View clinical trials related to Hernia, Hiatal.
Filter by:In 2008, the World Health Organization (WHO) report found that 0.5-1.5 billion people aged 20 years and above suffer from overweight (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25) and obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg / m2) stated. WHO estimates that the number of overweight and obese people will reach 2.3 and 0.7 billion, respectively, by 2045. Bariatric surgery has been developed in response to the number of obese patients living in the world and the complications caused by obesity. The most common type of bariatric surgery against obesity is Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). As after any surgical operation, complications may occur after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Additional operations may be required to correct complications such as bleeding, anastomotic leak, gastric volvulus, infection, dyspepsia, hiatal hernia, bile and/or acid reflux. The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is significantly increased in obese patients compared to the incidence in normal individuals. Various studies have shown that obesity causes delayed gastric emptying due to increased abdominal pressure, esophageal motility disorders, especially hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter pressure (<10 mm Hg), finally the development of hiatal hernia (HH), whose prevalence in the obese population is significantly higher than in non-obese patients. Various surgical methods have been presented to prevent postoperative de-novo Gastroesophageal Reflux and de-novo Hiatal Hernia that occur after LSG. Curorrhaphy is one of these techniques that is accepted to prevent the formation or exacerbation of postoperative GERD and Hiatal Hernia. In this surgical technique, after the diaphragmatic crura are completely exposed at the level of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), the hiatal hernia, if present, is reduced into the abdomen. Afterwards, Z surgical sutures are applied to the diaphragmatic crura to make the diaphragmatic esophageal ring narrow enough. In this way, it is aimed to strengthen the diaphragmatic crus. Findings following cruroplasty for GERD prevention are varied. Although some authors state that the technique does not provide an advantage in preventing postoperative GERD, some studies have shown cruroplasty to be effective. In this study, investigators aimed to show that the technique of simultaneous cruroplasty and single suture omentopexy with LSG is a treatment for GERD and HH, which are very common in obese patients, and a preventive technique for de-novo GERD seen after LSG.
Patients often present with a significant burden of fibrosis upon diagnosis as there is interest in identifying these individuals earlier in their disease course (i.e., "subclinical disease") where targeted treatments and modification of risk factors may curb their progression to fulminant fibrosing ILD. The investigators have investigated with computed tomography (CT) methods such as interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) and high attenuation areas (HAAs) that may detect early radiological signs of interstitial lung inflammation and scarring and novel modifiable risk factors that contribute to its pathogenesis. Among adults without clinically-diagnosed pulmonary fibrosis, those with a hiatal hernia will have higher levels of pepsin in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) compared with adults without a hiatal hernia. Secondarily, examinination on whether there are differences in other reflux contents from BALF including total bile, and peripheral biomarkers related to lung injury and fibrogenesis which include matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125).
Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is highly prevalent in our society. The association between GERD and hiatal hernia has been shown to be etiologically critical in the onset or worsening of these patients' clinic. Pharmacological treatment with proton pump inhibitors (IBPs) and H2 blockers is commonly prescribed and will be followed for many patients for life. The cost of health care and the effects of prolonged consumption of PPIs are questionable, and other therapeutic alternatives are being considered. Only in exceptional cases and in patients with GERD and certain types of hiatal hernia is surgery the treatment of choice. Physiotherapy at the time proposed respiratory and diaphragmatic training as a therapeutic alternative that would improve the function of anti-reflux barriers. Recently, other studies evaluating the effectiveness of manual techniques on the crural diaphragm or osteopathic maneuvers on the cervical and thoracic region have obtained good results in the improvement of the MRGE clinic. In this context, the clinical trial presented specifically treats those with reflux disease associated with a Type I hiatal hernia with manual therapy. Material and methods: The aim of the clinical study is to evaluate the effects of a clinical intervention protocol on patients with GERD for type I hiatal hernia. The variables are assessed: GERD impact using the GIS MRG Impact Scale, and the EVA format scale for the Reflux Clinic (IEPT) used by the Surgery Service of the Parc Taulí Hospital in Sabadell . The productivity and quality of life of these patients is also assessed using the QOLRAD reflux and dyspepsia patient quality of life questionnaire. The randomized, double-blind clinical trial has a sample of 44 patients, divided into an intervention group treated with the protocol under study, and a control group undergoing treatment that does not affect the hernia. hiatus and reflux. A total of three treatment sessions are performed on each subject. The participants answer the different questionnaires, before the start of the treatment and for each session, one week after the treatment and one month later. In the protocol, maneuvers are performed on the epigastric region, thoracic diaphragm, mediastinum and anterior face of the neck.
Patients scheduled for surgery for primary paraesophageal herniation are randomized to either conventional suturing of the crura or with the addition of lateral release.
Prospective registry comparing outcomes after laparoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatal hernia.
The purpose of this study is to observe the effective and safety in the laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia using biological patch versus plastic.
This study is prospective randomized trial enrolling at least 50 participants which compares efficacy and safety of two alternative methods of laparoscopic hiatal repair for giant (i.e. with hiatal surface area (HSA) exceeding 20 sq.cm) types II and III hiatal hernias: partially absorbable lightweight mesh repair, and nitinol-framed lightweight polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh repair. In the literature, mean rate of anatomical recurrence of giant hiatal hernias is 25 %, reaching 42 %. Polypropylene and composite PTFE meshes used most widely, result in unacceptable rates of long-term dysphagia (10-15 %) and oesophageal strictures. Own experience of the interventors of more than 400 repairs using partially absorbable lightweight mesh Ultrapro (Ethicon) and original sub-lay technique of its fixation precluding contact of the mesh with the oesophagus, showed low recurrence rate for large hernias and a few cases of long-term dysphagia. For giant hiatal hernias, this technique provides acceptable results (20 % of recurrence) which correspond to the literature. Nevertheless, these results may be improved, probably by using of new type of prosthesis. Thus, in collaboration with Minnesota Medical Development, Inc., USA, the interventors created fundamentally new method of hiatal repair by using new prosthesis - Rebound HRD-Hiatus hernia. This prosthesis is heart-shaped lightweight PTFE mesh with peripheral nitinol frame. It is easily fixated to the crura posteriorly to the oesophagus completely covering hernia defect, and supports a strong framework of the hiatus, and, therefore, allows to save a principle a real tension-free repair. Mid-term results (mean follow-up period of 15 months) of 29 procedures showed no recurrences or oesophageal complications. Naturally, final conclusions regarding superiority of the new technique could be established by prospective randomized study. The hypothesis of the current trial is: new method of nitinol-framed lightweight PTFE mesh repair is more effective in terms of recurrence rate compared to sub-lay partially absorbable lightweight mesh repair, and is characterized by at least similar safety in terms of oesophageal complications. The long-term results (24 months post surgery for every patient) will be studied using symptom questionnaires, quality of life and satisfaction questionnaires, barium studies, endoscopic examinations, 24-hour pH testing, and analysis of possible reoperations.
In 2006 this research group reported their initial findings of a multi-center prospective trial comparing primary repair and primary repair buttressed with a biologic mesh made from porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS). We were able to accrue 108 patients from 7/2002-3/2005 and followed each patient over 6 months and performed an UGI to check the durability of the repair and rule out a recurrence. The results suggested a significant benefit for the use of SIS mesh in the short-term, with the primary group having a 26% recurrence rate and the mesh group a 9% recurrence rate. While these results are encouraging, it is important to know what is the durability and the longer term benefits of the use of SIS mesh. For this reason we propose a follow-up of the original study patients with the same outcome measures (symptom questionnaire, SF-36, and UGI). This should give us a very good idea about the long-term success of laparoscopic PEH repair with primary and SIS mesh.