Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06064136
Other study ID # 22-AOIP-07
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 2024
Est. completion date March 2026

Study information

Verified date February 2024
Source Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Contact Grégoire MICICOI
Phone 0492036904
Email micicoi.g@chu-nice.fr
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The ilio-psoas conflict is a commonly accepted complication after total hip replacement, often linked to a mispositioning of the acetabular prosthetic component that conflicts with the ilio-psoas tendon. To correct these pains, a psoas tenotomy can be proposed. The results proven by the literature are very satisfactory. Psoas tenotomy is performed endoscopically, arthroscopically, or more rarely open. The contribution of echo surgery allows to limit the scar ransom but also to free itself from a complex infrastructure to the operating room including an arthroscopy column and an intraoperative fluoroscopy for a conventional tenotomy, This also saves procedural and installation time. No studies to date have described ultrasound-assisted psoas tenotomy Yhe investigators conducted a cadaveric study of the feasibility of psoas tenotomy under ultrasound that confirms the feasibility of this technique and the safety of the gesture for the surrounding anatomical structures. The objectives of this study are to assess the feasibility, pain and functional outcomes of ultrasound-assisted psoas tenotomy in patients with ilio-psoas conflict after total hip replacement.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 15
Est. completion date March 2026
Est. primary completion date March 2026
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion criteria: - Patients 18 years of age or older - Indication of psoas tenotomy for ilio-psoas conflict after total hip replacement - Signature of the written informed consent form by the patient - Affiliation to a French health insurance scheme or equivalent Non Inclusion criteria: - Vulnerable people: pregnant or breast-feeding women (patients will undergo a pregnancy test: urinary test), adult under guardianship or deprived of freedom. - Allergies to local anesthetics - Patient on anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents - Contraindication to surgery - Refusal of patient involvement

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Psoas tenotomy under ultrasound
Tenotomy of the ilio-psoas tendon under ultrasound is performed using an ultrasound machine, a 3 mm Acufex hook blade and a specific kit usually used for guided vertebroplasty and which allows the introduction of the Acufex hook blade atraumatically (foam end). The patient, under general anesthesia, is placed in supine position with the hip extending from 15 to 20°.

Locations

Country Name City State
France Nice University Hospital Nice Alpes Maritimes

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Evaluate the success rate of this new ultrasound-guided ilio-psoas tendon tenotomy technique The success of this new ultrasound-guided ilio-psoas tendon tenotomy technique will be assessed by the disappearance of the ilio-psoas conflict after surgery. This criterion will be measured at the first control consultation 3 weeks post-operative
Secondary Evaluate the new ultrasound-guided ilio-psoas tendon tenotomy technique compared to standard practice on pain experienced by the patient The pain felt by the patient will be collected using a numerical scale from 0 to 10 before surgery, 3 hours after surgery, the day after surgery, then 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery. Zero '0', means that the patient has no pain ; '10', means that the patient has extreme pain. The non-inferiority limit is set at 1.5 on the pain EVA scale Pre-operative, 3 hours, 1 day, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-operative
Secondary Evaluate the Oxford Hip Score The Oxford Hip Score is a questionnaire that assesses pain and hip function of patients who have undergone total hip replacement surgery. Patient should reflect on their pain and functional abilities on the previous 4 weeks. The questionnaire is divided into 2 domains (pain and function), each domain being composed of 6 questions. For each question, 5 answers are possible, each with a score of 0 to 4 (None = 4, Minimal = 3, Slight = 2, Moderate = 1, Severe = 0). The total score ranges from 0 (most severe symptoms) to 48 (no symptoms). At baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-operative
Secondary Evaluate the Harris Hip Score The Harris Hip Score assess the results of hip surgery. It is composed of 10 questions divided into 4 domains (pain, function without deformation and amplitude of movements). A score is assigned to each response. The total score varies from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the results and the less dysfunctional the patient At baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-operative
Secondary Evaluation the Postel and Merle Aubigne score the Postel and Merle Aubigne score measures pain, joint mobility and walking. For each question, 6 answers are possible, each one having a score of 0 to 6. The total score varies from 0 to 18, 18 indicating a perfect hip At baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-operative
Secondary Evaluate the technical difficulty of surgical procedure The technical difficulty of surgical procedure will be assessed using a 4-point Likert scale: on the day of the operation, the surgeon will have to answer the question "What was the difficulty experienced by you in the operation?". He may answer by: Very difficult, difficult, moderately difficult or easy. the day after surgery
Secondary Evaluate the operative time The operative time will be expressed in minutes between skin incision and skin closure the day of surgery
Secondary Evaluate the installation time The installation time will be expressed in minutes between the end of intubation and the beginning of the brush the day of surgery
Secondary Evaluate the total blood loss Total blood loss will be calculated according to the ostheo formula, including pre-operative (in the month preceding the surgery) and post-operative (the day after surgery) hematocrit values. This measure makes it possible to accurately assess the hidden blood losses related to the hematic extravasation in the month before surgery and the day after surgery
Secondary Evaluate the length of hospital stay The length of hospital stay will be expressed in hours, between the entry and the discharge of the patient the day after surgery
Secondary Evaluate the scarring after surgery The scarring after surgery will be evaluated at 6 weeks after surgery using a subjective scar satisfaction score (4-point Likert scale), transmitted by the patient himself. The patient will have to answer the question "Are you satisfied with your scar?". He can answer: Very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. 6 weeks post-operative
Secondary Evaluate the impact of the patient's quality of life Quality of life will be evaluated using the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), at inclusion, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after surgery.The EQ-5D-5L comprises a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (VAS). The descriptive system is composed of five health dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) with 5 levels of health (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). For each of the 5 dimensions, the participant's answer is converted to a number between 1 and 5, expressing the health state reported. The responses are combined to produce a five-digit number describing the participant's health status which is converted to a utility value from the country specific value set. The French EQ-5D-5L value set has utility between -0.530 (health condition worse than death) and 1 (best possible health). The VAS records the self-rated health status on a graduated scale from 0 to 100. At baseline, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-operative
Secondary Evaluate the patient satisfaction with the results of the operation Patient satisfaction will be assessed at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-surgery using a 4-point Likert scale. To do this, the patient will have to answer the question: "Are you satisfied with the results of your surgery?". They can answer with: very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-operative
Secondary Evaluate the subjective value of the hip The subjective value of the hip will be assessed at inclusion, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery by the patient himself. By answering the question "What then is the overall percentage value of your hip if a completely normal hip equals 100%?" , the patient should assess his hip on a scale of 0 to 100, 100 corresponding to a perfect hip. at baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-operative
Secondary Evaluate the forgotten hip sensation The forgotten hip sensation will be assessed by the patient himself at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery by answering the question "Have you forgotten your hip?". The patient can answer yes or no. 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-operative
Secondary Evaluate the Forgotten Hip score. The forgotten hip score will be assessed at inclusion, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after surgery. The score is composed of 12 questions assessing the degree of forgetfulness. For each question, the patient may respond with never, almost never, rarely, sometimes, often. at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-operative
Secondary Evaluate the early (< 90 days) and late (> 90 days) surgical complications related to surgery Early complications (< 90 days after surgery) and late complications (> 90 days after surgery) will be sought the day after surgery and throughout the follow-up period. They will be classified as major (infections at the surgical site or medical complications increasing the length of hospitalization) or minor according to the series of the literature During 6 months after surgery
Secondary Evaluate the rate of patient requiring a stay in a rehabilitation center The number of patients requiring rehabilitation will be collected for the duration of the study During 6 months after surgery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Withdrawn NCT04720274 - Utilizing EMG Shorts in Hip Population N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05484778 - Analysis of Balance and Functional Hop Tests Used for Return to Sports in Athletes With Lower Extremity Injuries by Dual Task Study N/A
Withdrawn NCT05030688 - Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block and PENG Block for Hip Arthroplasty N/A
Completed NCT04070430 - Crutch Use After Arthroscopic Hip Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03172923 - Nail Versus Sliding Hip Screw for Trochanteric Hip Fractures N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04925791 - Does Limb Pre-Conditioning Reduce Pain After Hip Arthroscopy N/A
Completed NCT06087549 - PENG Block vs. ESP Block for Pediatric Hip Surgery Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05038709 - Positioning for Hip Arthroscopic Surgery to Reduce Postoperative Numbness N/A
Recruiting NCT04934462 - Evaluation of Non-Surgical and Arthroscopic Treatment for Hip Microinstability N/A
Recruiting NCT05397145 - Iliopsoas Plane Block vs PENG Block for Hip Arthroplasty N/A
Recruiting NCT06212622 - Is the Rate of Early Mobilisation in Hip Fracture Patients Using Alfentanil Better Than Standard Opioid Analgesia?
Not yet recruiting NCT05762588 - JuggerKnot With Broadband PMCF Study
Completed NCT05245097 - Mitigation of Major Hip Injury Due to Fall With a Smart Belt N/A
Completed NCT02990234 - Capsular Repair in FAI Impingement Surgery N/A
Completed NCT02630160 - The Influence of Local Infiltration Analgesia by Catheter in Postoperative Control Pain After Total Hip Replacement Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06332443 - Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Sedation-Epidural Anesthesia to Spinal Anesthesia in Outpatient Hip or Knee Arthroplasty. N/A
Completed NCT05343195 - Balance and Leg Function After Hip Replacement N/A
Completed NCT04210440 - The Treatment of Initial Stage of Hip Osteonecrosis: the Core Decompression N/A
Completed NCT01833481 - THA Kinematics and Sound for Subjects Implanted Using Various Surgical Approaches
Completed NCT03959254 - Specific Protocoled Physiotherapy Treatment for Subjects Surgically Treated for Femoroacetabular Syndrome N/A