High Caries Risk Patients Clinical Trial
Official title:
Clinical Evaluation of Chemically Cured Conventional Glass Ionomer After Light Emitting Diode Radiant Heat Enhancement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Introduction: Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are widely used in clinical dentistry due to their advantageous properties. However, they present inferior physical and mechanical properties compared to resin composites. Aim: Clinical evaluation of chemically cured conventional glass ionomer after light-emitting diode radiant heat enhancement. . Methodology: Eighteen healthy patients with 36-second molar teeth will be selected where each patient should have two oclusso- mesial cavities. Standardized oclusso- mesial cavities will be prepared for all the selected teeth, for each patient the first tooth will be restored with chemically cured conventional GICs without any enhancement (M1 group). Meanwhile, the second tooth will be restored by chemically cured conventional GICs that enhanced with radiant heat (LED) (M2 group). functional and biological criteria of each restoration will be clinically evaluated at 4 time points
Introduction: Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are widely used in clinical dentistry due to their advantageous properties. However, they present inferior physical and mechanical properties compared to resin composites. Various techniques have been suggested to improve properties of conventional GICs such as radiant heat transfer by Light Emitting Diode (LED) or lasers, ultrasonic energy transfer also using of (CaCl2) solution. Aim: Clinical evaluation of chemically cured conventional glass ionomer after light-emitting diode radiant heat enhancement. . Methodology: Eighteen healthy patients with 36-second molar teeth will be selected where each patient should have two oclusso- mesial cavities. Standardized oclusso- mesial cavities will be prepared for all the selected teeth, for each patient the first tooth will be restored with chemically cured conventional GICs without any enhancement (M1 group). Meanwhile, the second tooth will be restored by chemically cured conventional GICs that enhanced with radiant heat (LED) (M2 group). functional and biological criteria of each restoration will be clinically evaluated immediately after restoration (T0), six months later (T1), and after 12 months (T2) using Federation Dentaire International (FDI) criteria for assessment of dental restorations. ;
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT03773094 -
Antibacterial Effect of Guava Leaves Extract Mouthwash Compared to Chlorhexidine Mouthwash in High Caries Risk Patients
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT04566120 -
Streptococcus Mutans Cariogenicity by Real-time PCR in High Caries Risk Patients
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04254835 -
Assessment of Inhibition of Biofilm Formation and Plaque Bacterial Count of Fluoride Varnish Containing Chlorhexidine and Cetylpyridinium Chloride Versus Conventional Fluoride Varnish
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT03684993 -
Caries Prevention and Side Effects of Gum Arabic and Licorice Extracts Versus Chlorhexidine in High Caries Risk Patients
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 |