Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Block

Hip Fracture Clinical Trial

Official title:

Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Blockade and Standard Parenteral Opioid Pain Management Alone in Patients With Hip Fracture in the Emergency Department

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02381717
• Other study ID #: 2014P000304
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: August 2015
• Est. completion date: December 2026

Study information

• Verified date: April 2024
• Source: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
• Contact: Beatrice Hoffmann, MD PhD
• Phone: 617-754-2323
• Email: bhoffma2[@]bidmc.harvard.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of the study is to evaluate whether pain control achieved by Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Blockade (USFNB) is equal in efficacy to standard pain management practice of parenteral injection of opioid pain medication in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with hip fracture.

Description:

In this proposed protocol the investigators will conduct a prospective, randomized control trial comparing the efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Blockade (USFNB) versus the standard of care pain management by parenteral injection of opioid pain medication of patients presenting with hip fracture at the BIDMC ED. We hypothesize that USNFB approach will be non-inferior in achieving pain control (efficacy) and superior in the total dose of opioids (lower amount) as compared to the standard protocol. The enrolled population will be randomized 1:1 using a simple balanced randomization scheme. Participants will be surveyed six times 6 times on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)* on their pain intensity reduction over 4 hours. Physicians performing the block will be surveyed promptly following the procedure regarding difficulty performing the block and its efficacy. Specific Aim #1: The investigators hypothesize that in patients presenting to the ED with hip fracture, USFNB will demonstrate equal efficacy in pain relief with fewer side effects when compared to conventional parenteral opioid therapy. The investigators evaluate this hypothesis by monitoring Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) in patients receiving either USGFNB or opioid therapy over the first 4 hours of observation. The side effects will be noted during the same interval of time. Specific Aim #2: The investigators hypothesize that in patients presenting to the ED with hip fracture, USFNB will reduce the amount of narcotic used to control pain. The investigators will evaluate this by studying narcotic use over the first 4 hours of evaluation.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 60
• Est. completion date: December 2026
• Est. primary completion date: May 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 101 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients over 18 years of age presenting to the ED with radiographically established intra-, extracapsular hip fracture, able to consent and participate in the study and who have moderate to severe pain (numerical pain score >= 31) at the time of enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with a previous history of hypersensitivity to local anesthetics,
• Patients who have signs of a local infection at the site of planned needle placement.
• INR > 1.4NOAC use within 48 hours
• Prophylactic Low-Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) within 12 hours
• Therapeutic LMWH within 24 hours
• Prophylactic Unfractionated Heparin (5000 Units BID or TID) within 6 hours

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Hip Fracture
• Hip Fractures

Intervention

Other:
• ultra-sound guide
Patients randomized to this arm will have the femoral nerve block with the guidance of a bedside ultrasound

Drug:
• bupivacaine

• morphine

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center	Boston	Massachusetts
United States	St. Vincent's Hospital	Worcester	Massachusetts

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (13)

Baker BC, Buckenmaier C, Narine N, Compeggie ME, Brand GJ, Mongan PD. Battlefield anesthesia: advances in patient care and pain management. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007 Mar;25(1):131-45, x. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2006.12.003. — View Citation

Bijur PE, Kenny MK, Gallagher EJ. Intravenous morphine at 0.1 mg/kg is not effective for controlling severe acute pain in the majority of patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;46(4):362-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.03.010. — View Citation

Christos SC, Chiampas G, Offman R, Rifenburg R. Ultrasound-guided three-in-one nerve block for femur fractures. West J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;11(4):310-3. — View Citation

Fletcher AK, Rigby AS, Heyes FL. Three-in-one femoral nerve block as analgesia for fractured neck of femur in the emergency department: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Feb;41(2):227-33. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.51. — View Citation

Fredrickson MJ, Kilfoyle DH. Neurological complication analysis of 1000 ultrasound guided peripheral nerve blocks for elective orthopaedic surgery: a prospective study. Anaesthesia. 2009 Aug;64(8):836-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05938.x. — View Citation

Grabinsky A, Sharar SR. Regional anesthesia for acute traumatic injuries in the emergency room. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009 Nov;9(11):1677-90. doi: 10.1586/ern.09.110. — View Citation

Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J. 2001 May;18(3):205-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.3.205. — View Citation

Malchow RJ, Black IH. The evolution of pain management in the critically ill trauma patient: Emerging concepts from the global war on terrorism. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7 Suppl):S346-57. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817e2fc9. — View Citation

Marhofer P, Schrogendorfer K, Koinig H, Kapral S, Weinstabl C, Mayer N. Ultrasonographic guidance improves sensory block and onset time of three-in-one blocks. Anesth Analg. 1997 Oct;85(4):854-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199710000-00026. — View Citation

Morrison RS, Magaziner J, Gilbert M, Koval KJ, McLaughlin MA, Orosz G, Strauss E, Siu AL. Relationship between pain and opioid analgesics on the development of delirium following hip fracture. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003 Jan;58(1):76-81. doi: 10.1093/gerona/58.1.m76. — View Citation

O'Donnell BD, Mannion S. Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block, the safest way to proceed? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 Jul-Aug;31(4):387-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.04.007. No abstract available. — View Citation

Platts-Mills TF, Esserman DA, Brown DL, Bortsov AV, Sloane PD, McLean SA. Older US emergency department patients are less likely to receive pain medication than younger patients: results from a national survey. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;60(2):199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.09.014. Epub 2011 Oct 26. — View Citation

Todd KH. Clinical versus statistical significance in the assessment of pain relief. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr;27(4):439-41. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70226-3. No abstract available. — View Citation

* Note: There are 13 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	pain intensity reduction	Evaluation of pain severity and relief will be assessed utilizing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)	4 hours after initiation of study proceduure