Comparative Study of Phototherapy for Hyperbilirubinemia

Hyperbilirubinemia Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Comparative Study Between BiliSoft Blue LED Fiberoptic Blanket Phototherapy, Giraffe Spot PT Phototherapy, Natus Blue LED Bank Light Phototherapy, and BiliSoft + Giraffe Spot PT Combination Therapy

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00635375
• Other study ID #: 8828882
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: March 5, 2008
• Last updated: January 9, 2009
• Start date: March 2008
• Est. completion date: August 2008

Study information

• Verified date: January 2009
• Source: GE Healthcare
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Hyperbilirubinemia is a common problem for term and preterm newborns in intensive care nurseries around the world. It is a condition in which there is too much bilirubin in the blood. Bilirubin is a substance that is naturally released when red blood cells break down. In the early newborn period, multiple factors lead to an abnormally elevated bilirubin level. Large amounts of bilirubin can circulate to tissues in the brain and may cause seizures or brain damage. About 6.1% of term newborns and a higher percentage of preterm newborns develop hyperbilirubinemia that requires treatment. Initiating treatment depends on many factors, including the cause of the hyperbilirubinemia, the level of serum indirect bilirubin, the rate of indirect bilirubin rise, and the age of the patient. The goal of treatment is to keep the level of bilirubin from rising to dangerous levels.

The bilirubin molecule absorbs light. Therefore, treatment of hyperbilirubinemia involves exposure of the baby's skin to special blue spectrum light. Phototherapy is globally recognized as the standard of care for treatment of elevated indirect hyperbilirubinemia in the neonatal period. This light exposure converts water-insoluble indirect bilirubin to a more easily excreted soluble molecule. Over the last five years, several devices have been introduced that emit high intensity light in the blue portion of the visible light spectrum. However, despite frequent use of such therapy, the effectiveness of different phototherapy devices has not been adequately compared. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of the blue LED fiberoptic phototherapy with the metal halide spot phototherapy versus blue LED bank light phototherapy versus a combination of tandem therapy on lowering to total serum bilirubin.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 82
• Est. completion date: August 2008
• Est. primary completion date: August 2008
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A to 1 Month

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• > 23 0/7 weeks gestation

• > 500 grams

• Non-hemolytic or presumed physiologic jaundice (within the first 14 days of life)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Known congenital infection (proven bacterial or viral etiology)

• Known hemolytic diseases such as but not limited to ABO or Rh incompatibility, minor blood group incompatibility, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, or hereditary red blood cell membrane defects (Coombs or DAT positive)

• Suspected genetic, syndromic, or hepatic disorder-

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Hyperbilirubinemia

Intervention

Device:
• LED fiberoptic blanket phototherapy (BiliSoft blue LED fiberoptic blanket phototherapy)
35-50 mW/cm2/nm
• Metal halide phototherapy (Spot PT metal halide phototherapy)
29.3-57.6 mW/cm2/nm
• LED bank phototherapy (Natus neoBlue LED bank phototherapy)
12-35 mW/cm2/nm
• Metal halide plus LED fiberoptic blanket phototherapy (BiliSoft and Spot PT)
29.3-57.6 mW/cm2/nm and 35-50 mW/cm2/nm

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	University of Tennessee	Knoxville	Tennessee
United States	Christiana Hospital	Newark	Delaware

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
GE Healthcare

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	The LED Fiberoptic Phototherapy System and metal halide spot phototherapy are will show no difference in therapeutic treatment times compared to the LED Bank Light System.		14 months
Secondary	Combination Phototherapy Systems will show a 20% shorter treatment time compared to single treatment methods alone.		14 months