View clinical trials related to Hormone Replacement Therapy.
Filter by:The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the letrozole-stimulated cycle strategy versus the artificial cycle strategy for endometrial preparation in women with irregular menstrual cycles after one cycle of endometrial preparation. The primary question it aims to answer is: • Does the letrozole-stimulated cycle strategy for endometrial preparation result in a higher live birth rate compared to the artificial cycle strategy in women with irregular menstrual cycles after one cycle of endometrial preparation? Participants will undergo screening before endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer, following which they will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: LETS or AC. In the LETS group, investigators will prescribe Femara® 2.5 milligrams (Novartis, Switzerland) at a dose of 5 milligrams/day for 5 days to stimulate follicular development and Cyclogest® 400 milligrams (Actavis, UK) at a dose of 800 milligrams/day for luteal phase support. In contrast, the AC group will receive Valiera® 2 milligrams (Laboratories Recalcine, Chile) starting with a dose of 6 milligrams/day, up to a maximum dose of 12 milligrams/day) and Cyclogest® 400 milligrams (Actavis, UK) at a dose of 800 milligrams/day. Researchers will compare the LETS and AC groups to determine if there are differences in live birth rates.
The goal of this observational study is to compare endometrial stripe thickness in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with a uterus on estrogen replacement therapy using oral progesterone versus the etonogstrel implant for endometrial protection. The main questions it aims to answer are: Aim 1: Characterize the mean endometrial thickness in AYA on estrogen hormone replacement therapy before initiation of progesterone therapy Aim 2: Characterize the mean changes and variability in endometrial thickness in AYA treated for 6 months with either the etonogestrel implant or continuous oral progesterone Aim 3: Assess satisfaction, side effects, bleeding patterns, any progesterone modifications, and adherence in AYA treated for 6 months with either etonogestrel implant or continuous progesterone Participants will be asked to: - Get two pelvic ultrasounds - Fill out two surveys - Continue their current hormone replacement therapy - Initiate one of two progesterone therapies (prometrium 100mg daily or Nexplanon) Researchers will compare the change in endometrial thickness after 6 months of progesterone use to see if there is a significant difference in the mean change between the prometrium and Nexplanon groups.
In this study the investigators will analyze the vaginal microbiome of menopausal women in order to shed light on its potential implication on menopausal symptoms and quality of life. Moreover, the investigators will assess the effect of hormone replacement treatment on symptoms and overall quality of life during menopause and whether women under hormone replacement treatment have distinct vaginal microbiome profiles.
A systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that there is insufficient evidence to recommend one particular protocol for HRT with regard to pregnancy rates after frozen embryo transfer, and no comparison of estrogen dose or route of administration was included in the review[7]. It is worth highlighting that the authors did not find any literature discussing the effect of estrogen dose and route of administration for HRT on reproductive outcomes. In 2016, a retrospective cohort study concluded that there is no difference in live birth rates between a constant dose versus an increasing dose of estrogen in oocyte donation cycles with oral or transdermal supplementation[6]. In order to provide good evidence about pattern of estrogen supplementation in HRT-FET, a randomized controlled study is urgently needed. The present randomized controlled study aims to compare between a constant estrogen dose protocol and a step-wise increasing estrogen dose protocol on the live birth rate of HRT-FET cycles.