Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00262080
Other study ID # EDEMA3 (DX-88/14)
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date December 31, 2005
Est. completion date February 28, 2007

Study information

Verified date June 2021
Source Takeda
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if a subcutaneous dose of DX-88 (ecallantide; an investigational product) is safe and relieves symptoms of HAE in patients suffering from moderate to severe acute attacks of HAE.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 91
Est. completion date February 28, 2007
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2005
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 10 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Age 10 and older - Documented diagnosis of HAE, Type I or II - Executed informed consent - Presentation for treatment within 8 hours of patient recognition of moderate to severe HAE attack Exclusion Criteria: - Receipt of investigational drug or device, other than DX-88, within 30 days of treatment - Receipt of non-investigational C1-INH (C1 esterase inhibitor) within 7 days of treatment - Diagnostic of acquired angioedema, estrogen-dependent angioedema or drug induced angioedema - Pregnancy or breastfeeding - Patients who have received DX-88 within 7 days of presentation for dosing in the Double-blind Phase

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
ecallantide
dose of 30 mg (10 mg/ml) given as 3 subcutaneous injections.
Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS),
given as three 1mL subcutaneous injections.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Institute for Asthma and Allergy Wheaton Maryland

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Shire

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Number of Patients With Symptom Complexes of Treated Attack at Baseline(DOUBLE-BLIND PART) Patient-reported severity of symptom complexes at baseline, by symptom complex and treatment group. Patients were to have at least one symptom complex that was moderate or severe. Patients could present with multiple symptom complexes, some of which could be mild. Mild=noticeable but do not impact daily living activities; Moderate=treatment or intervention is highly desirable and activities of daily living are impacted; Severe=require treatment or intervention due to inability to perform activities of daily living. The results are for number of patients with symptom complexes including mild, moderate and severe, provided the patients have at least one symptom complex that was moderate or severe Baseline
Other Treatment Outcome Score at 4 Hours Post-Dose Over Multiple Treatment Episodes Treatment Outcome Score (TOS) is a validated, comprehensive measure of symptom response to treatment. At 4 hours , patient assessment of response characterized by their change from baseline in symptom severity and collected by anatomic site of attack involvement, was recorded on a categorical scale (significant improvement [100] to significant worsening [-100]). The response at each anatomic site was weighted by baseline severity and then the weighted scores across all involved sites were averaged to calculate the TOS. Clinically meaningful improvement was indicated by a TOS of 30 or higher. 4 hours post-dose (REPEAT-DOSING PART)
Other Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) Score at 4 Hours Post-dose Over Multiple Treatment Episodes The Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) score is a validated, comprehensive point-in-time measure of symptom severity. At baseline and 4 hours, patients rated the severity on a categorical scale (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) for symptoms at each affected anatomical location. Ratings were averaged to obtain the MSCS score. A decrease in MSCS score reflected an improvement in symptoms; clinically meaningful improvement was indicated by a reduction in the score of 0.30 or more. baseline, 4 hours post-dose (REPEAT-DOSING PART)
Other Time to Significant Improvement in Overall Response Over Multiple Treatment Episodes The overall response assessment is a patient-reported assessment of global response to therapy. Patients are asked to perform an overall response assessment at regular intervals, relative to baseline (ie,immediately before treatment) using the following 5-category scale from significant improvement (Score = 100)to significant worsening (Score = -100) 4 hours post-dose (REPEAT-DOSING PART)
Primary Treatment Outcome Score at 4 Hours Post-Dose Treatment Outcome Score (TOS) is a validated, comprehensive measure of symptom response to treatment. At 4 hours , patient assessment of response characterized by their change from baseline in symptom severity and collected by anatomic site of attack involvement, was recorded on a categorical scale (significant improvement [100] to significant worsening [-100]). The response at each anatomic site was weighted by baseline severity and then the weighted scores across all involved sites were averaged to calculate the TOS. Clinically meaningful improvement was indicated by a TOS of 30 or higher. 4 hours post-dose (DOUBLE-BLIND PART)
Secondary Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) Score at 4 Hours Post-dose Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) score is a validated, comprehensive point-in-time measure of symptom severity. At baseline and 4 hours, patients rated the severity on a categorical scale (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) for symptoms at each affected anatomical location. Ratings were averaged to obtain the MSCS score. A decrease in MSCS score reflected an improvement in symptoms; clinically meaningful improvement (minimally important difference) was indicated by a reduction in the score of 0.30 or more. baseline, 4 hours post-dose (DOUBLE-BLIND PART)
Secondary Time to Significant Improvement in Overall Response The overall response assessment is a patient-reported assessment of global response to therapy. Patients are asked to perform an overall response assessment at regular intervals, relative to baseline. Patients were asked "overall how are you feeling" compared to how they felt before study drug. Answer options were "a lot worse", "a little worse", "same", "a little better" or "a lot better or resolved". Significant improvement was the first time that the patient responded to the assessment as "a little better or resolved". 4 hours post-dose (DOUBLE-BLIND PART)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02865720 - Study of C1 Inhibitor (Human) for the Prevention of Angioedema Attacks and Treatment of Breakthrough Attacks in Japanese Subjects With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Phase 3
Completed NCT04861090 - A Study in Teenagers and Adults With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Type I or Type II Who Use Lanadelumab as Long-Term Prophylaxis
Recruiting NCT05489640 - A Study in Adults With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Who Currently Receive Icatibant at Home
Completed NCT02584959 - Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneously Administered C1 Esterase Inhibitor for the Prevention of Angioedema Attacks in Adolescents and Adults With Hereditary Angioedema Phase 3
Completed NCT01826916 - EDEMA2: Evaluation of DX-88's Effect in Mitigating Angioedema Phase 2
Completed NCT04057131 - FIRAZYR General Drug Use-Results Survey (Japan)
Recruiting NCT05819775 - CSL312_3003 Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study in Subjects 2 to 11 Years of Age With Hereditary Angioedema Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05397431 - A Survey of Lanadelumab in Participants With Hereditary Angioedema
Completed NCT02741596 - Long-term Safety and Efficacy Study of DX-2930 (SHP643) to Prevent Acute Angioedema Attacks in Patients With Type I and Type II HAE Phase 3
Completed NCT02093923 - A Double-Blind, Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of DX-2930 in Hereditary Angioedema Participants Phase 1
Completed NCT01541423 - A European Post-Authorisation Observational Study Of Patients With Hereditary Angioedema
Completed NCT03845400 - A Study of Lanadelumab in Persons With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Type I or II in North America
Completed NCT02586805 - Efficacy and Safety Study of DX-2930 to Prevent Acute Angioedema Attacks in Patients With Type I and Type II HAE Phase 3
Completed NCT02052141 - Safety and Efficacy Study of CINRYZE for Prevention of Angioedema Attacks in Children Ages 6-11 With Hereditary Angioedema Phase 3
Completed NCT03888755 - A Study of Icatibant for Acute Attacks of Hereditary Angioedema in Japanese Participants Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05147181 - A Study With Lanadelumab in Persons With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) in Poland
Recruiting NCT05469789 - A Study of Lanadelumab in Teenagers and Adults With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)
Completed NCT05460325 - A Study of Lanadelumab (SHP643) in Chinese Participants With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Phase 3
Completed NCT01095510 - CINRYZE for the Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks in Children Under the Age of 12 Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05578417 - A Study to Review the Treatment and Outcomes of Teenagers and Adults With Non-histaminergic Angioedema With Normal C1 Inhibitor in Canada