Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03450473 |
Other study ID # |
WU001 Surgimend Mp® |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 3, 2018 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2023 |
Source |
Washington University School of Medicine |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Large abdominal wall hernias are surgically challenging to repair and often associated with
significant postoperative complications. Risk factors associated with surgical site
complications, such as infection and wound dehiscence, include obesity, diabetes, and
smoking. In these high risk patients, the placement of synthetic mesh increases the risk of
mesh infection, enterocutaneous fistula formation, and mesh explantation. One of the larger
studies of risk factors associated with mesh explantation demonstrated concomitant
intra-abdominal procedures have a greater than 6-fold increased hazard of subsequent mesh
explantation. As an alternative to synthetic meshes, bioprosthetic meshes derived from the
decellularization and processing of allogeneic or xenogeneic tissue sources have been
introduced that can often allow the surgeon to treat the surgical site occurrences and
salvage the repair without required mesh explantation. Low rates of mesh infection and
explantation have been reported for bioprosthetic meshes and are recommended in these
complicated patients by the Ventral Hernia Working Group, based on the best available
clinical evidence. Despite widespread use of bioprosthetic mesh, there continues to be
concern for complications associated with their use (i.e. high seroma and recurrence rates,
etc.). This has led to the modification of these matrices by several industry leaders
(Acelity, Cook, Integra, etc.) to include a fenestrated platform to allow for fluid to flow
through the matrix upon implantation while supporting regeneration in complex abdominal wall
reconstruction. To our knowledge, there are no clinical studies prospectively evaluating the
long term clinical outcomes for abdominal wall reconstruction procedures involving
fenestrated macropourous biologic matrices.This macroporous technology allows for tissue
revascularization and integration of the biologic graft and thus an expected improvement in
overall outcome. Bioprosthetic fenestrated materials such as Surgimend MP® were developed to
assist with earlier incorporation and vascularization of the biologic graft while providing
reinforcement of hernia repair. However, there is an absence of high quality prospective data
regarding the use of these materials in complicated abdominal wall reconstruction, and no
comparative data exists.
This study is a prospective, case series study evaluating the efficacy and performance of
SurgiMend MP® during complex ventral hernia repairs. This case series involves a biologically
derived hernia mesh under its cleared FDA indication for hernia repair. Efficacy will be
determined by quantifying surgical complications, hernia recurrence, and cost effectiveness
endpoints.
Description:
Large abdominal wall hernias are surgically challenging to repair and often associated with
significant postoperative complications. Risk factors associated with surgical site
complications, such as infection and wound dehiscence, include obesity, diabetes, and
smoking. In these high risk patients, the placement of synthetic mesh increases the risk of
mesh infection, enterocutaneous fistula formation, and mesh explantation. One of the larger
studies of risk factors associated with mesh explantation demonstrated concomitant
intra-abdominal procedures have a greater than 6-fold increased hazard of subsequent mesh
explantation. As an alternative to synthetic meshes, bioprosthetic meshes derived from the
decellularization and processing of allogeneic or xenogeneic tissue sources have been
introduced that can often allow the surgeon to treat the surgical site occurrences and
salvage the repair without required mesh explantation. Low rates of mesh infection and
explantation have been reported for bioprosthetic meshes and are recommended in these
complicated patients by the Ventral Hernia Working Group, based on the best available
clinical evidence. Despite widespread use of bioprosthetic mesh, there continues to be
concern for complications associated with their use (i.e. high seroma and recurrence rates,
etc.). This has led to the modification of these matrices by several industry leaders
(Acelity, Cook, Integra, etc.) to include a fenestrated platform to allow for fluid to flow
through the matrix upon implantation while supporting regeneration in complex abdominal wall
reconstruction. To our knowledge, there are no clinical studies prospectively evaluating the
long term clinical outcomes for abdominal wall reconstruction procedures involving
fenestrated macropourous biologic matrices.This macroporous technology allows for tissue
revascularization and integration of the biologic graft and thus an expected improvement in
overall outcome. Bioprosthetic fenestrated materials such as Surgimend MP® were developed to
assist with earlier incorporation and vascularization of the biologic graft while providing
reinforcement of hernia repair. However, there is an absence of high quality prospective data
regarding the use of these materials in complicated abdominal wall reconstruction, and no
comparative data exists.
This study is a prospective, case series study evaluating the efficacy and performance of
SurgiMend MP® during complex ventral hernia repairs. This case series involves a biologically
derived hernia mesh under its cleared FDA indication for hernia repair. Efficacy will be
determined by quantifying surgical complications, hernia recurrence, and cost effectiveness
endpoints.
Subjects will be identified by the investigators and/or personnel assigned by the
investigators, as patients with large complex ventral hernia expected to be repaired with
bioprosthetic mesh.
Subjects will have a baseline visit where they will have a physical exam and complete quality
of life questionnaires and a pain scale. Photographs will be taken at this visit as well.
Demographic and medical and surgical history will be collected. The investigators will then
assess the subject intra-operatively to confirm the need and appropriate placement of
SurgiMend mesh. The subjects that have mesh placed will be followed at hospital discharge, 3
months, 6 months, and 12 months to assess for changes in health, adverse events,
questionnaire completion, and evaluation of surgical site for complications and recurrence.
The visits may take place by phone if the subject cannot return to clinic.