Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06186232
Other study ID # OMFS 3310
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 1, 2024
Est. completion date December 1, 2025

Study information

Verified date March 2024
Source Cairo University
Contact Rana Sherif
Phone 01095306060
Email rana-mohamed@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To evaluate the quantity and quality of bone generated, radiographically and histomorphometrically, after guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a membrane of 3D printed custom made (PMMA) and subsequent stability of delayed implant placement.


Description:

Guided bone regeneration (GBR), is the most widely used technique to facilitate bone generation. It depends on using a biocompatible membrane that acts as physical barrier preventing the connective tissue from invading the bone defect. To achieve maximum bone regeneration, GBR membrane should have several characteristics, including: - Biocompatibility. - Proper stiffness for space maintenance. - Prevent epithelial cell migration. - Appropriate resorption time after proper bone regeneration. Membranes used in guided bone regeneration (GBR) may have some limitations as the need of second surgery for removal of the membrane (in case of non-resorbable membranes as titanium mesh or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) membranes), lake of space maintenance (as collagen membranes) in addition to their high cost. Thus, we aim to use a commercially available material as polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) with (GBR) to facilitate bone generation as well as subsequent implant placement. Recent forms of (PMMA), have been certified to be biocompatible and safe for skin and mucosal contact. PMMA is characterized by having high toughness which may provide a space maintenance when using as membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR). The PMMA prosthesis can be pre-fabricated, which results in reduction of surgical time, easy technical handling and good esthetic results. In addition, it has a relatively low cost when it is compared to other types of membranes used in guided bone regeneration (GBR).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 6
Est. completion date December 1, 2025
Est. primary completion date June 1, 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 50 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with edentulous area related to horizontally deficient aesthetic zone of maxilla. - Patients are physically healthy with no medical history of any systemic or local disease that would contraindicate ridge augmentation and/or implant surgery or complicate the healing process. (Severe liver or kidney disease, a history of head and neck radiotherapy, chemotherapy at the time of surgery, uncontrolled diabetes, active periodontal in the residual dentition, inflammatory or autoimmune disorders of the oral mucosa, poor oral hygiene, patient failure to cooperate, and any other disease condition contraindicating the oral surgery). - Non-smokers. - Free from temporomandibular joint disorders and abnormal oral habits such as bruxism. - The edentulous ridges were covered with optimal thickness of keratinized mucosa with no signs of inflammation, ulceration or scar tissue. - The occlusion shows sufficient inter-arch space for future prothesis. Exclusion Criteria: - General contraindications to surgery. - Patients subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before fixation. - Untreated periodontitis. - Poor oral hygiene. - Uncontrolled diabetes. - Pregnant or nursing. - Substance abuse. - Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations. - Severe bruxism or clenching. - Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised. - Treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates. - Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol could not be properly followed

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
guided bone regeneration (GBR).
guided bone regeneration (GBR) using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) polymer as membrane.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Cairo University

References & Publications (7)

AlSubaie MF, Al-Sharydah AM, Nassim HM, Alhawsawi A. Orbital Floor Blowout Fracture Reconstruction Using Moldable Polymethyl Methacrylate: A Report of Two Cases and Their Imaging Findings. Open Access Emerg Med. 2022 May 25;14:223-232. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S359173. eCollection 2022. — View Citation

Benic GI, Hammerle CH. Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration. Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):13-40. doi: 10.1111/prd.12039. — View Citation

Elgali I, Omar O, Dahlin C, Thomsen P. Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited. Eur J Oral Sci. 2017 Oct;125(5):315-337. doi: 10.1111/eos.12364. Epub 2017 Aug 19. — View Citation

Fernandes da Silva AL, Borba AM, Simao NR, Pedro FL, Borges AH, Miloro M. Customized polymethyl methacrylate implants for the reconstruction of craniofacial osseous defects. Case Rep Surg. 2014;2014:358569. doi: 10.1155/2014/358569. Epub 2014 Jun 30. — View Citation

Freitas de Andrade P, Meza-Mauricio J, Kern R, Faveri M. Labial Repositioning Using Print Manufactured Polymethylmethacrylate- (PMMA-) Based Cement for Gummy Smile. Case Rep Dent. 2021 Dec 21;2021:7607522. doi: 10.1155/2021/7607522. eCollection 2021. — View Citation

Khojasteh A, Kheiri L, Motamedian SR, Khoshkam V. Guided Bone Regeneration for the Reconstruction of Alveolar Bone Defects. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul-Dec;7(2):263-277. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_76_17. — View Citation

Lee SW, Kim SG. Membranes for the Guided Bone Regeneration. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov;36(6):239-46. doi: 10.14402/jkamprs.2014.36.6.239. Epub 2014 Nov 12. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other post operative ridge width using bone caliper 6 months postoperative
Other initial implant stability using manual ratchet 6 months post operative
Primary amount of bone gain radiographic using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) 6 months postoperative
Secondary quality of bone regenerated bone core biopsy (histomorphometric analysis) 6 months after surgical procedure
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05013580 - The "Open Wound Bone Augmentation Concept" With Amnion-Chorion Membrane N/A
Completed NCT05311332 - Computer-guided vs. Conventional Cortical Shell Technique for Horizontal Augmentation N/A
Completed NCT06043258 - Bond Apatite in Horizontal Augmentation Versus Bio-Oss N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03635658 - Assessment of GBR in Augmentation of Horizontally Atrophic Maxillary Ridge Using Collagen Membrane Versus Using Titanium Mesh N/A
Completed NCT03153995 - Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Following Self-Inflating Soft Tissue Expander N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06195761 - Computer Guided Modified Ridge Splitting Versus Free Hand Technique in Horizontal Deficiency in Posterior Mandible N/A
Recruiting NCT05418452 - Efficacy of 1% Metformin Gel Mixed With PRF in Augmenting Narrow Ridge Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT03183336 - Horizontal Ridge Augmentation of the Mandible Autogenous Block Grafts N/A
Completed NCT04748952 - Ridge Expansion by Osseodensification
Recruiting NCT05813340 - Vascularized Inter-positional Periosteal Connective-tissue Flap Versus Collagen Membrane in Guided Bone Regeneration N/A
Completed NCT04376060 - The Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Using Equine Xenograft and a Collagenated Porcine Cortical Lamina N/A
Completed NCT05286541 - Buccal Cortical Separation and Lateralization for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation N/A