Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02228889
Other study ID # 2014H0041
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 2015
Est. completion date December 2025

Study information

Verified date November 2023
Source Ohio State University
Contact Benjamin Sarac, MD
Phone (614) 293-8566
Email Benjamin.Sarac@osumc.edu
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical outcomes of two commonly used, FDA-approved biologic meshes in hernia repair and abdominal wall reconstruction (Strattice and XenMatrix). The two meshes are derived from pig skin from which cells have been removed and which have been sterilized. The two meshes are made by two different companies using different processes.


Description:

This is a prospective, randomized-controlled trial comparing two porcine acellular matrices in abdominal wall reconstruction. It is single-blind (patients are blinded to the type of mesh used while surgeons are not). Our goals in this study are: 1. PRIMARY OUTCOME: To compare the overall complication rates between two non-cross-linked porcine dermal matrices (XenMatrix and Strattice) at 30 days and 1 year postoperatively 2. SECONDARY OUTCOMES i. To compare the rate of Surgical Site Occurrences (SSOs) between XenMatrix and Strattice in abdominal wall reconstruction at 30 days and 1 year postoperatively 1. Infection 2. Seroma 3. Hematoma 4. Wound dehiscence 5. Skin necrosis 6. Formation of enterocutaneous fistula 7. Mesh infection ii. To compare the hernia recurrence rate between XenMatrix and Strattice at 30 days and 1 year postoperatively iii. To compare the bulge rate between XenMatrix and Strattice at 30 days and 1 year postoperatively iv. To compare to changes in patient pain, physical functioning and quality of life after hernia repair between XenMatrix and Strattice, preoperatively, and at 1 year postoperatively A. Pain assessment: Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity survey, PROMIS Pain Interference survey B. Physical functioning assessment: PROMIS Physical Function C. Quality of life assessment: Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life (HerQLes) survey


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 70
Est. completion date December 2025
Est. primary completion date December 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 99 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Age > 18 - Patients presenting for elective hernia repair, with Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) grade 2 or above (Patients with a hernia who need hernia repair due to hernia size, discomfort, risk of bowel incarceration, effect on physical function), and who have comorbidities or contamination making the use of synthetic mesh contraindicated) - Patients deemed to be good surgical candidates, with no active life-threatening cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, renal disease, hematologic disease (patients who can have a major surgical procedure without an exceedingly high risk of medical complications such as pulmonary edema, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, renal failure, life-threatening bleeding, stroke). - Patients presenting for resection of large abdominal wall tumors who are expected to undergo have tumor extirpative defect that would require biologic mesh for closure (patients with a large tumor of the abdominal wall who will have a large defect in their fascia after resection, who need biologic mesh for reinforcement). Exclusion Criteria: - Known allergy to porcine products - Active smokers (within the past 4 weeks) presenting for elective hernia repair - Patients with active life-threatening cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, renal disease, hematologic disease presenting for elective hernia repair - Patients presenting for emergent hernia repair (in the setting of bowel strangulation, necrosis, penetrating trauma) as it will be difficult to consent those patients for the study preoperatively - Patients with severe systemic sepsis - Patients with frank purulence in the wound

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
Abdominal wall reconstruction with Strattice
Abdominal wall reconstruction using Strattice
Other:
Assess pain intensity at last office visit preoperatively
Assess patient pain intensity preoperatively using the PROMIS Pain Intensity survey (average of 1-3 weeks preoperatively)
Assess pain interference at last office visit preoperatively
Assess pain interference preoperatively using the PROMIS pain interference survey (average of 1-3 weeks preoperatively)
Assess physical functioning at last office visit preoperatively
Assess physical functioning preoperatively using the PROMIS physical functioning survey (average of 1-3 weeks preoperatively)
Assess patient quality of life at last office visit preoperatively
Assess patient quality of life preoperatively, using the HerQLes survey (average of 1-3 weeks preoperatively)
Assess patient pain intensity postoperatively
Assess patient pain intensity at 1 year postoperatively using the PROMIS Pain Intensity survey
Assess pain interference postoperatively
Assess pain interference at 1 year postoperatively using the PROMIS Pain Interference survey
Assess physical functioning postoperatively
Assess physical functioning at 1 year postoperatively using the PROMIS Physical Functioning Survey
Assess quality of life postoperatively
Assess quality of life at 1 year postoperatively using the HerQLes survey
Assess hernia recurrence at 30 days postoperatively
Assess hernia recurrence at 30 days
Assess bulge at 30 days postoperatively
Assess bulge at 30 days
Assess Surgical Site Occurrences at 30 days postoperatively
Assess Surgical Site Occurrences at 30 days
Assess hernia recurrence at 1 year postoperatively
Assess hernia recurrence at 1 year postoperatively
Assess bulge at 1 year postoperatively
Assess bulge at 1 year postoperatively
Assess Surgical Site Occurrences at 1 year postoperatively
Assess Surgical Site Occurrences at 1 year postoperatively
Assess overall complications at 30 days postoperatively

Assess overall complications at 1 year postoperatively

Procedure:
Abdominal wall reconstruction with XenMatrix
Abdominal wall reconstruction with XenMatrix
Device:
Strattice
Strattice mesh
XenMatrix
Xenmatrix mesh

Locations

Country Name City State
United States The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Jeffrey Janis

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Overall complication rate at 1 year Compare the overall complication rates between two non-cross-linked porcine dermal matrices (XenMatrix and Strattice) at 1 year postoperatively 1 year postoperatively
Secondary Rate of Surgical Site Occurrences (SSOs) at 1 year Compare the rate of Surgical Site Occurrences (SSOs) between XenMatrix and Strattice in abdominal wall reconstruction at 1 year postoperatively. These include:
Infection
Seroma
Hematoma
Wound dehiscence
Skin necrosis
Formation of enterocutaneous fistula
Mesh infection
1 year postoperatively
Secondary Hernia recurrence rate at 30 days 30 days postoperatively
Secondary Bulge rate at 30 days 30 days postoperatively
Secondary Overall complication rate at 30 days Compare the overall complication rates between two non-cross-linked porcine dermal matrices (XenMatrix and Strattice) at 30 days postoperatively 30 days postoperatively
Secondary Rate of Surgical Site Occurrences (SSOs) at 30 days Compare the rate of Surgical Site Occurrences (SSOs) between XenMatrix and Strattice in abdominal wall reconstruction at 30 days postoperatively. These include:
Infection
Seroma
Hematoma
Wound dehiscence
Skin necrosis
Formation of enterocutaneous fistula
Mesh infection
30 days postoperatively
Secondary Hernia recurrence rate at 1 year 1 year postoperatively
Secondary Bulge rate at 1 year 1 year postoperatively
Secondary Pain intensity preoperatively Measure patient pain intensity of the two groups (XenMatrix and Strattice), at the last office visit before surgery (average of 1-3 weeks before surgery), using the PROMIS Pain Intensity survey At the last office visit before surgery (average of 1-3 weeks before surgery)
Secondary Pain interference preoperatively Measure patient pain interference of the two groups (XenMatrix and Strattice), at the last office visit before surgery (average of 1-3 weeks before surgery), using the PROMIS Pain Interference survey At the last office visit before surgery (average of 1-3 weeks before surgery)
Secondary Pain intensity postoperatively Measure patient pain intensity of the two groups (XenMatrix and Strattice), at 1 year postoperatively, using the PROMIS Pain Intensity survey 1 year postoperatively
Secondary Pain interference postoperatively Measure patient pain interference of the two groups (XenMatrix and Strattice), at 1 year postoperatively, using the PROMIS Pain Interference survey 1 year postoperatively
Secondary Physical functioning preoperatively Measure physical functioning of the two groups (XenMatrix and Strattice), at the last office visit before surgery (average of 1-3 weeks before surgery), using the PROMIS Physical Function survey At the last office visit before surgery (average of 1-3 weeks before surgery)
Secondary Physical functioning postoperatively Measure physical functioning of the two groups (XenMatrix and Strattice), at 1 year postoperatively, using the PROMIS Physical Function survey 1 year postoperatively
Secondary Quality of life preoperatively Measure patient quality of life of the two groups (XenMatrix and Strattice), at the last office visit before surgery (average of 1-3 weeks before surgery), using the HerQLes survey (Hernia Related Quality of Life survey) At the last office visit before surgery (average of 1-3 weeks before surgery)
Secondary Quality of life postoperatively Measure patient quality of life of the two groups (XenMatrix and Strattice), at 1 year postoperatively, using the HerQLes survey (Hernia Related Quality of Life survey) 1 year postoperatively
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06051578 - Abdominal Wall Tension in Patients Undergoing Ventral Hernia Repair Without Component Separation
Recruiting NCT04098380 - Small Versus Large Bite Closure of Emergency Midline Laparotomy N/A
Completed NCT02616718 - Incisional Hernia Progression Over Time N/A
Completed NCT06034652 - T-GENVIH-003 LTFU (Long Term Follow Up) Study
Completed NCT04222517 - The Use of Local Hemostatic in Patients With Large Incisional Hernias N/A
Completed NCT00749268 - AbsorbaTack Evaluation of Postoperative Pain Following Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05467124 - Enhanced Recovery After Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
Completed NCT00472537 - ProLOVE - Prospective Randomized Study of Midline Incisional Hernia Treatment N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02365194 - Modifying Risk in Ventral Hernia Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT04718168 - GORE® ENFORM Biomaterial Product Study N/A
Completed NCT02594241 - PreOperative Steroid in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02363790 - Primary Fascial Closure With Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT02398565 - Pregnancy Subsequent to Ventral Hernia Repair N/A
Terminated NCT02041494 - Complex Ventral Hernia Repair Using Biologic or Synthetic Mesh N/A
Completed NCT00532870 - Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Mesh Repair of Ventral Hernia: Comparison to Conventional Mesh Repair N/A
Completed NCT05320055 - Pain and Readmission After Lap IPOM vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair
Completed NCT04229940 - Peritoneal in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair 2 Phase 2
Completed NCT05446675 - Endoscopic eTEP Versus Open Rives-Stoppa
Completed NCT05912868 - Endoscopic Mini/Less Open Sublay(EMILOS) Repair
Not yet recruiting NCT06449378 - Transorbâ„¢ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh in High-risk Subjects Undergoing Open Repair of Ventral Hernia N/A