Clinical Trials Logo

Hip Fractures clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Hip Fractures.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02998359 Completed - Hip Fractures Clinical Trials

Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Hip Replacement for Intracapsular Hip Fractures

Start date: August 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

In England each year over 9,000 people fracture their hip. Most of these are elderly females with the fracture occurring after a fall. Approximately half of these fractures are classified as intracapsular fractures because of their close proximity to the hip joint. The majority of these fractures are treated surgically by excising the broken femoral neck and removing the femoral head (ball part of the hip joint) and replacing it with an artificial hip joint. This hip replacement has traditionally been a hemiarthroplasty or sometimes termed a 'half hip replacement' in which only the ball part of the hip joint is replaced. An alternative type of hip replacement is the full total hip replacement in which the socket part of the joint is also replaced. This is the operation that is used for replacing arthritic hips. In recent years there have been a number of randomised trials that have compared the outcome for patients with an intracapsular hip fracture treated with either a partial hip replacement (hemiarthroplasty) against those treated with a total hip replacement (THR). Results to date have suggested slightly better long term functional results for those treated with a THR, but it still remains unclear if these benefits are offset by the increased surgical complexity of the procedure and the extra cost involved for a THR. At present the numbers of studies on this topic are too few with limited patient numbers to make any definite conclusions. This study aims to add to the research studies by comparing the two surgical procedures, to enable orthopaedic surgeons to determine the optimum surgical treatment for this common and disabling condition.

NCT ID: NCT02998034 Completed - Hip Fractures Clinical Trials

Cemented Hemiarthroplasty Versus Uncemented Furlong Hemiarthroplasty

Start date: August 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

In England each year over 9,000 people fracture their hip. Most of these are elderly females with the fracture occurring after a fall. Approximately half of these fractures are classified as intracapsular fractures because of their close proximity to the hip joint. The majority of these fractures are treated surgically by excising the broken femoral neck and removing the femoral head (ball part of the hip joint) and replacing it with an artificial hip joint. This hip replacement has traditionally been a hemiarthroplasty or sometimes termed a 'half hip replacement' in which only the ball part of the hip joint is replaced. There are a number of different designs of hemiarthroplasty that may be used. Some of the implants are fixed in place with bone cement whilst the rest are inserted as a press fit without the bone cement. The early designs of implant were all press fit but these designs have now been shown to be inferior to those implants that are fixed in place with bone cement. There are however a number of newer designs of implant that are coated with a substance (hydroxyapatite) that encourage the bone to grow onto the implant to fix it into place. To date these implants have only been compared to the cement fit implants in only one previous study. This study found no notable difference between the two types of hemiarthroplasty. This study aims to add to the research studies by comparing standard cement fit implant with a hydroxyapatite coated press fit implant to assist in determining the optimum surgical treatment for this common and disabling condition. Both implants to be used in this study are still being used extensively within the United Kingdom and worldwide to treat this fracture. The study is therefore using two different implants within their recommended area of use, but in which there is uncertainty as to which is the best implant.

NCT ID: NCT02993341 Completed - Anemia Clinical Trials

Topical Tranexamic Acid (TXA) in Hip Fractures

Start date: November 2016
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Mechanisms by which to reduce exposure to allogeneic blood are of financial and clinical benefit in the hip fracture population. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an inexpensive medication with low complication risk. Its use in the hip fracture population is unproven. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical tranexamic acid in reduction of peri-operative blood loss in hip fracture surgery.

NCT ID: NCT02986399 Completed - Hip Fractures Clinical Trials

Fast Track Hip Fracture - an Optimized Pathway for Hip Fracture Patients

Start date: January 1, 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The study examines if the introduction of a fast track pathway for hip fracture patients had an influence on mortality and quality of life by comparing these outcomes between all hip fracture patients operated at Akershus University Hospital two years before and two years after this change in standard care.

NCT ID: NCT02972918 Completed - Hip Fracture Clinical Trials

Preoperative levosimendán and Hip Fracture

OPL
Start date: May 2014
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether preoperative optimization with levosimendan in heart failure patients undergoing hip fracture surgery improves haemodynamic and tissue perfusion parameters.

NCT ID: NCT02972424 Completed - Clinical trials for Osteoporotic Fractures

PTH(1-34) and Pelvic Fracture Healing - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Start date: May 1, 2017
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

In the proposed trial the investigators will recruit women and men >65 years of age with acute osteoporosis-related pelvic fractures and address 3 specific aims over 3 months of treatment in a placebo controlled double blind study to determine if standard care and teriparatide 20 mcg/day versus placebo for pelvic fractures: 1. Results in earlier evidence of cortical bridging on routine radiographs followed by confirmatory Focus CT, a novel method to reduce radiation exposure from CT scans (primary outcome). 2. Leads to a faster reduction in pain as assessed by both the Numeric Rating Scale and a reduction in the use of narcotics (secondary outcome). 3. Leads more rapidly to improved functional outcome using a short physical performance battery to assess lower extremity function (secondary outcome).

NCT ID: NCT02947529 Completed - Acute Hip Fractures Clinical Trials

Tranexamic Acid Use in Acute Hip Fractures

Start date: August 2015
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been used widely for the reduction of post operative blood loss for various orthopaedic procedures including but not limited to total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty. A recent multihospital meta-analysis conducted in 2013 showed that patients who received TXA showed a significant reduction in post-operative transfusion (20.1% to 7.7%). The procedures the investigators will be evaluating are the intramedullary nail for intertrochanteric fracture and hip hemiarthroplasty. These procedures are similar to the total hip or knee replacement in that they can result in significant blood loss that requires a post operative transfusion. STUDY PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of TXA to decrease the rate of post-operative transfusion for acute hip fractures repaired with the following two methods, intramedullary nailing for intertrochanteric fracture and hemiarthroplasty. METHODS: The model for the study is a prospective randomized control trial. Patients will be placed in one of two arms of the study after passing our inclusion criteria. The arms will be for either the intramedullary nailing for intertrochanteric fracture or for hemiarthroplasty. These two categories will be subdivided into those receiving TXA and those not receiving TXA. The patients in each category will have standard post-operative care and laboratory testing. The investigators will record the patients in either arm of the study, whether it be no TXA or TXA, who require post-operative transfusion within 1 week of the operation.

NCT ID: NCT02938923 Completed - Sarcopenia Clinical Trials

Starting a Testosterone and Exercise Program After Hip Injury

STEP-HI
Start date: March 5, 2019
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This study is a randomized controlled double-blinded multi-center clinical trial enrolling female hip fracture patients who are 65 and older. It will compare the effects of six months of supervised exercise training combined with daily topical testosterone gel, to six months of supervised exercise and inactive gel, and to Enhanced Usual Care. Out of nine participants, 4 will receive topical testosterone gel and a supervised exercise training program; 4 will receive topical inactive gel and a supervised exercise training program; and 1 will receive a home exercise program. All participants will receive nutritional counseling, and calcium and vitamin D supplements.

NCT ID: NCT02855060 Completed - Hemorrhage Clinical Trials

Pre-hospital Advanced Therapies for Control of Hemorrhage - Pelvis

PATCH
Start date: July 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of pelvic binders in the ambulance setting improves outcomes including mortality in patients with pelvic fractures.

NCT ID: NCT02838706 Completed - Anemia Clinical Trials

Elderly With Hip Fracture and Perioperative Hemoglobin and Perfusion Index Levels

Start date: May 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The overall aim of the study is to investigate the time difference in the diagnosing of anemia among elderly with hip fracture, between measurements with standard blood samples and non-invasive SpHb-measuring. Another aim is to investigate the relationship between perfusion index and prolong perioperative anemia and the potential impact on perioperative complications.