9 Inhibitor AK102 in Healthy Subjects Phase 1
Completed NCT02770131 - Chart Review of Repatha® in Subjects With Hyperlipidaemia
Completed NCT03510884 - An Efficacy and Safety Study of Alirocumab in Children and Adolescents With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Phase 3
Recruiting NCT06275724 - Specified Drug-use Survey of Leqvio for s.c. Injection.
Completed NCT03415178 - Usability Study of the Commercial Auto-injector Device and the New Auto-injector Device (SYDNEY) in Patients With High or Very High CV Risk With Hypercholesterolemia Not Adequately Controlled With Their Lipid-Modifying Therapy Phase 3
Completed NCT01779687 - Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Study Between Raltegravir and Atorvastatin. Phase 1
Completed NCT00328523 - TWICE (Ezetimibe Together With Any Statin Cholesterol Enhancement)(0653-060) Phase 3
Completed NCT05934292 - MK-0616 (Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor) Renal Impairment Study 2 (MK-0616-020) Phase 1
Completed NCT01257971 - Non-interventional Study (NIS) to Assess Reaching of Cholesterol Target Values in Patients Treated With HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors N/A
Completed NCT00163163 - Carotid Atorvastatin Study in Hyperlipidemic Post-Menopausal Women Phase 3
Completed NCT01597700 - Acotral® Versus Zetia® Ezetimibe Bioequivalance Study. Phase 1
Terminated NCT02906124 - Study to Evaluate the Safety of Repatha® in Pregnancy
Completed NCT01711749 - Rosuvastatin Calcium Bioequivalence Study - Fast Phase 1
Completed NCT02065180 - The Effect of a Red Rice and Olive Extract Nutrition Supplement on Cholesterol Levels in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome Phase 4