Surgical Approach of Hemiarthroplasty After Femoral Neck Fracture: Posterolateral or Direct Lateral

Hip Fractures Clinical Trial

— APOLLO  

Official title:

Surgical Approach of Hemiarthroplasty After Femoral Neck Fracture: Posterolateral or Direct Lateral

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04438226
• Other study ID #: NL63378.100.17
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 1, 2017
• Est. completion date: July 7, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: December 2022
• Source: JointResearch
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Rationale: In the Netherlands the two main surgical approaches for hemiarthroplasty are the posterolateral and the direct lateral approach. Currently there is no conclusive evidence which of these two approaches results in better patient outcomes. Objective: Assessing the patient outcome comparing the posterolateral with the direct lateral approach in patients being treated with cemented hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fractures. Study design: A randomised controlled multi-center superiority trial and natural experiment with an economic evaluation alongside. Study population: All patients older than 18 years with a femoral neck fracture whereby treatment with cemented hemiarthroplasty is recommended according the national guidelines. Intervention: Treatment with cemented hemiarthroplasty using the posterolateral approach. Standard intervention to be compared to: Treatment with cemented hemiarthroplasty using the direct lateral approach. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is the patient-rated quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) at 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes are: ADL functionality (KATZ), Balance test (SPPB), Tendency to Fall (FES-I), Pain (NRS), Re-interventions, Mobility, Discharge destination, Complications, and cost-effectiveness. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The different approaches in the two treatment arms of the randomised controlled trial are widely used techniques in the Netherlands and many of the outcome measures are part of the standard clinical follow-up after hip fracture. Therefore, there is no extra risk or burden for participating patients, except for the time to complete some additional follow-up measurements. The primary outcome measurement and secondary outcomes, will be assessed through questionnaires online, by hardcopy or by phone at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The assessment of the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) balance test, will be performed by one of the study researchers or nurse practitioner to protect continuity and feasibility.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 555
• Est. completion date: July 7, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: January 7, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• = 18 years at time of trauma
• Acute hip fracture
• Hemiarthroplasty as recommended treatment according the national guidelines
• Dutch or English fluency and literacy
• Informed consent or by proxy in patients with mental impairment

Exclusion Criteria:

• Multi-trauma-patient (ISS > 15)
• Secondary surgery after failed internal fixation
• Patients with a known metastatic disease and a confirmed pathological fracture of the hip
• Fracture > 7 days at time of surgery
• High risk of non-compliance/adherence to study procedures (e.g. no Dutch residency during follow-up period, or other factors that impair follow-up data collection)

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Direct Lateral
• Femoral Neck Fractures
• Fractures, Bone
• Hemiarthroplasty
• Hip Fractures
• Posterolateral
• Surgical Approach

Intervention

Procedure:
• Surgical approach
The surgical approach of hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Netherlands	Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis	Amsterdam	Noord Holland

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
JointResearch

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Netherlands, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	EQ-5D-5L	The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system assesses health in five dimensions (MOBILITY, SELF-CARE, USUAL ACTIVITIES, PAIN / DISCOMFORT, ANXIETY / DEPRESSION), each of which has five levels of response (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems/unable to). This part of the EQ-5D questionnaire provides a descriptive profile that can be used to generate a health state profile. Health state index scores generally range from less than 0 (where 0 is the value of a health state equivalent to dead; negative values representing values as worse than dead) to 1 (the value of full health), with higher scores indicating higher health utility. The second part of the questionnaire consists of a visual analogue scale (VAS) on which the patient rates his/her perceived health from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health).	at 6 months after surgery
Secondary	Re-interventions	Number of patients which are undergoing a re-intervention in the first 6 months after surgery	at 6 months after surgery
Secondary	SPPB	Balance test (SPPB)	at 4 months after surgery
Secondary	FES-I	The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) is a short, easy to administer tool that measures the level of concern about fallingduring 16 social and physical activities inside and outside the home whether or not the person actually does the activity. The minimum score is 16 (no concern about falling) to the maximum score of 64 (severe concern about falling).	at 6 months after surgery
Secondary	NRS	Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a numeric scale to assess pain. The minimum score is 0 (no pain) and the maximum score is 10 (the worst imaginable pain)	at 6 months after surgery
Secondary	KATZ	Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) is an instrument to assess functional status as a measurement of the client's ability to perform activities of daily living independently. The Index ranks adequacy of performance in the six functions of bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding. Clients are scored yes/no for independence in each of the six functions. A score of 6 indicates full function, 4 indicates moderate impairment, and 2 or less indicates severe functional impairment.	at 6 months after surgery
Secondary	Mobility	Mobility according to the mobility score. We'll assess the mobility according to the following options: no walking aids, 1 walking stick, walker or two crutches, in-house mobility but outside no mobility without aids, no functional mobility	at 6 months after surgery
Secondary	Complications	The number of post-operative complications	During admission, 3 and 6 months post-operative
Secondary	Discharge destination	Discharge destination: We'll ask where the patient is going to live after discharge, which we compare with the place where the patient was living before the trauma. The options are: independently at home, at home with care, nursing home, rehabilitation center.	After admission, at 3 and 6 months post-operative
Secondary	Cost-effectiveness	An economic evaluation will be performed for physical functioning and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). For estimating QALYs, the patients' EQ-5D-5L health states will be converted into utility scores using the Dutch tariff. QALYs will subsequently be calculated using linear interpolation between measurement points.	at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-operative