View clinical trials related to Humeral Fractures.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of continuous interscalene block (CISB) using standard bupivacaine versus a single interscalene injection of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) on pain control following surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures.
A commercially available product clinical study which aims to confirm the safety, performance and clinical benefits to the patient of the Affixus Natural Nail upper arm (humerus) bone nail system for both the implant itself and the instrumentation used during surgery.
With an ageing population, fragility fractures secondary to osteoporosis are on a increasing trend. Proximal humerus fractures are common fractures which account for a significant proportion of these fragility fractures. They significantly affect patients function and independence particularly in the elderly. Currently, treatment options range from conservative treatment with an arm sling to fixation either with plates or intramedullary devices to arthroplasty ranging from a hemiarthroplasty to the latest reverse shoulder arthroplasty. While is there has been a global trend towards surgical treatment for such fractures, there is significant controversy regarding the best treatment with many studies reporting disappointing functional outcomes including residual shoulder pain, limitation in shoulder motion and decreased quality of life regardless of treatment option selected. In this day and age where healthcare cost is a big concern both at the individual patient level but at a government level as well, evaluating the cost effectiveness of treatment becomes essential as well. Currently in Singapore, there have been a significant trend of an increased use of surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures however we have very little data in our local context not only to evaluate the clinical effectiveness but also the cost effectiveness of surgical treatment in comparison to conservative treatment. The primary aim of the study is 1. To understand the epidemiology and prognostic factors for proximal humerus fractures - Incidence - Health service utilization - clinical and functional outcomes 2. To estimate the relative cost-effectiveness of surgical vs non-surgical treatment pathways for managing patients with proximal humerus fractures. We hypothesize that surgical fixation of the proximal humerus is both clinically and cost effective
This is a multicenter, retrospective and prospective, non-controlled post market surveillance study. The objectives of this study are to confirm safety, performance and clinical benefits of the T.E.S.S.® Version 3 Anatomic and Reverse Modular Total shoulder prosthesis and its instrumentation.
The investigators tried to evaluate the results of our patients who underwent plate osteosynthesis with vascularized pectoralis major graft for the treatment of 4-part proximal humerus fractures.
Shoulder pathology has a high prevalence in the field of musculoskeletal diagnoses, as well as being a common etiology in cases of disability. Passive and active-assisted kinesitherapy are used in the physiotherapy protocol. These techniques sometimes lead to feedback of fear and increased sensation of pain on the part of the patient that can slow or hinder the optimal recovery. A randomized clinical trial is intended to demonstrate that techniques for myofascial release of muscles important in the biomechanics of the shoulder, it is more effective than kinesitherapy in improving myofascial and also by eliminating the aforementioned unwanted effects and, therefore, improving the recovery of these processes.
The aim of the study is to show if there is any speed difference of functional recovery for people with humeral fracture, treated by an anterograde nail, which will be inserted through the rotator cuff (the common way) or through the rotator interval split. The patients included in this study will be randomized to one of the two groups. The recovery will be evaluated by the Constant score over time, for a year. The main hypothesis is the rotator interval split approach allows a faster functional recovery after humeral nailing, by avoiding opening the rotator cuff.
The purpose of this study is to determine if using the combination of acetaminophen (also known as Tylenol) and ibuprofen (also known as Motrin or Advil) will provide equal or better pain control as compared to acetaminophen-hydrocodone (also known as Lortab), in children with broken elbows who need surgery. This study will examine whether the combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen can provide pain control as well as or better than acetaminophen-hydrocodone so that doctors might be able to prescribe less acetaminophen-hydrocodone (which can be addictive) to children in the future. Currently, the standard of care for pain control following this kind of elbow surgery is acetaminophen-hydrocodone.
It was conducted a prospective study with a series of 63 patients treated with O.R.I.F. (Open Reduction and Internal Fixation) (group A) and with RSA (Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty) (group B) for three and four-part proximal humeral fractures according to Neer classification system. One independent observer performed clinical and a psychological evaluation at one(T0), six(T1) and twelve months(T2) postoperatively. The Constant's score and The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH score) were used for clinical evaluation, while General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Caregiver Strain Scale (CSS) were used for psychological evaluation.
The management of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) remains a significant challenge in orthopaedics. The acute treatment options for PHFs are numerous and are typically guided by the fracture pattern and functional demands of the patients. The most commonly used methods include non-operative management with a sling or surgical fixation. Although non-surgical treatment is a reasonable treatment option for the majority of humerus fractures, there is an increasing interest in surgical intervention. There are no evidence-based treatment recommendations, thus permitting large local variation in treatment preferences. There are a number of studies in the literature about how outcome measures of the patients after PHFs management change, but these results generally compare functional results before and after treatment. Misra et al. stated that conservatively managed patients with PHFs have more pain and a poorer range of motion than those managed by either fixation or arthroplasty, while cochrane review stated that surgery is not superior to nonsurgical treatment in most proximal humerus fractures. Jayakumar et al. determined that kinesiophobia is one of the strongest predictors of functional limitation and recovery from a PHF is enhanced by overcoming fears of movement or reinjury within a week after injury. There is no clear knowledge regarding how the surgical or conservative management used in the management of PHF affects the early results of assessment parameters. The aim of this study was to compare early results of surgical fixation versus non-operative management outcomes in patients with proximal humerus fractures.