Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02023203
Other study ID # LP-PTFE
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received December 13, 2013
Last updated December 23, 2013
Start date January 2011
Est. completion date August 2013

Study information

Verified date December 2013
Source Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Spain: Comité Coordinador de Ética de la Investigación Biomédica de Andalucía
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgeries around the world. It accounts for approximately 75% of all abdominal wall hernias and presents a lifetime risk of 27% in males and 3% in females. Since the modern concept of surgical hernia repair described by Bassini in 1887, with the technique that bears his name, several techniques have been developed in the last century in order to improve surgical outcomes after inguinal hernia repair.

Different open repairs, such as anterior (Shouldice, McVay) or posterior (Stoppa) approach were described and developed, until Lichtenstein described the tension-free hernioplasty concept supported by the use of a prosthetic mesh to repair the hernia defect. Notable Improvements were observed with this technique in terms of recurrence, pain, and discomfort in comparison with previous tension repairs. Considerable advantages over open repair have been obtained with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery to inguinal hernia repair, in terms of patient comfort and recurrence rates.

Regarding prosthetic material, meshes have evolved since the first Dacron mesh used by Lichtenstein. First generation meshes were manufactured using more material and for this reason they have been described as heavyweight meshes. New generation meshes have been designed with less material in order to diminish the inflammatory response and foreign body reaction, providing less chronic pain with similar recurrence rates than heavyweight meshes. The density (or weight) of the mesh, measured in g/m2, is inversely proportional to the size of the pore and lately it has been reported that one of the main aspects related to prosthetic materials is pore size. Large pore meshes use less material, consequently they have been associated with a better tissue ingrowth. The large pore of lightweight meshes is conditioned by the less amount of material used.

All previous studies compare both light and heavyweight polypropylene meshes But in order to get a proper comparison of the behavior of meshes in the inguinal region it is important to include the material and the pore size. The aim of our study is to compare patient-reported outcomes with the use of either a Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) large pore mesh (LP-PTFE) vs a small pore polypropylene mesh (SP-PPL).


Description:

Patients fitted for laparoscopic bilateral inguinal hernia repair will be randomized to recieve one of both meshes on study in both inguinal sides.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date August 2013
Est. primary completion date October 2012
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Male
Age group 20 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- male patients

- 20-80 years old

- Primary Bilateral Hernia

Exclusion Criteria:

- Women

- BMI >35

- Recurrent hernias

- Previous infraumbilical laparotomy

- Inguinoscrotal hernias

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Totally Extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
Laparoscopic hernioplasty

Locations

Country Name City State
Spain Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio Seville

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (3)

Jacob DA, Schug-Pass C, Sommerer F, Tannapfel A, Lippert H, Köckerling F. Comparison of a lightweight polypropylene mesh (Optilene® LP) and a large-pore knitted PTFE mesh (GORE® INFINIT® mesh)--Biocompatibility in a standardized endoscopic extraperitoneal hernia model. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Feb;397(2):283-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0858-8. Epub 2011 Oct 12. — View Citation

Melman L, Jenkins ED, Hamilton NA, Bender LC, Brodt MD, Deeken CR, Greco SC, Frisella MM, Matthews BD. Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of a novel macroporous polytetrafluoroethylene knit mesh compared to lightweight and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair. Hernia. 2011 Aug;15(4):423-31. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0787-z. Epub 2011 Jan 30. — View Citation

Pascual G, Hernández-Gascón B, Rodríguez M, Sotomayor S, Peña E, Calvo B, Bellón JM. The long-term behavior of lightweight and heavyweight meshes used to repair abdominal wall defects is determined by the host tissue repair process provoked by the mesh. Surgery. 2012 Nov;152(5):886-95. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 May 8. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Postoperative Discomfort Postoperative Discomfort in the inguinal area is assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS)on the first 12 postoperative months.
Discomfort is defined as a disturbing sensation without influencing normal activities of the patient
1 year Yes
Secondary Postoperative Pain Postoperative pain in the inguinal area is assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS)on the first 12 postoperative months.
Pain is described as an unpleasant sensation that interferes with the normal activities of the patient
1 year Yes
Secondary Recurrence Reappearance of a inguinal hernia in a previous operated inguinal hernia. 1 year Yes
Secondary Postoperative complications Complications such as seroma or haematoma in groin area. 1 year Yes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02975401 - Robotic Utility for Surgical Treatment of Groin Hernias N/A
Completed NCT01421602 - A Prospective Observational Study on the Use of a Self Fixating Lightweight Polyester Mesh in Open Inguinal Hernia
Recruiting NCT01830452 - Less Chronic Pain After Lichtenstein Hernioplasty Using the Self-gripping Parietex Progrip Mesh Phase 4
Completed NCT00130091 - The Addition of Clonidine to 0.2% Ropivacaine for Wound Instillation After Minor Lower Abdominal Surgery in Children Phase 2
Completed NCT03665883 - Use of Diathermy Versus Blunt Dissection in TEP for Inguinal Hernia N/A
Recruiting NCT03041948 - Evaluating Pain Outcomes of Caudal vs Ilioinguinal Nerve Block in Children Undergoing Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT02751190 - Chronic Pain After Groin Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT04839848 - Chronic Postoperative Pain After the Lichtenstein Groin Hernioplasty
Completed NCT04228536 - Chronic Pain After Groin Hernia Surgery in Women
Recruiting NCT02011698 - Absorbable Sutures , Non Absorbable Sutures or Biologic Fibrin Glue for Protesic Mesh Fixing in Lichtenstein Technique for Primitive Groin Hernia Repair: a Randomized Prospective Multicentric Trial N/A
Completed NCT00827944 - Parietex Progrip Study Phase 4
Completed NCT00749268 - AbsorbaTack Evaluation of Postoperative Pain Following Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Phase 4
Recruiting NCT03673163 - Lidocaine Infusion for Pain After Herniotomy N/A
Terminated NCT00735124 - Post-Operative Pain Scores and Analgesic Requirements After Elective Inguinal Herniorrhaphy Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05323552 - Hernia Repair Using the Totally ExtraPeritoneal (TEP) Laparoscopic Approach Without Curare and Without Orotracheal Intubation.
Completed NCT03326700 - Effects of Hernia Repair on Men's Sexual Functions N/A
Completed NCT02616406 - Objective Measure of Recovery After Outpatient Surgery
Recruiting NCT05839587 - Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT03392636 - Comparison of Recurrence Rate of 2 Herniotomy Techniques in Children Older Than 2 Years N/A
Completed NCT05600296 - Ultrasound-guided Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Block Compared to the Combined Therapy With Spermatic Cord Block Phase 1