View clinical trials related to HIV-1 Infection.
Filter by:The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether the probiotic Visbiome Extra Strength reduces inflammation in HIV-infected men and women when compared to a placebo (inactive medication like a dummy pill). The study evaluated whether taking Visbiome Extra Strength by mouth for 24 weeks was safe and well-tolerated for HIV-infected persons on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Probiotics are germs such as yeast or bacteria that are found in food and supplements that are used to improve the health of the digestive system. Many people refer to probiotics as "helpful bacteria." These bacteria live in the body and help the body work normally. In some medical conditions, including HIV infection, helpful bacteria are replaced with bacteria that can change the normal intestinal function and increase inflammation. The investigators tested whether giving a probiotic restored normal intestinal function and decreased inflammation.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of switching to a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) versus continuing on a regimen consisting of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF), elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF), or atazanavir (ATV) + ritonavir (RTV) + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) in virologically suppressed HIV-1 infected women.
The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the antiretroviral activity and the safety/tolerability of open-label doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DOR/3TC/TDF; MK-1439A; DELSTRIGO™) consisting of a single fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of DOR/3TC/TDF 100 mg/300 mg/300 mg in treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected participants with select non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) transmitted resistance-associated mutations.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/ tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) relative to unchanged current antiretroviral therapy (ART) by assessing spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) measured at Week 48 in virologically-suppressed, HIV-1 infected participants aged ≥ 60 years.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) after switching from a stable regimen consisting of emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) or abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) plus a third antiretroviral (ARV) agent in participants harboring the archived nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance mutation M184V and/or M184I in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) -1 reverse transcriptase. This is a two part study. If the rate of virologic failure in Part 1 is deemed acceptable, once the internal data monitoring committee officially completes the interim review, the study will continue to Part 2.
There is a theoretical possibility of a complete suppression of HIV viral replication, subject to the use of highly active associations of more than 25 antiretroviral drugs currently available and good treatment adherence. But a key question remains: whether it can persist viral replication low noise HAART, since several arguments suggest a subclinical escape of the virus to HAART at least in some individuals. The technique proposed in this research consists of the detection and quantification of the linear viral cDNA intra cytoplasmic, as persistent novo infection marker in order to highlight the subclinical replication active in treatment of HIV-1 and consider an optimized therapeutic management of patients. Main objective : Comparing the frequency of patients infected with HIV and treated effectively (HIV viral load undetectable plasma with conventional methods) having the HIV DNA into the cytoplasm of their CD4 + T cells from peripheral blood, as cellular infection marker novo persistent, among patients with a therapeutic regimen contains or not the viral integrase inhibitor raltegravir. Secondary objectives - To evaluate the frequency of patients infected with HIV and treated effectively with the HIV DNA into the cytoplasm of their CD4 + T cells from peripheral blood - Evaluate the causes of persistent infection in de novo virological responders to treatment with ART: presence of the HIV genome encoding strains resistant to treatment ART ongoing noncompliance to treatment, type of antiretroviral therapy, CD4 nadir , pretreatment level of plasma HIV RNA, total duration of ART - Assess the impact of persistent novo infection virological responders: cell activation CD4 + and CD8 +, lack of immunological treatment response, changes in lymphocyte ratio T naïve / memory cells cells, the presence of transient increase viremia, residual viremia levels - Identify virological responders may benefit from treatment intensification
This primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a fixed dose combination (FDC) containing bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) versus dolutegravir (DTG) + a FDC containing emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral treatment-naive adults.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a fixed dose combination (FDC) containing bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) versus a FDC containing abacavir/dolutegravir/lamivudine (ABC/DTG/3TC) in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral treatment naive-adults.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of switching to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) relative to continuing on a baseline regimen consisting of abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) plus a 3rd antiretroviral agent in HIV-1 infected participants.
People who are infected with Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) have a great chance of being cured of the infection when they are treated with sofosbuvir. However, in some instances, treatment with sofosbuvir-containing therapy does not work. It is not known if people respond to retreatment with sofosbuvir, after it did not work the first time. There is an important need to understand retreatment options in those instances. This clinical trial was done to study the response to two different regimens, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with ribavirin, and to see if they are safe and well-tolerated in HCV-infected persons whose previous treatment with sofosbuvir had failed.