View clinical trials related to Hiatal Hernia.
Filter by:In 2008, the World Health Organization (WHO) report found that 0.5-1.5 billion people aged 20 years and above suffer from overweight (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25) and obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg / m2) stated. WHO estimates that the number of overweight and obese people will reach 2.3 and 0.7 billion, respectively, by 2045. Bariatric surgery has been developed in response to the number of obese patients living in the world and the complications caused by obesity. The most common type of bariatric surgery against obesity is Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). As after any surgical operation, complications may occur after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Additional operations may be required to correct complications such as bleeding, anastomotic leak, gastric volvulus, infection, dyspepsia, hiatal hernia, bile and/or acid reflux. The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is significantly increased in obese patients compared to the incidence in normal individuals. Various studies have shown that obesity causes delayed gastric emptying due to increased abdominal pressure, esophageal motility disorders, especially hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter pressure (<10 mm Hg), finally the development of hiatal hernia (HH), whose prevalence in the obese population is significantly higher than in non-obese patients. Various surgical methods have been presented to prevent postoperative de-novo Gastroesophageal Reflux and de-novo Hiatal Hernia that occur after LSG. Curorrhaphy is one of these techniques that is accepted to prevent the formation or exacerbation of postoperative GERD and Hiatal Hernia. In this surgical technique, after the diaphragmatic crura are completely exposed at the level of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), the hiatal hernia, if present, is reduced into the abdomen. Afterwards, Z surgical sutures are applied to the diaphragmatic crura to make the diaphragmatic esophageal ring narrow enough. In this way, it is aimed to strengthen the diaphragmatic crus. Findings following cruroplasty for GERD prevention are varied. Although some authors state that the technique does not provide an advantage in preventing postoperative GERD, some studies have shown cruroplasty to be effective. In this study, investigators aimed to show that the technique of simultaneous cruroplasty and single suture omentopexy with LSG is a treatment for GERD and HH, which are very common in obese patients, and a preventive technique for de-novo GERD seen after LSG.
Patients often present with a significant burden of fibrosis upon diagnosis as there is interest in identifying these individuals earlier in their disease course (i.e., "subclinical disease") where targeted treatments and modification of risk factors may curb their progression to fulminant fibrosing ILD. The investigators have investigated with computed tomography (CT) methods such as interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) and high attenuation areas (HAAs) that may detect early radiological signs of interstitial lung inflammation and scarring and novel modifiable risk factors that contribute to its pathogenesis. Among adults without clinically-diagnosed pulmonary fibrosis, those with a hiatal hernia will have higher levels of pepsin in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) compared with adults without a hiatal hernia. Secondarily, examinination on whether there are differences in other reflux contents from BALF including total bile, and peripheral biomarkers related to lung injury and fibrogenesis which include matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125).
Prospective registry comparing outcomes after laparoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatal hernia.
The purpose of this study is to observe the effective and safety in the laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia using biological patch versus plastic.
In 2006 this research group reported their initial findings of a multi-center prospective trial comparing primary repair and primary repair buttressed with a biologic mesh made from porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS). We were able to accrue 108 patients from 7/2002-3/2005 and followed each patient over 6 months and performed an UGI to check the durability of the repair and rule out a recurrence. The results suggested a significant benefit for the use of SIS mesh in the short-term, with the primary group having a 26% recurrence rate and the mesh group a 9% recurrence rate. While these results are encouraging, it is important to know what is the durability and the longer term benefits of the use of SIS mesh. For this reason we propose a follow-up of the original study patients with the same outcome measures (symptom questionnaire, SF-36, and UGI). This should give us a very good idea about the long-term success of laparoscopic PEH repair with primary and SIS mesh.