Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study (72 Patients, Randomized 1:1) Followed by a Repeat-dosing Phase to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of DX-88 (Ecallantide; Recombinant Plasma Kallikrein Inhibitor) for the Treatment of Acute Attacks of Hereditary Angioedema
Verified date | June 2021 |
Source | Takeda |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to determine if a subcutaneous dose of DX-88 (ecallantide; an investigational product) is safe and relieves symptoms of HAE in patients suffering from moderate to severe acute attacks of HAE.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 91 |
Est. completion date | February 28, 2007 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2005 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 10 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age 10 and older - Documented diagnosis of HAE, Type I or II - Executed informed consent - Presentation for treatment within 8 hours of patient recognition of moderate to severe HAE attack Exclusion Criteria: - Receipt of investigational drug or device, other than DX-88, within 30 days of treatment - Receipt of non-investigational C1-INH (C1 esterase inhibitor) within 7 days of treatment - Diagnostic of acquired angioedema, estrogen-dependent angioedema or drug induced angioedema - Pregnancy or breastfeeding - Patients who have received DX-88 within 7 days of presentation for dosing in the Double-blind Phase |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Institute for Asthma and Allergy | Wheaton | Maryland |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Shire |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Number of Patients With Symptom Complexes of Treated Attack at Baseline(DOUBLE-BLIND PART) | Patient-reported severity of symptom complexes at baseline, by symptom complex and treatment group. Patients were to have at least one symptom complex that was moderate or severe. Patients could present with multiple symptom complexes, some of which could be mild. Mild=noticeable but do not impact daily living activities; Moderate=treatment or intervention is highly desirable and activities of daily living are impacted; Severe=require treatment or intervention due to inability to perform activities of daily living. The results are for number of patients with symptom complexes including mild, moderate and severe, provided the patients have at least one symptom complex that was moderate or severe | Baseline | |
Other | Treatment Outcome Score at 4 Hours Post-Dose Over Multiple Treatment Episodes | Treatment Outcome Score (TOS) is a validated, comprehensive measure of symptom response to treatment. At 4 hours , patient assessment of response characterized by their change from baseline in symptom severity and collected by anatomic site of attack involvement, was recorded on a categorical scale (significant improvement [100] to significant worsening [-100]). The response at each anatomic site was weighted by baseline severity and then the weighted scores across all involved sites were averaged to calculate the TOS. Clinically meaningful improvement was indicated by a TOS of 30 or higher. | 4 hours post-dose (REPEAT-DOSING PART) | |
Other | Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) Score at 4 Hours Post-dose Over Multiple Treatment Episodes | The Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) score is a validated, comprehensive point-in-time measure of symptom severity. At baseline and 4 hours, patients rated the severity on a categorical scale (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) for symptoms at each affected anatomical location. Ratings were averaged to obtain the MSCS score. A decrease in MSCS score reflected an improvement in symptoms; clinically meaningful improvement was indicated by a reduction in the score of 0.30 or more. | baseline, 4 hours post-dose (REPEAT-DOSING PART) | |
Other | Time to Significant Improvement in Overall Response Over Multiple Treatment Episodes | The overall response assessment is a patient-reported assessment of global response to therapy. Patients are asked to perform an overall response assessment at regular intervals, relative to baseline (ie,immediately before treatment) using the following 5-category scale from significant improvement (Score = 100)to significant worsening (Score = -100) | 4 hours post-dose (REPEAT-DOSING PART) | |
Primary | Treatment Outcome Score at 4 Hours Post-Dose | Treatment Outcome Score (TOS) is a validated, comprehensive measure of symptom response to treatment. At 4 hours , patient assessment of response characterized by their change from baseline in symptom severity and collected by anatomic site of attack involvement, was recorded on a categorical scale (significant improvement [100] to significant worsening [-100]). The response at each anatomic site was weighted by baseline severity and then the weighted scores across all involved sites were averaged to calculate the TOS. Clinically meaningful improvement was indicated by a TOS of 30 or higher. | 4 hours post-dose (DOUBLE-BLIND PART) | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) Score at 4 Hours Post-dose | Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) score is a validated, comprehensive point-in-time measure of symptom severity. At baseline and 4 hours, patients rated the severity on a categorical scale (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) for symptoms at each affected anatomical location. Ratings were averaged to obtain the MSCS score. A decrease in MSCS score reflected an improvement in symptoms; clinically meaningful improvement (minimally important difference) was indicated by a reduction in the score of 0.30 or more. | baseline, 4 hours post-dose (DOUBLE-BLIND PART) | |
Secondary | Time to Significant Improvement in Overall Response | The overall response assessment is a patient-reported assessment of global response to therapy. Patients are asked to perform an overall response assessment at regular intervals, relative to baseline. Patients were asked "overall how are you feeling" compared to how they felt before study drug. Answer options were "a lot worse", "a little worse", "same", "a little better" or "a lot better or resolved". Significant improvement was the first time that the patient responded to the assessment as "a little better or resolved". | 4 hours post-dose (DOUBLE-BLIND PART) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02865720 -
Study of C1 Inhibitor (Human) for the Prevention of Angioedema Attacks and Treatment of Breakthrough Attacks in Japanese Subjects With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04861090 -
A Study in Teenagers and Adults With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Type I or Type II Who Use Lanadelumab as Long-Term Prophylaxis
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05489640 -
A Study in Adults With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Who Currently Receive Icatibant at Home
|
||
Completed |
NCT02584959 -
Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneously Administered C1 Esterase Inhibitor for the Prevention of Angioedema Attacks in Adolescents and Adults With Hereditary Angioedema
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01826916 -
EDEMA2: Evaluation of DX-88's Effect in Mitigating Angioedema
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04057131 -
FIRAZYR General Drug Use-Results Survey (Japan)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05819775 -
CSL312_3003 Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study in Subjects 2 to 11 Years of Age With Hereditary Angioedema
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05397431 -
A Survey of Lanadelumab in Participants With Hereditary Angioedema
|
||
Completed |
NCT02741596 -
Long-term Safety and Efficacy Study of DX-2930 (SHP643) to Prevent Acute Angioedema Attacks in Patients With Type I and Type II HAE
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02093923 -
A Double-Blind, Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of DX-2930 in Hereditary Angioedema Participants
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01541423 -
A European Post-Authorisation Observational Study Of Patients With Hereditary Angioedema
|
||
Completed |
NCT03845400 -
A Study of Lanadelumab in Persons With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Type I or II in North America
|
||
Completed |
NCT02586805 -
Efficacy and Safety Study of DX-2930 to Prevent Acute Angioedema Attacks in Patients With Type I and Type II HAE
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02052141 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of CINRYZE for Prevention of Angioedema Attacks in Children Ages 6-11 With Hereditary Angioedema
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03888755 -
A Study of Icatibant for Acute Attacks of Hereditary Angioedema in Japanese Participants
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05147181 -
A Study With Lanadelumab in Persons With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) in Poland
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05469789 -
A Study of Lanadelumab in Teenagers and Adults With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)
|
||
Completed |
NCT05460325 -
A Study of Lanadelumab (SHP643) in Chinese Participants With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01095510 -
CINRYZE for the Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks in Children Under the Age of 12
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05578417 -
A Study to Review the Treatment and Outcomes of Teenagers and Adults With Non-histaminergic Angioedema With Normal C1 Inhibitor in Canada
|